References
- Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 95–108. doi:10.1007/s1136-007-9168-6
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
- Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=41861
- Council on Social Work Education (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=81660
- Drisko, J. W. (2014). Competencies and their assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 50, 414–426. doi:10.1080/10437797.2014.917927
- Hackett, S., Kuronen, M., Matthies, A.L., & Kresal, B. (2003). The motivation, professional development and identity of social work students in four European countries. European Journal of Social Work, 6, 163–178. doi:10.1080/1369145032000144421
- Hall, T. W., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2007). An item response theory analysis of the Spiritual Assessment Inventory. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 157–178. doi:10.1080/10508610701244197
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
- Toland, M. D. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 120–151. doi:10.1177/0272431613511332