Social Work at the Intersection of Disability and Displacement: Rethinking Our Role

References

• Baines, D. (2011). An overview of anti-oppressive practice: Roots, theory, tensions. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice: Building transformative, politicized social work (pp. 1–47). Halifax, NS: Fernwood Books.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. (2011). Doing anti-oppressive social work: The importance of resistance, history and strategy. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice: Building transformative, politicized social work (pp. 289–297). Halifax, NS: Fernwood Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, B. (2006). Imperialism and postcolonialism. History: Concepts, theories and practice. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Social Workers (CASW). (2005a). Code of ethics. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Social Workers (CASW). (2005b). Guidelines for ethical practice. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Carniol, B. (2010). Case critical: Social services and social justice in Canada (6th ed.). Toronto, ON: Between the Lines Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadha, E. (2008). “Mentally defectives” not welcome: Mental disability in Canadian Immigration Law, 1895-1927. Disability Studies Quarterly, 28(1). doi:10.18061/dsq.v28i1.67
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1214–1218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Lahib, Y. (2015). The inadmissible “other”: Discourses of ableism and colonialism in Canadian immigration. Journal Of Progressive Human Services, 26(3), 209-228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Lahib, Y., & Wehbi, S. (2012). Immigration and disability: Ableism in the policies of the Canadian state. International Social Work, 55(1), 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 162–187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I., & Lavalette, M. (2006). Globalization and global justice: Towards a social work of resistance. International Social Work, 49(3), 309–318. doi:10.1177/0020872806063401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• George, P., Coleman, B., & Barnoff, L. (2007). Beyond “providing services”: Voices of service users on structural social work practice in community-based social service agencies. Canadian Social Work Review, 24(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Groce, N. (2005). Immigrants, disability, and rehabilitation. In H. Stone (Ed.), Culture and disability: Providing culturally competent services (pp. 1–14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2006). The West & the rest: Discourse and power. In C. A. Maaka & C. Andersen (Eds.), The Indigenous experience: Global perspectives (pp. 165–173). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanes, R. (2009). None is still too many: An historical exploration of Canadian immigration legislation as it pertains to people with disabilities. Development Disabilities Bulletin, 37(1), 91–126.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2003). “All doors are closed to us”: A social model analysis of the experiences of disabled refugees and asylum seekers in Britain. Disability & Society, 18(4), 395–410. doi:10.1080/0968759032000080968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Roberts, K. (2004). “Not our problem”: The provision of services to disabled refugees and asylum-seekers. In D. Hayes & B. Humphreys (Eds.), Social work, immigration and asylum: Debates, dilemmas and ethical issues for social work and social care practice (pp. 151–161). New York, NY: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). (2018, July 2). Global social work statement of ethical principles. Retrieved on August 29 from: https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles/
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and methodological aspects of foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 34–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Loomba, A. (2001). Colonialism/postcolonialism: The new critical idiom. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, L. (1997). Under the cover of kindness: The invention of social work. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2003). Historical development of critical social work practice. In J. Allan, B. Pease, & L. Briskman (Eds.), Critical social work: An introduction to theories and practices (pp. 17–31). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, C. (2006). Challenging social work: The context of practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, J. (2001). Issues in international social work: Resolving critical debates in the profession. Journal of Social Work, 1(1), 21–35. doi:10.1177/146801730100100103
   Google Scholar
• Millar, M. (2008). “Anti-oppressiveness”: Critical comments on a discourse and its context. British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 362–375. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza, M. (2011a). Disability and humanitarianism in refugee camps: The case for a traveling super national disability praxis. Third World Quarterly, 23(8), 1527–1536. doi:10.1080/01436597.2011.604524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza, M. (2011b). Disability and cross-border mobility: Comparing resettlement experiences of Cambodian and Somali refugees with disabilities. Disability & Society, 26(5), 521–535. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.589188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza, M., & Heinemann, A. W. (2012). Service needs and service gaps among refugees with disabilities resettled in the United States. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(7), 542–552. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.611211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2017, August 4). Highlighted revisions to the code of ethics. Retrieved on August 30, 2018 from: https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Highlighted-Revisions-to-the-Code-of-Ethics
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2018). Code of ethics. Retrieved on August 30, 2018 from: https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics
   Google Scholar
• Poole, J. (2011). Behind the rhetoric: Mental health recovery in Ontario. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. (2000). Lost in the system? Disabled refugees and asylum seekers in Britain. Disability & Society, 15(6), 943–948. doi:10.1080/713662008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settlement at Work (2012). Welcoming and inclusive communities: Accessibility project. Retrieved on August 26, 2017 from: http://wiki.settlementatwork.org/wiki/Welcoming_and_Inclusive_Communities:_Accessibility_Project.
   Google Scholar
• Soldatic, K., Meekosha, H., & Somers, K. (2012). Finding Ernesto: Temporary labour migration and disabled children health. International Journal of Population Research, 2012, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2012/696753
   Google Scholar
• Straimer, C. (2011). Between protection and assistance: Is there refuge for asylum seekers with disabilities in Europe? Disability & Society, 26(5), 537–551. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.589189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: Problem or pseudo-problem? Discourse & Society, 19(6), 821–828. doi:10.1177/0957926508095897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welterlin, A., & LaRue, R. (2007). Serving the needs of immigrants families of children with Autism. Disability & Society, 22(7), 747–760. doi:10.1080/09687590701659600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 197–213). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, H. S. (2011). Not welcome: A critical analysis of ableism in Canadian immigration policies from 1869-2011. Critical Disability Discourses, 4, 1–27.
   Google Scholar