Biofuel Production: Utilizing Stakeholders’ Perspectives

References

• Anex, R. P., Aden, A., Kazi, F. K., Fortman, J., Swanson, R. M., Wright, M. M. … Dutta, A. (2010).Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways. Fuel, 89, S29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awudu, I., & Zhang, J. (2012). Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(2), 1359–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggam, J. (2011). Succeeding with your master’s dissertation: A step-by-step handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Cervone, H. F. (2009a). Applied digital library project management: Using Pugh matrix analysis in complex decision-making situations. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 25(4), 228–232.
   Google Scholar
• Cervone, H. F. (2009b). Strategic analysis for digital library development. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 25(3), 162–166.
   Google Scholar
• Chelst, K., & Canbolat, Y. (2011). Value-added decision making for managers (1). New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Componation, P. J., & Collopy, P. D. (2012). Systems engineering theory: Addressing complesity and uncertainty in space systems architecture. Presented at the AIAA Space 2012 Conference & Exposition, Pasadena, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Componation, P. J., & Nicholls, G. M. (2011). Decision maker perceptions of alternative trade study approaches. The Journal of Reliability, Maintainability, and Supportability in Systems Engineering, 5, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Van Ryzin, G. (2013). Small modular infrastructure. The Engineering Economist, 58(4), 231–264.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. London, UK: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, P., & Alavalapati, J. (2009). Stakeholders’ perceptions on forest biomass-based bioenergy development in the southern US. Energy Policy, 37(5), 1999–2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. (2005). MAUT—Multiattribute Utility Theory. In J.Figueira, S.Greco, & M.Ehrogott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (Vol. 78, pp. 265–292). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• EIA. (2013). Monthely Energy Review. (The U.S. Energy Information Administration) December03, 2013, from Table 1.3 and 10.1, Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=renewable_home
   Google Scholar
• Fawzy, M., & Componation, P. (2014). Biofuel production: Stakeholders’ identification. Journal of Management and Engineering Integration, 7(1), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Tech Manufacturing Institute. (2011, January). NSF Energy Manufacturing Workshop January 2011. Retrieved December 12, 2014 from http://www.manufacturing.gatech.edu/energy/national-science-foundation-energy-manufacturing-workshop/january-2011
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Tech Manufacturing Institution. (2009, March 24–25). NSF Energy Manufacturing Workshop -March 2009. Retrieved December 12, 2014 from http://www.manufacturing.gatech.edu/energy/national-science-foundation-energy-manufacturing-workshop/march-2009
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2013). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, (In Press) 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, M. W. (2009). Scaling laws and technology development strategies for biorefineries and bioenergy plants. Bioresource Technology, 100(24), 6324–6330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvetski, C. W., Lambert, J. H., & Linkov, I. (2011). Scenario and multiple criteria decision analysis for energy and environmental security of military and industrial installations. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7(2), 228–236.
   Google Scholar
• LaClaire, C. E., Barrett, C. J., & Hall, K. (2004). Technical, environmental and economic feasibility of bio-oil in New Hampshire’s north country. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Larasati, A., Liu, T., & Epplin, F. M. (2012). An analysis of logistic costs to determine optimal size of a biofuel refinery. Engineering Management Journal, 24(4), December 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, A., & Schrattenholzer, L. (2001). Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy, 29(4), 255–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos, A., Landeweerd, L., Werf-Kulichova, Z. V., Puylaert, P. G., & Osseweijer, P. (2011). Contrasts and synergies in different biofuel reports. Interface Focus, 1(2), 248–254.
   Google Scholar
• Min, H. (1994). International supplier selection: A multi-attribute utility approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(5), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S. (1991). Total design: Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, T. L. (2010). Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure. Science, 329(5993), 793–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringer, M., Putsche, V., & Scahill, J. (2006). Large-scale pyrolysis oil production: A technology assessment and economic analysis. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Schnepf, R., & Yacobucci, B. D. (2010, July). Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): Overview and issues. In CRS Report for Congress (No. R40155).
   Google Scholar
• Shafiee, S., & Topal, E. (2009). When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished?Energy Policy, 37(1), 181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G., & Speiser, F. (1991). Logical decision: Multi-measure decision analysis software. Golden, CO: PDQ Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, R. M., Platon, A., Satrio, J. A., & Brown, R. C. (2010). Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-liquids production based on gasification. Fuel, 89, S11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya, H., & Kobayashi, O. (2004). Mass production cost of PEM fuel cell by learning curve. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29(10), 985–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. (2014). ENERGY.GOV. Retrieved December 12, 2014 from http://energy.gov/eere/cemi/clean-energy-manufacturing-initiative
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., & Brown, R. C. (2007). Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries. Biofuels, 1(3), 191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. M., Brown, R. C., & Boateng, A. A. (2008). Distributed processing of biomass to bio-oil for subsequent production of fischer-tropsch liquids. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2(3), 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. M., Daugaard, D. E., Satrio, J. A., & Brown, R. C. (2010). Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels. Fuel, 89(1), S2–S10.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, H. L. (2012). The effects of stakeholder values on biofuel feedstock choices. In C.Taylor, R.Lomneth, & F.Wood-Black (Eds.), Perspectives on biofuels: Potential benefits and possible pitfalls (Vol. 1, pp. 29–67). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar