Teaching Note—Infusing Social Justice Into Doctoral Programs of Social Welfare: An Incremental Approach

REFERENCES

• Anastas, J. W. (2012). Doctoral education in social work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anastas, J. W., & Congress, E. P. (1999). Philosophical issues in doctoral education in social work: A survey of doctoral program directors. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, M. J. (2014). Social justice and social work: Rediscovering a core value of the profession. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, L., Washington, S., Weinstein, G., & Love, B. (1997). Knowing ourselves as instructors. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin ( Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice: A source book ( pp. 299–310). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnycastle, C. R. (2011). Social justice along a continuum: A relational illustrative model. Social Service Review, 85, 267–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal, K. H., & Hyde, C. A. (2004). Understanding MSW student anxiety and resistance to multicultural learning. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24, 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• De Maria, W. (1992). On the trail of a radical pedagogy for social work education. British Journal of Social Work, 22, 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck-Henderson, A., & Melendez, M. P. (2009). Conversation and conflict: Supporting authentic dialogue in the classroom. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29, 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Funge, S. P. (2011). Promoting the social justice orientation of students: The role of the educator. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(1), 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, B., & Van Soest, D. (2000). Facilitating learning on diversity: Challenges to the professor. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 9(1/2), 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gering, R. E. (2003). Conflicting principles in social work doctoral programs: The effects of unspoken power dynamics. Canadian Social Work Review, 20, 243–257.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, D. G. (1998). Confronting injustice and oppression: Concepts and strategies for social workers. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granruth, L. B. (2009). Justice implications of the proposed federal family and work tax credits: Applying justice theories to policy advocacy. Families in Society, 90, 205–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education. (2003). Guidelines for quality in social work doctoral programs (revised). Retrieved from http://www.gadephd.org/documents/gadeguidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. (2009). The faculty meeting: Practicing social justice-oriented group work. Social Work With Groups, 32, 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Khinduka, S. (2002). Musings on doctoral education in social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 684–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. Y., & Greene, G. J. (2004). A teaching framework for transformative multicultural social work education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 12(3), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, D., & Kirk, S. A. (1992). The continuing crisis in social work research: Conundrum or solvable problem? An essay review. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 370–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubben, J., & Harootyan, L. K. (2003). Strengthening geriatric social work through a doctoral fellowship program. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 39, 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, D. (2014). Program description. Retrieved from http://socialwork.uw.edu/program-description
   Google Scholar
• Nagda, B. A., & Derr, A. S. (2004). Intergroup dialogue: Embracing difference and conflict, engendering community. In W. Stephan & P. Vogt ( Eds.), Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, practice, research ( pp. 133–151). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers (Revised by the 2008 Delegate Assembly). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orme, J. (2003). Why does social work need doctors? Social Work Education, 22, 541–554.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, B. G., & Lehning, A. (2014). Educating social work students about social justice practice. In M. J. Austin ( Ed.), Social justice and social work: Rediscovering a core value of the profession ( pp. 339–356). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schiele, J. H., & Wilson, R. G. (2001). Issues and guidelines for promoting diversity in doctoral social work education. Arete, 25, 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Social Justice Committee (SJC). (2009). Social Justice Committee mission and background. Retrieved from http://socialwork.uw.edu/programs/phd/social-justice-resources/social-justice-committee-mission-and-background
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A. (2002). Social work doctoral education in the United States. New Global Development, 18, 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Tummala-Narra, P. (2009). Teaching on diversity: The mutual influence of students and instructors. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 26, 322–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, D. P., Edwards, S., Gohagan, D., Huff, M., Pereira, A., & Wilson, P. (1998). Preparing social work doctoral students for teaching: Report of a survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest, D. (1995). Multiculturalism and social work education: The non-debate about competing perspectives. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar