Fotemustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide (FEAC) conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma

References

• Shi Y, Liu P, Zhou S, et al. Comparison of CBV, BEAM and BEAC high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: efficacy and toxicity. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(5):e423–e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damaj G, Cornillon J, Bouabdallah K, et al. Carmustine replacement in intensive chemotherapy preceding reinjection of autologous HSCs in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a review. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52(7):941–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YB, Lane AA, Logan B, et al. Impact of conditioning regimen on outcomes for patients with lymphoma undergoing high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(6):1046–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattry N, Gupta A, Jain R, et al. LACE versus BEAM conditioning in relapsed and refractory lymphoma transplant: retrospective multicenter analysis of toxicity and efficacy. Int J Hematol. 2016;103(3):292–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salar A, Sierra J, Gandarillas M, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for clinically aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the role of preparative regimens. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27(4):405–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colpo A, Hochberg E, Chen YB. Current status of autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncologist. 2012;17(1):80–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshadri T, Pintilie M, Kuruvilla J, et al. Incidence and risk factors for second cancers after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(3):380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills W, Chopra R, McMillan A, et al. BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(3):588–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe E, Rosenberg D, Rozovski U, et al. Replacing carmustine by thiotepa and cyclophosphamide for autologous stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53(1):29–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson SP, Boumendil A, Finel H, et al. High-dose therapy with BEAC conditioning compared to BEAM conditioning prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: no differences in toxicity or outcome. A matched-control study of the EBMT-Lymphoma working party. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53(12):1553–1559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garciaz S, Coso D, Schiano de Collela JM, et al. Bendamustine-based conditioning for non-Hodgkin lymphoma autologous transplantation: an increasing risk of renal toxicity. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(2):319–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vose JM, Carter S, Burns LJ, et al. Phase III randomized study of rituximab/carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) compared with iodine-131 tositumomab/BEAM with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the BMT CTN 0401 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):1662–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig N, de la Rubia J, Remigia MJ, et al. Morbidity and transplant-related mortality of CBV and BEAM preparative regimens for patients with lymphoid malignancies undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47(8):1488–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto Y, Valdez BC, Thall PF, et al. Vorinostat combined with high-dose gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory lymphomas. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(11):1914–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yang H, Qian C, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of SEAM (semustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma. Hematology. 2022;27(1):404–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musso M, Scalone R, Marcacci G, et al. Fotemustine plus etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (FEAM) as a new conditioning regimen for lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT: a multicenter feasibility study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(7):1147–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Lee HJ, Yi HG, et al. Mitoxantrone, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (NEAM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with chemosensitive aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(5):479–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri J, Mosna F, Pelosini M, Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Postgraduate Master Course, et al. A Comparison of the conditioning regimens BEAM and FEAM for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: an observational study on 1038 patients from fondazione italiana linfomi. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(9):1814–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Kayal S, Iqbal S, et al. Comparison of BEAM vs. LEAM regimen in autologous transplant for lymphoma at AIIMS. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prince HM, Imrie K, Crump M, et al. The role of intensive therapy and autologous blood and marrow transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed and primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: identification of major prognostic groups. Br J Haematol. 1996;92(4):880–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakou C, Canals C, Goldstone A, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in angioimmunoblastic lymphoma: complete remission at transplantation is the major determinant of outcome-lymphoma working party of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):218–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson MJ, Abonour R, Hromas R, et al. Augmented high-dose regimen of cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005;46(10):1477–1487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler C, Strawderman M, Ayash L, et al. Prognostic factors for treatment outcome in autotransplantation of intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(6):1085–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Horning SJ, Negrin RS, et al. Influence of preparatory regimen and source of hematopoietic cells on outcome of autotransplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1996;2(2):76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caballero MD, Rubio V, Rifon J, et al. BEAM chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell support in lymphoma patients: analysis of efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;20(6):451–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehrer JP. The effect of BCNU (carmustine) on tissue glutathione reductase activity. Toxicol Lett. 1983;17(1-2):63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaucha R, Gooley T, Holmberg L, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with BEAM or busulphan/melphalan and thiotepa followed by hematopoietic cell transplantation in malignant lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49(10):1899–1906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone RM, Neuberg D, Soiffer R, et al. Myelodysplastic syndrome as a late complication following autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(12):2535–2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadehra N, Farag S, Bolwell B, et al. Long-term outcome of Hodgkin disease patients following high-dose busulfan, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and autologous stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12(12):1343–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg JW, Neuberg D, Stone RM, et al. Outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(10):3128–3135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos CA, Grover NS, Beaven AW, et al. Anti-CD30 CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(32):3794–3804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah NN, Ahn KW, Litovich C, et al. Is autologous transplant in relapsed DLBCL patients achieving only a PET + PR appropriate in the CAR T-cell era? Blood. 2021;137(10):1416–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan J, Tan Y, Wang G, et al. Donor-Derived CD7 chimeric antigen receptor T cells for T-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: first-in-Human. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(30):3340–3351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried S, Avigdor A, Bielorai B, et al. Early and late hematologic toxicity following CD19 CAR-T cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54(10):1643–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadman M, Pasquini M, Ahn KW, et al. Autologous transplant vs chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed DLBCL in partial remission. Blood. 2022;139(9):1330–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar