921
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Anastas, J. W. (2012). Doctoral education in social work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bentley, K. J. (2013). Toward an evaluation framework for doctoral education in social work: A 10-year retrospective of one PhD program’s assessment experiences. Journal of Social Work Education, 22, 30–47.
  • Brekke, J. (2012). Shaping a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 455–464.
  • Brekke, J., & Mor Barak, M. (2013, July). Social work science: Dilemmas for identity formation and transformation in doctoral education. Paper presented at the Science in Social Work Doctoral Education Roundtable, Islandwood Education Center, Bainbridge Island, WA.
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2012). 2012 annual statistics on social work education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=68989
  • Fong, R. (2012). Framing education for a science of social work: Missions, curriculum, and doctoral training. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 529–536.
  • Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Walker, G. E. (2006). The challenges of doctoral program assessment: Lessons learned from the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate. In P. L. Maki, & N. A. Borkowski (Eds.), The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes (pp. 53–82). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Goppner, H.-J. (2012). Response: Epistemological issues of social work science as a translational action science. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 542–547.
  • Green, R. G. (2008). Tenure and promotion decisions: The relative importance of teaching, scholarship, and service. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 117–128.
  • Harrington, D., Petr, C. G., Black, B. M., Cunningham-Williams, R. M., & Bentley, K. J. (2014). Quality guidelines for social work PhD programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(3), 281–286.
  • Johnson-Motoyama, M., Petr, C. G., & Mitchell, F. (2014). Factors associated with success in PhD social work programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 50, 548–558.
  • Nurius, P. S., & Kemp, S. P. (2012). Response: Social work, science, social impact: Crafting an integrative conversation. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 548–552.
  • Pollio, D. E. (2012). Response: Training doctoral students to be scientists. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 537–541.
  • Qualtrics Labs, Inc. (2012). Qualtrics version December 2012. Provo, UT: Author.
  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
  • Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Task Force on the DSW Degree Convened by the Social Work Leadership Forum. (2011). The doctorate in social work (DSW) degree: Emergence of a new practice doctorate. Retrieved from http://www.gadephd.org/Portals/0/docs/DSWGuidelines2011t.pdf
  • Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the 21st century. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.