Development of Promotion Materials for Social Work Non–Tenure Track Faculty: Internal and External Factors

REFERENCES

• American Association of University Professors [AAUP]. (2006). The status of non-tenure-track faculty. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/report/status-non-tenure-track-faculty
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Universities. (2001, April 10). Non-tenure-track faculty report. Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=466
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. G., & Chronister, J. L. (2001). Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergom, I., & Waltman, J. (2009). Satisfaction and discontent: Voices of non-tenure-track faculty. On Campus With Women, 37(3). Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/ocww/volume37_3/feature.cfm?section=2
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). 2008 statistics on social work education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/CentersInitiatives/DataStatistics/ProgramData/52539/44902.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. R., & Delaney, J. A. (2009). Higher education funding: The new normal. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(4), 60–62. doi: 10.3200/CHNG.41.4.60-62
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G., & Zhang, L. (2005). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? Journal of Human Resources, 40, 647–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farel, P., & Harris, B. (2002). Chancellor’s report of the committee on appointments, promotions, and tenure. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/faculty/faccoun/reports/APTFinalReport.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gappa, J. M., & Leslie, D. W. (1993). The invisible faculty: Improving the status of part-timers in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. G. (2008). Tenure and promotion decisions: The relative importance of teaching, scholarship, and service. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 117–128. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J. (2011). Non–tenure track women faculty: Opening the door. Journal of the Professoriate, 4, 96–123.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, B. A., & Smith, C. (2003). The growth of full-time non-tenure-track faculty: Challenges for the union (Report # 36-0700). Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschik, S. (2008, April 24). Liberation (of adjuncts) theology. Retrieved from http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/24/marquette
   Google Scholar
• June, A. W. (2009, September 10). An activist adjunct shoulders the weight of a new advocacy group. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/An-Activist-Adjunct-Shoulders/48348/
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Sam, C. ( Eds.). (2010). Understanding the new majority of non-tenure-track faculty in higher education: Demographics, experiences and plans of action. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(1), 1–133. doi: 10.1002/aehe.3604
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. S., & Shaker, G. G. (2011). The hybrid and dualistic identity of full-time non-tenure-track faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 1461–1484. doi: 10.1177/0002764211409382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotterman, E. (2011, March 7). Funding for higher education undergoing change. Dakota Wire, p. 1B.
   Google Scholar
• Maisto, M. (2009, September 10). The adjunct’s moment of truth. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/09/10/maisto
   Google Scholar
• May, D. C. (2005). The nature of school of education faculty work and materials for promotion and tenure at a major research university (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/7274/1/DansETD2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morin, K. H., & Ashton, K. C. (2004). Research on faculty orientation programs: Guidelines and directions for nurse educators. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20, 239–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, R., & Flanigan, S. (2012, March 12). Methodology: Graduate health rankings. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/articles/2012/03/12/methodology-graduate-health-rankings
   Google Scholar
• Pankin, R., & Weiss, C. (2011). Part-time faculty in higher education: A selected annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/sociology_fac/1
   Google Scholar
• Reis, R. M. (1997). Tomorrow’s professor: Preparing for academic careers in science and engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press. doi:10.1109/9780470546727
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G., & Maitland, C. (2008). Bargaining for full-time, non-tenure track faculty: Best practices. National Education Association Almanac of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/img/PubAlmanac/ALM_08_06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Salas, A. (2006, April 10). Rising adjuncts, vanishing tenure. Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education Magazine, 16(13), 25–26.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. (2000). State of the profession: Tenure in perspective. Academe, 86(3), 103. doi: 10.2307/40252379
   Google Scholar
• Troia, J. A. (2006). Aligning career ladders and the company vision. Nature Biotechnology, 24, 363–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNC Task Force. (2009, May 8). Report of the UNC Task Force on future promotion and tenure policies and practices. Retrieved from http://provost.unc.edu/files/2012/10/Taskforce-on-Future-Promotion-and-Tenure-Policies-and-Practices-FINAL-REPORT-5-8-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. News & World Report. (2011). 2011: Best graduate schools. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Waltman, J., Bergom, I., Hollenshead, C., & Miller, J. (2012). Factors contributing to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among non-tenure-track faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 83, 411–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. S., & Curtis, J. W. (2006). AAUP faculty gender equity indicators 2006. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2009). Excluded by choice? Contingent faculty and the leadership core. On Campus With Women, 37(3). Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/ocww/volume37_3/national.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Zusman, A. (2005). Challenges facing higher education in the twenty-first century. In P. G. Altback, R. O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumpart (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political and economic challenges (2nd ed., pp. 115–160). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved from http://www.educationanddemocracy.org/Resources/Zusman.pdf
   Google Scholar