A phase 2 study of pracinostat combined with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis

References

• Deisseroth A, Kaminskas E, Grillo J, et al. U.S. food and drug administration approval: Ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with intermediate and high-risk myelofibrosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3212–3217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Kantarjian H, Mesa RA, et al. Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1117–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Gotlib J, Mesa RA, et al. Long-term survival in patients treated with ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: COMFORT-I and -II pooled analyses. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes F, Pereira A. Does ruxolitinib prolong the survival of patients with myelofibrosis? Blood 2017;129:832–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R. A comprehensive review and analysis of the effect of ruxolitinib therapy on the survival of patients with myelofibrosis. Blood 2013;121:4832–4837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia 2016;30:1701–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Kantarjian HM, Estrov Z, et al. Long-term outcomes of 107 patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib: survival advantage in comparison to matched historical controls. Blood 2012;120:1202–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannucchi AM, Kantarjian HM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase 3 trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Haematologica 2015;100:1139–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppikar P, Bhagwat N, Kilpivaara O, et al. Heterodimeric JAK-STAT activation as a mechanism of persistence to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. Nature 2012;489:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose P, Dai Y, Grant S. Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) mechanisms of action: emerging insights. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;143:323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali P, Pranpat M, Bradner J, et al. Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 acetylates and disrupts the chaperone function of heat shock protein 90: a novel basis for antileukemia activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:26729–26734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson MA, Bannister AJ, Gottgens B, et al. JAK2 phosphorylates histone H3Y41 and excludes HP1alpha from chromatin. Nature 2009;461:819–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Zhao X, Perna F, et al. JAK2V617F-mediated phosphorylation of PRMT5 downregulates its methyltransferase activity and promotes myeloproliferation. Cancer Cell 2011;19:283–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwat N, Koppikar P, Keller M, et al. Improved targeting of JAK2 leads to increased therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2014;123:2075–2083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose P, Verstovsek S. Investigational histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Expert Opin Investig Drugs.2016;25:1393–140s3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fiskus W, Chong DG, et al. Cotreatment with panobinostat and JAK2 inhibitor TG101209 attenuates JAK2V617F levels and signaling and exerts synergistic cytotoxic effects against human myeloproliferative neoplastic cells. Blood 2009;114:5024–5033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civallero M, Cosenza M, Pozzi S, et al. Ruxolitinib combined with vorinostat suppresses tumor growth and alters metabolic phenotype in hematological diseases. Oncotarget 2017;8:103797–103814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novotny-Diermayr V, Hart S, Goh KC, et al. The oral HDAC inhibitor pracinostat (SB939) is efficacious and synergistic with the JAK2 inhibitor pacritinib (SB1518) in preclinical models of AML. Blood Cancer J. 2012;2:e69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Manero G, Atallah E, Khaled SK, et al. A phase 2 study of pracinostat and azacitidine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not eligible for induction chemotherapy: Response and long-term survival benefit. Blood 2016;128:100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, Estrov Z, et al. Therapy with the histone deacetylase inhibitor pracinostat for patients with myelofibrosis. Leuk Res. 2012;36:1124–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefferi A, Barosi G, Mesa RA, et al. International working group (IWG) consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, for the IWG for myelofibrosis research and treatment (IWG-MRT). Blood 2006;108:1497–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the international working group for myelofibrosis research and treatment. Blood 2009;113:2895–2901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, et al. Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International working group-myeloproliferative neoplasms research and treatment (IWG-MRT) and european LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood 2013;122:1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. JCO 2012;30:4098–4103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thall PF, Simon RM, Estey EH. Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes. Stat Med. 1995;14:357–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Facchetti F, et al. European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. Haematologica 2005;90:1128–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas J, Lu M, Li T, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythaemia vera/essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Br J Haematol. 2013;161:68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finazzi G, Martino B, Pezzuto A, et al. A two-part study of givinostat in patients with polycythemia vera: Maximum tolerated dose definition and preliminary efficacy results. Blood. 2016;128:4261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo DJ, Mesa RA, Fiskus W, et al. Phase II trial of panobinostat, an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor in patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-essential thrombocythaemia, and post-polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:326–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas J, Sandy L, Lu M, et al. A phase II study of panobinostat in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2017;53:13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong X, Lin Z, Liang D, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce VHL and ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:2019–2028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian DZ, Kachhap SK, Collis SJ, et al. Class II histone deacetylases are associated with VHL-independent regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8814–8821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daver NG, Kremyanskaya M, O'Connell C, et al. A phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of INCB050465, a selective PI3Kdelta inhibitor, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132:353.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison CN, Kiladjian JJ, Heidel FH, et al. Efficacy, safety, and confirmation of the recommended phase 2 starting dose of the combination of ruxolitinib (RUX) and panobinostat (PAN) in patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF). Blood 2015;126:4060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masarova L, Wang W, Newberry KJ, et al. Complete remission in a patient with JAK2- and IDH2-positive myelofibrosis. Blood 2016;128:877–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deininger M, Radich J, Burn TC, et al. The effect of long-term ruxolitinib treatment on JAK2p.V617F allele burden in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood 2015;126:1551–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant S, Nagler A, Vannucchi AM, et al. An open-label, multicenter, 2-arm, dose-finding, phase 1b study of the combination of ruxolitinib and buparlisib (BKM120) in patients with myelofibrosis: results from HARMONY study. Blood 2015;126:827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Harrison CN, Hasselbalch HC, et al. Phase 1b/2 study of the efficacy and safety of sonidegib (LDE225) in combination with ruxolitinib (INC424) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood 2015;126:825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waibel M, Solomon VS, Knight DA, et al. Combined targeting of JAK2 and bcl-2/Bcl-xL to cure mutant JAK2-driven malignancies and overcome acquired resistance to JAK2 inhibitors. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1047–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleppe M, Koche R, Zou L, et al. Dual targeting of oncogenic activation and inflammatory signaling increases therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Cell 2018;33:29–43.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney AS, Lau AN, Somasundara AVH, et al. JAK2/IDH-mutant-driven myeloproliferative neoplasm is sensitive to combined targeted inhibition. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:789–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieborowska-Skorska M, Maifrede S, Dasgupta Y, et al. Ruxolitinib-induced defects in DNA repair cause sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2017;130:2848–2859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose P, Daver N, Pemmaraju N, et al. Sotatercept (ACE-011) alone and in combination with ruxolitinib in patients (pts) with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia. Blood. 2017;130:255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Hasserjian RP, Pozdnyakova O, et al. PRM-151 in myelofibrosis: efficacy and safety in an open label extension study. Blood. 2018;132:686
   Google Scholar