An Integrated Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set Model for Evaluating Circular Low Carbon Suppliers in a Developing Country

References

• Aggarwal, R. (2018). A chance constraint based low carbon footprint supply chain configuration for an FMCG product. Management of Environmental Quality, 29(6), 1002–1025. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2017-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., Ersöz, F., Altaf, B., Basu, A., & Weber, G. W. (2020). Measuring carbon performance for sustainable green supply chain practices: A developing country scenario. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 28(4), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00673-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambekar, S., Prakash, A., & Patyal, V. S. (2019). Role of culture in low carbon supply chain capabilities. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 146–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, C., Sarkis, J., & Dou, Y. (2017). Constructing a process model for low carbon supply chain cooperation practices based on the DEMATEL and the NK model. Supply Chain Management, 22(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2015-0361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I. E., & Omid, M. (2018). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M. (2013). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, C., Caro, F., & Corbett, C. J. (2017). An inside perspective on carbon disclosure. Business Horizons, 60(5), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiral, O. (2006). Global warming: Should companies adopt a proactive strategy? Long Range Planning, 39(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böttcher, C. F., & Müller, M. (2015). Drivers, practices and outcomes of low carbon operations: Approaches of German automotive suppliers to cutting carbon emissions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BP. (2019). BP energy outlook 2019. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/news-and-insights/press-releases/bp-energy-outlook-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDP. (2019). Global supply chain report. Cascading commitments: Driving ambitious action through supply chain engagement. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://www.cdp.net/en/research/global-reports/global-supply-chain-report-2019#671b3beee69d9180412202b6528ec8f7
   Google Scholar
• Celik, E., Gul, M., Aydin, N., Gumus, A. T., & Guneri, A. F. (2015). A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge Based Systems, 85, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogan, D., Good, M., Kantor, G., & McAteer, E. (2008). Corporate governance and climate change: Consumer and technology companies. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Das, C., & Jharkharia, S. (2018). Low carbon supply chain: A state-of-the-art literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(2), 398–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2017-0188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, M. C., Sarkar, B., & Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2011.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Deveci, M., Canıtez, F., & Gökaşar, I. (2018). WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martínez, L. (2019). Interval type 2-based hybrid fuzzy evaluation of financial services in E7 economies with DEMATEL-ANP and MOORA methods. Applied Soft Computing, 79, 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Integrating strategic carbon management into formal evaluation of environmental supplier development programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2021, March 15). What is a circular economy? https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview
   Google Scholar
• Fan, Y. V., Lee, C. T., Lim, J. S., Klemes, J. J., & Le, P. T. K. (2019). Cross-disciplinary approaches towards smart, resilient and sustainable circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1482–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Batista, L., Cherrafi, A., & Rocha-Lona, L. (2019). From linear to circular manufacturing business models. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(3), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Sadaghiani, J. S., & Goodarzi, G. H. (2014). Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75(5–8), 1115–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6142-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2017). A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2016). Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Mina, H., Esmaeili, A., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2020). An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haktanır, E. (2020). Make-or-buy decision using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy COPRAS method. In C. Kahraman, S. Cebi, S. Cevik Onar, B. Oztaysi, A. Tolga, & I. Sari (Eds.), Intelligent and fuzzy techniques in big data analytics and decision making. INFUS 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 1029, pp. 634–643). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_77
   Google Scholar
• Haleem, A., Khan, S., Luthra, S., Varshney, H., Alam, M., & Khan, M. I. (2021). Supplier evaluation in the context of circular economy: A forward step for resilient business and environment concern. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2119–2146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., & Tavana, M. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. W., Kuo, R. J., & Chiou, C. Y. (2014). A multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers in the electronics industry. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(3), 775–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0265-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, P. K., Wong, Y. K., & Chan, F. T. S. (2003). Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138(1–3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00097-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., Sarı, İ. U., & Turanoğlu, E. (2014). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge Based Systems, 59, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D., Mina, H., Nosrati-Abarghooee, S., & Khosrojerdi, G. (2020). Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach. Science of the Total Environment, 722, 137936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazancoglu, Y., Kazancoglu, I., & Sagnak, M. (2018). A new holistic conceptual framework for green supply chain management performance assessment based on circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1282–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2004). Market strategies for climate change. European Management Journal, 22(3), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.011
   Google Scholar
• Kul, C., Zhang, L., & Solangi, Y. A. (2020). Assessing the renewable energy investment risk factors for sustainable development in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., Singh, R. K., & Vaish, A. (2017). Suppliers’ green performance evaluation using fuzzy extended ELECTRE approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(3), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1268-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, R. J., Hsu, C. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2015). Integration of fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(12), 3863–3876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0819-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahane, S., & Kant, R. (2021). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate circular supply chain risks. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 753–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, L. T. H., Hien, D. T. T., Thong, N. T., Smarandache, F., & Giang, N. L. (2023). An ANP-TOPSIS model for tourist destination choice problems under temporal neutrosophic environment. Applied Soft Computing, 136, 110146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, T. P. N., & Lee, T. R. (2013). Model selection with considering the CO2 emission alone the global supply chain. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(4), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0613-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917–7927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. H. (2011). Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: The case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1216–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Fang, H., & Song, W. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection based on SSCM practices: A rough cloud TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memari, A., Dargi, A., Jokar, M. R. A., Ahmad, R., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel, J. M. (2001, July 25-28). On the importance of interval sets in type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In Proceedings Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference (pp. 1647–1652). Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel, J. M. (2003). Fuzzy sets for words: A new beginning. In The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (Vol 1, pp. 37–42). FUZZ ’03., St Louis, MO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel, J. M., John, R. I., & Liu, F. (2006). Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(6), 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.879986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mina, H., Kannan, D., Gholami-Zanjani, S. M., & Biuki, M. (2021). Transition towards circular supplier selection in petrochemical industry: A hybrid approach to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Pardasani, K. R., & Mardani, A. (2019). A novel hesitant fuzzy WASPAS method for assessment of green supplier problem based on exponential information measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H.-T., Md Dawal, S. Z., Nukman, Y., Aoyama, H., Case, K., & Deng, Y. (2015). An integrated approach of fuzzy linguistic preference based AHP and fuzzy COPRAS for machine tool evaluation. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, S., Ballot, E., & Fontane, F. (2013). The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from freight transport by pooling supply networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., Liu, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2017). An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, C., Xiao, X., Xie, M., Goh, M., & Zheng, J. (2017). Low carbon supplier selection under multisource and multi-attribute procurement. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(6), 4009–4022. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-151813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidi, K., & Cullinane, K. (2019). A comparison of fuzzy DEA and fuzzy TOPSIS in sustainable supplier selection: Implications for sourcing strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm, V. B., Cabral, L. P. B., & Schramm, F. (2020). Approaches for supporting sustainable supplier selection-A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8182–8192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Diabat, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theißen, S., & Spinler, S. (2014). Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships: An ANP model for collaborative CO2 reduction management. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theißen, S., Spinler, S., & Huchzermeier, A. (2014). Reducing the carbon footprint within fast-moving consumer goods supply chains through collaboration: The manufacturers’ perspective. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(4), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, C. W., Tzeng, G. H., & Wen, U. P. (2015). A hybrid MCDM approach for improving the performance of green suppliers in the TFT-LCD industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6436–6454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.935829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdecho, M. J., Alarcon-Valero, F., Perez-Perales, D., Alfaro-Saiz, J. J., & Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R. (2021). A methodology to select suppliers to increase sustainability within supply chains. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 29(4), 1231–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-019-00668-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L., & Chin, K. S. (2006). On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15(7), 919–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.006
   Google Scholar
• World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute. (2009) The greenhouse gas protocol initiative: Scope 3 accounting and reporting standard, review draft. WBCSD and WRI,
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2016). An integrated model for green partner selection and supply chain construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2114–2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Zolfani, S. H. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728–3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, H., & Kabak, Ö. (2020). Prioritizing distribution centers in humanitarian logistics using type-2 fuzzy MCDM approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(5), 1199–1232. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, F., Yang, Y., & Chang, D. (2018). Carbon footprint based green supplier selection under dynamic environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 880–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., & Kvederyte, N. (2001). Multivariant design and multiple criteria analysis of a building life cycle. Informatica, 12(1), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.3233/INF-2001-12111
   Google Scholar