A Risk Minimization Model for a Multi-Skilled, Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discrete Time-Cost-Quality-Risk Trade-Off

References

• Afshar-Nadjafi, B. (2014). A solution procedure for preemptive multi-mode project scheduling problem with mode changeability to resumption. Applied Computing & Informatics, 14(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2014.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Afshar-Nadjafi, B. (2021). Multi-skilling in scheduling problems: A review on models, methods, and applications. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 151(November 2020), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107004
   Google Scholar
• Alzarrad, M. A., Moynihan, G. P., Hatamleh, M. T., & Song, S. (2019). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model for time-cost-risk trade-off optimization in construction projects. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7852301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Sedigh, M., Razavi Hajiagha, S. H., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., & Dana, L. P. (2021). A novel time, cost, quality and risk trade-off model with a knowledge-based hesitant fuzzy information: An R&D project application. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172(July), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121068
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K. R., & Trietsch, D. (2018). Network methods for project scheduling. Principles of Sequencing and Scheduling, 453–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119262602.ch16
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, T. A., & Tippett, D. D. (2004). Project risk management using the project risk fmea. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 16(4), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2004.11415263
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabortty, R. K., Sarker, R. A., & Essam, D. L. (2020). Single mode resource-constrained project scheduling with unreliable resources. Operational Research, 20(3), 1369–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0380-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., Liu, X., Lu, S., & Jia, Z. (2021). A variable neighborhood search approach for the resource-constrained multi-project collaborative scheduling problem. Applied Soft Computing, 107, 107480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgoshaei, A., Ariffin, M. K. A., & Baharudin, B. T. (2016). Pre-emptive resource-constrained multi-mode project scheduling using genetic algorithm: A dynamic forward approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management, 9(3), 732–785. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1522
   Google Scholar
• El-Abbasy, M. S., Elazouni, A., & Zayed, T. (2017). Generic scheduling optimization model for multiple construction projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(4), 04017003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauziyah, S., & Susanti, R. (2022). The mitigation of covid-19 in the perspective of contractor for sustainable construction in Indonesia. In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 969, pp. 012071)
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, S., & Briskorn, D. (2021). An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili-Damghani, K., Tavana, M., Abtahi, A. R., & Santos Arteaga, F. J. (2015). Solving multi-mode time-cost-quality trade-off problems under generalized precedence relations. Optimization Methods and Software, 30(5), 965–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556788.2015.1005838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszczyk, M., & Myszkowski, P. B. (2019). Improved selection in evolutionary multi-objective optimization of multi–skill resource–constrained project scheduling problem. Information Sciences, 481, 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberatore, M. J., & Pollack-Johnson, B. (2013). Improving project management decision-making by modeling quality, time, and cost continuously. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(3), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2219586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Fang, D., & Sun, Y. (2016). Cognitive psychological approach for risk assessment in construction projects. Journal Management Engineering, 32(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Zhu, L., & Gao, K. (2020). A genetic programming hyper-heuristic approach for the multi-skill resource constrained project scheduling problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 140, 112915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghsoudlou, H., Afshar-Nadjafi, B., & Akhavan Niaki, S. T. (2017). Multi-skilled project scheduling with level-dependent rework risk; three multi-objective mechanisms based on cuckoo search. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 54, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghsoudlou, H., Afshar-Nadjafi, B., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2016). A multi-objective invasive weeds optimization algorithm for solving multi-skill multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 88, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, A., & Feylizadeh, M. R. (2018). A grey mathematical model for crashing of projects by considering time, cost, quality, risk and law of diminishing returns. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 8(3), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/gs-12-2017-0042
   Google Scholar
• Momoh, A., Roy, R., & Shehab, E. (2010). Challenges in enterprise resource planning implementation: State-of-the-art. Business Process Management Journal, 16(4), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011065919
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. T., Doan, D. T. V., Tran, N. N. C., & Tran, D. H. (2021). A novel multiple objective whale optimization for time-cost-quality trade-off in non-unit repetitive projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1938939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T., & Hadikusumo, B. (2017). Impacts of human resource development on engineering, procurement, and construction project success. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-04-2016-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantouvakis, J. P., & Manoliadis, O. G. (2006). A practical approach to resource-constrained project scheduling. Operational Research, 6(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941258
   Google Scholar
• Pollack-Johnson, B., & Liberatore, M. J. (2006). Incorporating quality considerations into project time/cost trade-off analysis and decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 534–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pour, N. S., Modarres, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2012). Time-cost-quality trade-off in project scheduling with linguistic variables. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(3), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.03.874
   Google Scholar
• Snauwaert, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2021). A new algorithm for resource-constrained project scheduling with breadth and depth of skills. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subulan, K. (2020). An interval-stochastic programming-based approach for a fully uncertain multi-objective and multi-mode resource investment project scheduling problem with an application to ERP project implementation. Expert Systems with Applications, 149, 113189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannady, H., & Maimury, Y. (2018). Increasing the efficiency and productivity in the production of low voltage switchboard using resource-constrained project scheduling. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 11(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2228
   Google Scholar
• Tofollo, T., & Santos, H. (n.d.). Python-MIP: Python mixed-integer linear programming modelling and solution tools. https://www.python-mip.com/
   Google Scholar
• Tran, D. H., Cheng, M. Y., & Cao, M. T. (2015). Hybrid multiple objective artificial bee colony with differential evolution for the time-cost-quality trade-off problem. Knowledge-Based Systems, 74, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, D. H., & Long, L. D. (2018). Project scheduling with time, cost, and risk trade-off using adaptive multiple objective differential evolution. Engineering, Construction & Architectural Management, 25(5), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2017-0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K. D., Feydy, T., & Schutt, A. (2017). Constraint programming applied to the multi-skill project scheduling problem. CP 2017: Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, 2, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66158-2
   Google Scholar
• Zabihi, S., Rashidi Kahag, M., Maghsoudlou, H., & Afshar-Nadjafi, B. (2019). Multi-objective teaching-learning-based meta-heuristic algorithms to solve multi-skilled project scheduling problem. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 136(July), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.032
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., Lin, J., Li, Y. Y., & Wang, Z. J. (2021). A decomposition-based multi-objective genetic programming hyper-heuristic approach for the multi-skill resource constrained project scheduling problem. Knowledge-Based Systems, 225, 107099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar