Intersectionality and Social Work: Omissions of Race, Class, and Sexuality in Graduate School Education

References

• Abrams, L. S., & Gibson, P. (2007). Reframing multicultural education: Teaching White privilege in social work curriculum. Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 147–160. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2007.200500529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, L. S., & Moio, J. A. (2009). Critical race theory and the cultural competence dilemma in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 245–261. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundy-Fazioli, K. (2004). Exploring the distribution of power in child welfare practice: Who holds the power to create change? A qualitative study (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3148025)
   Google Scholar
• Bundy-Fazioli, K., Briar-Lawson, K., & Hardiman, E. (2009). A qualitative examination of power between child welfare workers and parents. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1447–1464. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundy- Fazioli, K., Quijanos, L., & Bubar, R. (2013). Graduate student’s perception of professional power in social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(1), 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baca Zinn, M., & Thorton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331. doi:10.2307/3178416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-On, R. (2002). Bar-on emotional quotient inventory: Short technical manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., Scott-Lincourt, R. S., & Brennan, K. (2008). The real world of the ivory tower: Linking classroom and practice via pedagogical modeling. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 28, 35–51. doi:10.1080/08841230802178854
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2008). Metaphors in qualitative research: Shedding light or casting shadows? Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 274–282. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2010). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through the qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32. doi:10.2307/800672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Towards an Afrocentric feminist epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=13780
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=81660
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (2010). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, Z. (1977). Capitalist patriarchy: The case for socialist feminism. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fargion, S. (2006). Thinking professional social work: Expertise and professional ideologies in social workers’ accounts of their practice. Journal of Social Work, 6, 255–273. doi:10.1177/1468017306071175
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Guido, F., Chávez, A. F., & Lincoln, Y. (2010). Underlying paradigms in student affairs research and practice. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 47, 1–22. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.6017
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M. (2004). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 272–289. doi:10.1177/1049732303260445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, L. M. (1991). Empowering women of color: A feminist model. In M. Bricker-Jenkins, N. R. Hooyman, & N. Gottlieb (Eds.), Feminist social work practice in clinical settings (pp. 199–214). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2007). Feminist research practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. (2013). Council on Social Work Education Commission on Accreditation: Some suggestions on educational program assessment and continuous improvement for the 2008 EPAS. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=31582
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From the margin to center (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulko, W. (2009). The time and context contingent nature of intersectionality and interlocking oppressions. Affilia, 24, 44–55. doi:10.1177/0886109908326814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jani, J. S., Pierce, D., Ortiz, L., & Sowbel, L. (2011). Access to intersectionality, content to competence: Deconstructing social work diversity standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 283–301. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakeoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, NJ: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. New York, NY: The Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800. doi:10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra, G. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Affilia, 25, 417–430.
   Google Scholar
• Moraga, C., & Anzaldua, G. (Eds.). (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York, NY: Kitchen Table Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, K. S. (2000). Metaphor analysis in psychology—Method, theory, and fields of application. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2) [Online]. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002212
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Y., Hunt, V., Zajicek, A. M., Norris, A. N., & Hamilton, L. (2009). Incorporating intersectionality in social work practice, research, policy, and education. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Delegate Assembly. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from http://www.naswdc.org/pubs/ code/default.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, L., & Jani, J. (2010). Critical race theory: A transformational model for teaching diversity. Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 175–193. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2010.200900070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 137–145. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, S. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J. (2006). Understanding power and powerlessness: Towards a framework for emancipatory practice in social work. Journal of Social Work, 6, 33–51. doi:10.1177/1468017306062222
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1986). Domination by economic power and by authority. In S. Lukes (Ed.), Power (pp. 28–36). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yural-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 193–209. doi:10.1177/1350506806065752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar