A Study of MSW and BSW Students' Perceptions of Their Field Instructors

References

• Amacher, K. (1976). Explorations into the dynamics of learning in fieldwork. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 46, 163–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Power, R. (1992). New field instructors' perceptions of institutional supports for their roles. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Vayda, E. (1988). The practice of field instruction in social work.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D., & Spano, R. (1982). Integration of learning in field instruction. In B. Sheafor & L. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work (pp. 226–234). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Faria, G., Brownstein, C., & Smith, H. (1988). A survey of field instructors' perceptions of the liaison role. Journal of Social Work Education, 24, 135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortune, A., Feathers, C., Rook, S., Scrimenti, R., Smollen, P., Stemerman, B., & Tucker, E. (1985). Student satisfaction with field placement. Journal of Social Work Education, 21(3), 92–104.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. (1982). A history of social work field instruction: Apprenticeship to instruction. In B. Sheafor & L. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work (pp. 37–60). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gitterman, A. (1989). Field instruction in social work education: Issues, tasks, and skills. The Clinical Supervisor, 7, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, W., & Gordon, M. (1982). The roles of frames of reference in field instruction. In B. Sheafor & L. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work (pp. 21–36). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, B., Levine-Jordano, N., & Shearer, P. (1991). Working with students' emotional reactions in the field: An educational framework. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 205–216). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, E., Eisikovits, Z., & Maluccio, A. (1988). Enriching social work supervision from the competence perspective. Journal of Social Work Education, 24, 278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, L., & Sheafor, B. (1982). An overview of social work field instruction. In B. Sheafor & L. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work (pp. 3–20). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1991). Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 11–12). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1972). Innovations in teaching styles of approaches based on adult learning. Journal of Education for Social Work, 8, 32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, R. (1971). Differential use of the observed interview in student training. Social Work Education Reporter, 19, 45–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lemberger, J., & Marshack, E. (1991). Educational assessment in the field: An opportunity for teacher-learner mutuality. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 187–197). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, T. (1994). Statistics on social work education in the United States: 1993.. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory.. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, R. (1986). Understanding statistics in the social sciences (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. (1988). Factors associated with student satisfaction in undergraduate social work field placements. In M. Raskin (Ed.), Empirical studies in field instruction (pp. 321–335). New York: Haworth.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, A., & Mayer, J. (1975). Objectionable supervisory styles: Students' views. Social Work, 20, 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, A., & Raphael, F. (1983). The role and function of the faculty field liaison. Journal of Education for Social Work, 19, 62–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, D. (1989). Field instructor turnover. In M. Raskin (Ed.), Empirical studies in field instruction (pp. 187–217). New York: Haworth.
   Google Scholar
• Royse, D. (1991). Research methods in social work.. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenoff, M., & Busa, D. (1981). Student and field instructor as co-therapists. Journal of Education for Social Work, 17, 29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shur, E. (1979). The use of the co-worker approach as a teaching model in graduate student field education. Journal of Education for Social Work, 15, 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1981). A study of the content, context, and skills of supervision.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1982). Skills of supervision and staff management.. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1992). The skills of helping.. New York: Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Sinicrope, R., & Cournoyer, D. (1990). Validity of student ratings of field instruction. Journal of Social Work Education, 26, 266–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolnik, L. (1989). Field instruction in the 1980's—Realities, issues, and problem solving strategies. In M. Raskin (Ed.), Empirical studies in field instruction (pp. 45–47). New York: Haworth.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., Faria, G., & Brownstein, C. (1986). Social work faculty in the role of liaison: Afield study. Journal of Education for Social Work, 22(3), 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanowski, M., & Dwyer, M. (1988). Learning through field instruction: A guide for teachers and students.. Milwaukee, WI: Family Service America.
   Google Scholar
• Zakutansky, T., & Sirles, E. (1993). Ethical and legal issues in field education: Shared responsibility and risk. Journal of Social Work Education, 29, 338–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar