Student Voices Speak Quality Assurance: Continual Improvement in Online Social Work Education

References

• Anastas, J. W. (1999). Research design for social work and the human services. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. A., & Lawrence, B. (2009). From posts to patterns: A metric to characterize discussion board activity in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals—Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. London, WI: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Teaching Excellence. (2010). 7-item categorization of research findings (Unpublished handout). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.
   Google Scholar
• Coccoma, P., Peppers, C. A., & Molhoek, J. K. (2012). Creativity and wikis: Partnering virtual teams, technology, and social work education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 147–158. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol8no2/coccoma_0612.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coe, J., & Elliott, D. (1999). An evaluation of teaching direct practice courses in a distance education program for rural settings. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 353–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, J. (2004, August, 1). Focus on collaboration and technology will follow. Distance Education Report, 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelis, K. (2009). Online learning: Student perceptions. Retrieved from http://teaching.uncc.edu/learning-resources/articles-books/tip-sheets/student-perceptions
   Google Scholar
• Delialioglu, O., & Yildirim, Z. (2007). Students’ perceptions on effective dimensions of interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Broadcasting Corporation (2004). Constructivism as a paradigm for teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating Web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education, 50, 645–664. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6370-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, H., & Gramling, J. (2009). Learning strategies for success in a web-based course: A descriptive exploration. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2), 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29, 89–106. doi:10.1080/01587910802004860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koszalka, T. A., & Ganesan, R. (2004). Designing online courses: A taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in course management systems (CMS) in distance education. Distance Education, 25, 243–256. doi:10.1080/0158791042000262111
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, A., & Luff, D. (2009). Qualitative data analysis. Nottingham, UK: National Institute for Health Research Research Design Service for the East Midlands/Yorkshire & the Humber.
   Google Scholar
• Lally, V., & Barrett, E. (1999). Building a learning community online: Towards socio-academic interaction. Research Papers in Education, 14(2), 147–163. doi:10.1080/0267152990140205
   Google Scholar
• Legon, R., & Runyon, J. (2007, August). Research on the impact of the Quality Matters course review process. Paper presented at the annual conference of Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Mandernach, B. J. (2009, March). Three ways to improve student engagement in the online classroom. Online Classroom, March, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. A., Helton, L., & Dziegielewski, S. (2010). Psychosocial environmental relationships among MSW students in distance learning and traditional classrooms. Journal of Social Service Research, 36(3), 230–247. doi:10.1080/01488371003707621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaught, C. (2001). Quality assurance for online courses: From policy to process to improvement? In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Proceedings from the annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 435–442). Melbourne, Australia: Biomedical Unit, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on online learning. ASHE –ERIC Higher Education Report, 9(4), 1–134.
   Google Scholar
• Oliaro, L., & Trotter, C. (2010). A comparison of on-campus and off-campus (or distance) social work education. Australian Social Work, 63, 329–344. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2010.496866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. E. (2012). Constructivist pedagogy and symbolism: Vico, Cassirer, Piaget, Bateson. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44, 878–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00765.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Dewey, Vygotsky, and the social administration of the individual: Constructivist pedagogy as systems of ideas in historical spaces. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 535–570. doi:10.3102/00028312035004535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality assurance (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quality%20assurance
   Google Scholar
• Quality Matters. (2013a). Quality Matters program: A national benchmark for online course design. Retrieved June 28, 2013 from https://www.qualitymatters.org
   Google Scholar
• Quality Matters (2013b). Higher education subscriptions. Retrieved July 18, 2013 from https://www.qualitymatters.org/subscriptions
   Google Scholar
• Quality Matters. (2013c). Program rubric. Retrieved July 18, 2013 from http://qmprogram.org/rubric
   Google Scholar
• Ryman, S., Burrell, L., Hardham, G., Richardson, B., & Ross, J. (2009). Creating and sustaining online learning communities: Designing for transformative learning. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(3), 32–45. doi:10.5172/ijpl.5.3.32
   Google Scholar
• Tsay, M., & Brady, M. (2010). A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, S. (2008). Challenging poverty. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 15–17. doi:10.1145/1378704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, R., Vakalahi, H., Pierce, D., Pittman-Munke, P., & Adkins, L. F. (2009). Distance education programs in social work: Current and emerging trends. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 263–276. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar