An Approach to Quantify the Factors That Affect Performance Measurement System Implementation

References

• Alonso, J. A., & Lamata, M. T. (2006). Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(4), 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bento, A., & Bento, R. (2006). Factors affecting the outcomes of performance management systems. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2006 Proceedings, 4–6 August, Acapulco, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance measurement: Challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17, 522–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U. S., Mendibil, K., Nudurupatitrevor, S., Turner, T., & Garengo, P. (2004). The interplay between performance measurement, organizational culture and management styles. Measuring Business Excellence, 8(3), 28–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(7), 754–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003a). Implementing performance measurement systems: A literature review. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003b). Why some performance measurement initiatives fail: Lessons from the change management literature. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5(2/3), 245–269.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J. (2002). The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1288–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charan, P., Shankar, R., & Baisya, R. K. (2008). Analysis of interactions among the variables of supply chain performance measurement system implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4), 512–529.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, A., & Kourtit, K. (2013). Performance measurement and management in practice. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(5), 446–473.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, A. A., & Counet, H. (2009). Lessons learned from performance management systems implementations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(4), 367–390.
   Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, M., & Doolen, T. (2007). Alignment at the top: A case study investigating this critical factor in project implementation. Engineering Management Journal, 19(1), 38–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keathley, H., & Van Aken, E. (2013). Systematic literature review on the factors that affect performance measurement system implementation. Paper presented at the Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference, 18–22 May, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Keathley-Herring, H., Van Aken, E., Gonzalez-Aleu, F., Deschamps, F., Letens, G., & Orlandini, P. C. (2016). Assessing the maturity of a research area: Bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics, 109(2), 927–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1222–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change (Vol. 35). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. J., Shea, G. P., & Kvan, T. (1991). CADD implementation: Variables affecting success. Engineering Management Journal, 3(1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mendibil, K., & MacBryde, J. (2006). Factors that affect the design and implementation of team-based performance measurement systems. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 118–142.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A. (1999). The performance measurement revolution: Why now and what next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 205–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1264–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., & Bourne, M. (2000). Why measurment initiatives fail. Measuring Business Excellence, 4(4), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1228–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process (Vol. 4922). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. Paper presented at the 5th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (pp. 12–14), 12–14 August, Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2006). The analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/research/the-analytic-hierarchy-process/
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process—Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(2), 129–157.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance measurement systems—Alternate considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(1), 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwignjo, P., Bititci, U. S., & Carrie, A. S. (2000). Quantitative models for performance measurement system. International Journal of Production Economics, 64(1–3), 231–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., & Cagnazzo, L. (2010). Performance measurement and management: A literature review and a research agenda. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(1), 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tippett, D. D., & Hamilton, B. J. (1992). Key management factors in implementing advanced technologies: A manufacturers survey. Engineering Management Journal, 4(1), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook, J. D., & Utley, D. R. (1995). TQM—The effect of culture on implementation. Engineering Management Journal, 7(2), 31–34.
   Google Scholar