3,622
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letters to the Editor

Prognostication of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with Deauville score of 3 or 4 at end-of-treatment PET evaluation: a comparison of the Deauville 5-point scale and the ΔSUVmax method

, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 256-259 | Received 13 Jun 2021, Accepted 28 Sep 2021, Published online: 19 Oct 2021

References

  • Pfreundschuh M, Schubert J, Ziepert M, et al. Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(2):105–116.
  • Schmitz C, Hüttmann A, Müller SP, et al. Dynamic risk assessment based on positron emission tomography scanning in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: post-hoc analysis from the PETAL trial. Eur J Cancer. 2020;124:25–36.
  • Duarte S, Afonso C, Marques B, et al. Survival independent predictive value of INTERIM FDG 18‐PET in newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Hematol Oncol. 2021;39(S2):39.
  • Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–3067..
  • Han EJ, O JH, Yoon H, et al. FDG PET/CT response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: reader variability and association with clinical outcome. Medicine. 2016;95(39):e4983.
  • Itti E, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(9):1312–1320.
  • Rekowski J, Hüttmann A, Schmitz C, et al. Interim PET evaluation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using published recommendations: comparison of the Deauville 5-point scale and the ΔSUVmax method. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(1):37–42.
  • Eertink JJ, Burggraaff CN, Heymans MW, et al. Optimal timing and criteria of interim PET in DLBCL: a comparative study of 1692 patients. Blood Adv. 2021;5(9):2375–2384.
  • Maurer MJ, Ghesquières H, Jais J-P, et al. Event-free survival at 24 months is a robust end point for disease-related outcome in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(10):1066–1073.
  • Casasnovas R-O, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118(1):37–43.
  • Hans CP. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood. 2004;103(1):275–282.
  • Wilcox RA, Ristow K, Habermann TM, et al. The absolute monocyte and lymphocyte prognostic score predicts survival and identifies high-risk patients in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2011;25(9):1502–1509.
  • Adams HJA, Kwee TC. Systematic review on the value of end-of-treatment FDG-PET in improving overall survival of lymphoma patients. Ann Hematol. 2020;99(1):1–5.
  • Barrington S, Eertink JJ, de Vet HC, et al. Not yet time to abandon the Deauville criteria in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2021;jnumed.121.262317. https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/early/2021/04/23/jnumed.121.262317/tab-article-info