Social Work Online Education: A Model for Getting Started and Staying Connected

REFERENCES

• Action Network for Social Work Education and Research. (2009). Social work reinvestment: A national agenda for the profession of social work (Transition document to the new administration). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
   Google Scholar
• Ayala, J. S. (2009). Blended learning as a new approach to social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 24, 277–288.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2012–2013). Occupational outlook handbook, 2012–13 edition, Social Workers. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/community-and-social-service/social-workers.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J., & Kritzer, J. (2009). Strategies for success: Teaching an online course. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Regulation of Post-Secondary Education. (2013). Advancing access through regulatory reform: Findings, principles, and recommendations for the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA). Retrieved from http://www.sheeo.org/resources/publications/final-report-distance-education-commission-advancing-access-through
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2013). Distance education: Distance education offerings by accredited programs. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/cms/39516.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, S., Foels, L., & Chaffin, K. (2013). Comparative analysis of distance education and classroom-based formats for a clinical social work practice course. Social Work Education, 32, 68–80.
   Google Scholar
• Garza Mitchell, R. L. (2009). Ethics in an online environment. New Directions for Community Colleges, 148, 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Grijalva, T., Nowell, C., & Kerkvliet, J. (2006). Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal, 40, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Kent School of Social Work Faculty Retreat. (2012). Minutes of the Kent School of Social Work faculty retreat. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
   Google Scholar
• Keramidas, C. (2012). Are undergraduate students ready for online learning? A comparison of online and face-to-face sections of a course. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(4), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, C., & Watkins, P. (2012). Increasing academic integrity in online classes by fostering the development of self-regulated learning skills. Clearing House, 85, 96–101.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2008). Code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, M., & Otte, G. (2009). An administrator’s guide to the whys and hows of blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14, 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Osguthorpe, R., & Graham, C. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, P., Westhuis, D., Marshall, E., & Chang, V. (2006). The acquisition of social work interviewing skills in a web-based and classroom instructional environment: Results of a study. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(4), 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–07 (NCES 2009–044). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Petracchi, H., Mallinger, G., Engel, R., Rishel, C., & Washburn, C. (2005). Evaluating the efficacy of traditional and Web-assisted instruction in an undergraduate social work practice class. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23, 299–310.
   Google Scholar
• Pontes, M., & Pontes, N. (2012). Enrollment in distance education classes is associated with fewer enrollment gaps among nontraditional undergraduate students in the US. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16, 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2011). Research on adult learners: Supporting the needs of a student population that is no longer nontraditional. Peer Review, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/prwi11/prwi11_RossGordon.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 216–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset: Volume II: Paradox of faculty voices: Views and experiences with online learning. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED517311
   Google Scholar
• University of Louisville. (2007). Raymond A. Kent School of Social Work. Retrieved from http://louisville.edu/kent/ABOUT%20KENT/accreditation/curriculum-description-august-2007
   Google Scholar
• University of Southern California. (2013). Home page. Retrieved from www.usc.edu
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Digest of education statistics, 2011 (NCES 2012-001). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Education Division, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R., Vakalahi, H., Pierce, D., Pittman-Munke, P., & Adkins, L. F. (2009). Distance education programs in social work: Current and emerging trends. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (1999). Invited commentary: Distance education and accreditation. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 326–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, R. O. (2008). Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar