369
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section: Field Education in Social Work

An Evaluation Study of Diversity Training for Field Instructors: A Collaborative Approach to Enhancing Cultural Competence

, &
Pages 27-38 | Accepted 01 Aug 2003, Published online: 10 Jan 2014

References

  • Arkin, N. (1999). Culturally sensitive student supervision: Difficulties and challenges. The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 1–16.
  • Bain, B., & Garcia, E. (1999, February). Field education: Opportunities for expanding vision and competency in working with diversity. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Program Meeting Council on Social Work Education, New York.
  • Bogo, M. (1993). The student/field instructor relationship: The critical factor in field education. The Clinical Supervisor, 11, 23–36.
  • Brown, C. R. (1984). Prejudice reduction workshop trainer's notes.. Washington, DC: National Coalition Building Institute.
  • Carrillo, D. F., Holzhalb, C. M., & Thyer, B. A. (1993). Assessing social work students' attitudes related to cultural diversity: A review of selected measures. Journal of Social Work Education, 29, 263–268.
  • Cashwell, C. S., Looby, E. J., & Housley, W. (1997). Appreciating cultural diversity through clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 15, 75–85.
  • Cook, D. A. (1994). Racial identity in supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 132–141.
  • Cook, D. A., & Helms, J. A. (1988). Visible racial/ethnic group supervisees' satisfaction with cross-cultural supervision as predicted by relationship characteristics. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 268–274.
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2001). Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards.. Alexandria, VA: Author.
  • Cross, T. L., Bazron, B. J., Dennis, K. W., & Isaacs, M. R. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Child and Adolescent Service System Program Technical Assistance Center.
  • Daniels, J., D'Andrea, M., & Kim, B. S. K. (1999). Assessing the barriers and changes of cross-cultural supervision: A case study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 191–204.
  • Fong, R., & Furuto, S. (2001). Culturally competent practice: Skills, interventions, and evaluations.. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Haj-Yahia, M. M. (1997). Culturally sensitive supervision of Arab social work students in Western universities. Social Work, 42, 166–174.
  • Helms, J. E., & Cook, D. A. (1999). Using race and culture in counseling and psychotherapy: Theory and process.. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Julia, M. (2000). Student perceptions of culture: An integral part of social work practice. International Journal of Cultural Relations, 24, 279–289.
  • Kadushin, A. (1991). Introduction. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends.. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  • Kagan, N. (1980). Influencing human interaction—Eighteen years with IPR. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 262–283). New York: Wiley.
  • Kaiser, T. (1992). The supervisory relationship: An identification of the primary elements in the relationship and an application of two theories of ethical relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 283–296.
  • Kaiser, T. (1997). Supervisory relationships: Exploring the human element.. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Leong, F. T., & Kim, H. H. (1991). Going beyond cultural sensitivity on the road to multiculturalism: Using the Intercultural Sensitizer as a counselor training tool. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 112–118.
  • Leong, F. T. L., & Wagner, N. S. (1994). Cross-cultural counseling supervision: What do we know? What do we need to know? Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 117–131.
  • Lum, D. (2003). Culturally competent practice: A framework for growth and action (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Magnuson, S., Norem, K., Jones, N. K., McCrary, J. C., & Gentry, J. (2000). The Triad model as a cross-cultural training intervention for supervisors. The Clinical Supervisor, 19, 197–210.
  • McChesney, M., & Euster, G. L. (2000). Evaluation of an active learning teaching method for field instructor training. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20, 201–215.
  • McMahon, A., & Allen-Meares, P. (1992). Is social work racist? A content analysis of recent literature. Social Work, 37, 533–539.
  • McRoy, R., Freeman, E.M., Logan, S.L., & Blackmon, B. (1986). Cross-cultural field supervision: Implications for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 22, 50–56.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2001). NASW standards for cultural competence in social work practice.. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Orlandi, M. A. (Ed.). (1992). Defining cultural competence: An organizing framework.. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Pederson, P. (1994). Simulating the client's internal dialogue as a counselor training technique. Simulation and Gaming, 25, 40–50.
  • Porter, N. (1994). Empowering supervisees to empower others: A culturally responsive supervision model. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16, 43–56.
  • Raichelson, S. H., Herron, W. G., Primavera, L. H., & Ramirez, S. M. (1997). Incidence and effects of parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 15, 37–48.
  • Shulman, L. (1982). Skills of supervision and staff management.. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
  • Shulman, L. (1993). Interactional supervision.. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • Vander Kolk, C. J. (1974). The relationship of personality, values, and race to anticipation of the supervisory relationship. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 18, 41–46.
  • Van Soest, D. (in press). Structural barriers to multicultural competence in the field practicum. In L. Guiterrez, M. Zuniga, & D. Lum (Eds.), Education for multicultural social work practice: Implications for social and economic justice.. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
  • Walters, G., Strom-Gottfried, K., & Sullivan, M. (1998). Assembling pieces in the diversity puzzle: A field model. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 353–363.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.