REFERENCES
- Anastas , J. W. 2012 . Doctoral education in social work , New York , NY : Oxford University Press . Building Social Work Research Capacity)
- Anastas , J. W. and Kuerbis , A. N. 2009 . Doctoral education in social work: What we know and what we need to know . Social Work , 54 : 71 – 81 .
- Baskind , F. R. , Shank , B. W. and Ferraro , E. K. 2001 . “ Accountability for professional practice: Assessment in social work education ” . In Assessing student competence in accredited disciplines: Pioneering approaches to assessment in higher education , Edited by: Palomba , C. A. and Banta , T. W. 95 – 120 . Sterling , VA : Stylus Publishing .
- Bentley , K. J. Building a community and culture for a successful doctoral program . Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education . Portland , OR . October .
- Boyer , E. L. 1990 . Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate , San Francisco , CA : Jossey-Bass .
- Brooks , R. L. and Heiland , D. 2007 . Accountability, assessment and doctoral education: Recommendations for moving forward . European Journal of Education , 42 : 351 – 362 .
- Dwyer , P. M. 2005 . “ Leading change: Creating a culture of assessment ” . In To improve the academy , Edited by: Chadwick-Blossey , S. and Robertson , D. R. Vol. 23 , 38 – 46 . Bolton , MA : Ankar Publishing .
- Gardner , S. K. 2009 . Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines . The Review of Higher Education , 32 : 383 – 406 .
- Gilbert , R. 2004 . A framework for evaluating the doctoral curriculum . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 : 299 – 309 .
- Golde , C. M. , Jones , L. , Bueschel , A. C. and Walker , G. E. 2006 . “ The challenges of doctoral program assessment: Lessons from the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate ” . In The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes , Edited by: Maki , P. L. and Borkowski , N. A. 53 – 82 . Sterling , VA : Stylus .
- Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education. (2003). Guidelines for quality in social work doctoral programs (Rev.). http://www.gadephd.org/documents/gadeguidelines.pdf (http://www.gadephd.org/documents/gadeguidelines.pdf)
- Gutiérrez , L. M. 2011 . From the editor: Scholarship for social work education . Journal of Social Work Education , 47 : 185 – 187 .
- Harper , S. R. and Quaye , S. J. 2009 . Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations , New York , NY : Routledge .
- Ketefian , S. 2001 . Quality assessment of doctoral programmes . Health SA Gesondheid , 6 ( 2 ) : 46 – 54 .
- Kuh , G. D. 2001 . Assessing what really matters to students: Inside the national survey of student engagement. Change , 33 ( 3 ) : 10 – 17 .
- McKinney , K. 2007 . Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling , San Francisco , CA : Anker Publishing .
- Rust , C. 2007 . Towards a scholarship of assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 32 : 229 – 237 .
- Sakalys , J. A. , Stember , M. L. and Magilvy , J. K. 2001 . Nursing doctoral program evaluation: Alumni outcomes . Journal of Professional Nursing , 17 : 87 – 95 .