Comparative Analysis of an Online and a Traditional MSW Program: Educational Outcomes

REFERENCES

• Abdous, M., & Yen, C. (2010). A predictive study of learner satisfaction and outcomes in face-to-face, satellite broadcast and live video-streaming environments. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 248 –257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdous, M., & Yen, C. (2011). A study of the predictive relationships between faculty engagement, learner satisfaction and outcomes in multiple learning delivery modes. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 9(4), 57 –70.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States. BABSON Survey Research Group, The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. H., & Friedmann, M. L. (2010). Strategies to teach family assessment and intervention through an online international curriculum. Journal of Family Nursing, 16, 213 –233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, A., & Faul, A. (2007). Reduction of face-to-face contact hours in Foundation Research courses: Impact on student’s knowledge gained and course satisfaction. Social Work Education, 26, 780 –793.
   Google Scholar
• Bielawski, L., & Metcalf, D. (2002). Blended elearning: Integrating knowledge, performance support, and online learning. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brabazon, T. (2002). Digital hemlock: Internet education and the poisoning of teaching. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2012). Distance education offerings by accredited programs. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/cms/39516.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, L., & McCarragher, T. (2007). Delivering a social work MSW program through distance education: An innovative collaboration between two universities, USA. Social Work Education, 26, 376 –388.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, S., Foels, L., & Chaffin, K. (2013). Comparative analysis of distance education and classroom-based formats for a clinical social work practice course. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 68 –80.
   Google Scholar
• DeNeui, D., & Dodge, T. (2006). Asynchronous learning networks and student outcome: The utility of online learning components in hybrid classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 256 –259.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, A., Frey, A., & Barber, R. (2004). The effects of web-assisted instruction in a social work research methods course. Social Work Education, 2, 105 –188.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 41 –61.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., & Anastas, J. (2003). Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work, 39, 425 –440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylton, M. (2006). Online versus classroom-based instruction: A comparative study of learning outcomes in a diversity course. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 11 (2), 102 –114.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger, L. W., & Stretch, J. J. (2000). How hypermodern technology in social work bites back. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 103 –114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligon, J., Marward, M., & Yegidis, B. (1999). Comparing student evaluations of distance learning and standard classroom courses in graduate social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 19(1), 21 –29.
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, J. (2005). Teaching social work online: Dilemmas and debates. Social Work Education, 24, 185 –195.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. M. (2009). WebQuests: A viable solution to meeting the continuing professional education needs of home health care nurses. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 21, 171 –176.
   Google Scholar
• Perlman, C., Weston, C., & Gisel, E. (2010). Enabling meaningful learning through web-based instruction with occupational therapy students. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58, 191 –210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, C. (2011). A decade of social work today—10 trends that transformed social work. Social Work Today, 11(4), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, D. C., Siebert, C. F., & Spaulding-Givens, J. (2006). Teaching clinical social work skills primarily online. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 325 –336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocks, J., & Freddolino, P. (2000). Enhancing computer mediated teaching through interactivity: The second interaction of a world wide web-based graduate social work course. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 505 –518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R., Vakalahi, H., Pierce, D., Pittman-Munke, P., & Adkins, F. (2009). Distance education programs in social work: Current and emerging trends. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 263 –275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. F., & Kalmon, S. (2005). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved from http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/tech/Keeping_Pace2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, D., & Vinton, L. (2006). Evaluation of the first web-based advanced standing MSW program. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 607 –620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woehle, R., & Quinn, A. (2009). An experiment comparing HBSE graduate social work classes: Face-to-face and at a distance. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29, 418 –430.
   Google Scholar
• York, R. (2008). Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 157 –172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar