Cultivating a Research Tool Kit for Social Work Doctoral Education

References

• Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55, 193–196. doi:10.4135/9781412985079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455. doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 329–341. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003a). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003b). Overextraction of latent trajectory classes: Much ado about nothing? Reply to Rindskopf (2003), Muthén (2003), and Cudeck and Henly (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 384–393. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Shanahan, M. J. (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In T. Little, J. Bovaird, & N. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 255–283). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., & Trost, K. (2006). The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 601–632. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A., Domitroich, C., Ernst, J., Etz, K., Mason, M. J., Robertson, E., … Ulmer, L. (2011). Standards of knowledge for the science of prevention. Fairfax, VA: Society for Prevention Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S. (2006). The core analytics of randomized experiments for social research. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Bannen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods (pp. 115–133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., & Michalopoulos, C. (2013). When is the story in the subgroups: Strategies for interpreting and reporting intervention effects for subgroups. Prevention Science, 14, 179–188. doi:10.1007/s11121-010-0198-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., Richburg-Hayes, L., & Black, A. R. (2007). Using covariates to improve precision for studies that randomize schools to evaluate educational interventions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 30–59. doi:10.3102/0162373707299550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. H., Wang, W., Kellam, S. G., Muthén, B. O., Petras, H., Toyinbo, P., … Sloboda, Z. (2008). Methods for testing theory and evaluating impact in randomized field trials: Intent-to-treat analyses for integrating the perspectives of person, place, and time. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S74–S104. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (2010). What are randomised controlled trials good for? Philosophical Studies, 147(1), 59–70. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9450-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. L., Muthén, B. O., Kaprio, J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R., & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 681–703. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, A. M. (2009). Employing complier average causal effect analytic methods to examine effects of randomized encouragement trials. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35(4), 253–259. doi:10.1080/00952990903005882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D. (2002). Randomized experiments in educational policy research: A critical examination of the reasons the educational evaluation community has offered for not doing them. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 175–199. doi:10.3102/01623737024003175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R. (1994). Social experiments: Some developments over the past fifteen years. Annual Review of Psychology, 45(1), 545–580. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.002553
   Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 121–136. doi:10.1080/15248371003699969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2016). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trial (NBER Working Paper No. 22595). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22595
   Google Scholar
• Dong, N., & Maynard, R. A. (2013). PowerUp! A tool for calculating minimum detectable effect sizes and sample size requirements for experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 24–67. doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.673143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumville, J. C., Torgerson, D. J., & Hewitt, C. E. (2006). Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 332, 969–971. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7547.969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erosheva, E. A., Matsueda, R. L., & Telesca, D. (2014). Breaking bad: Two decades of life-course data analysis in criminology, developmental psychology, and beyond. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 1, 301–332. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, M. W., & Galinsky, M. J. (2010). Steps in intervention research: Designing and developing social programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 459–466. doi:10.1177/1049731509358424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlert, S., Hall, K. L., & Palinkas, L. A. (2017). Preparing our next-generation scientific workforce to address the Grand Challenges for Social Work. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 8(1), 119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work. (2013). Quality guidelines for PhD programs in social work. Retrieved from http://www.gadephd.org/Portals/0/docs/GADE%20quality%20guidelines%20approved%204%2006%202013%20(2).pdf?ver=2013-06-27-221225-117
   Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2015). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heard, K., O’Toole, E., Naimpally, R. Y., & Bressler, L. (2017, April). Real world challenges to randomization and their solutions. Boston, MA: Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., Barrick, A. L., Williams, C. S., Zimmerman, S., Connell, B. R., Preisser, J. S., … Sloane, P. D. (2007). The effect of ambient bright light therapy on depressive symptoms in persons with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(11), 1817–1824. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01428.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
   Google Scholar
• Kernan, W. N., Viscoli, C. M., Makuch, R. W., Brass, L. M., & Horwitz, R. I. (1999). Stratified randomization for clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(1), 19–26. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00138-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1970). The modern practice of adult education. London, UK: Cambridge Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lanza, S. T., Tan, X., & Bray, B. C. (2013). Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: A flexible model-based approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 1–26. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.742377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21–39. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. Cairns, L. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2008). Latent variable hybrids: Overview of old and new models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 1–24). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55(2), 463–469. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00463.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplus%20user%20guide%20Ver_7_r3_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Pemantle, R. (2015). Standards for experimental research: Encouraging a better understanding of experimental methods. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2, 192–215. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.4
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Odgers, C. L. (2010). Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 109–138. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely-Barnes, S. (2010). Latent class models in social work. Social Work Research, 34(2), 114–121. doi:10.1093/swr/34.2.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. C., Cordray, D. S., Hulleman, C. S., Darrow, C. L., & Sommer, E. C. (2012). A procedure for assessing intervention fidelity in experiments testing educational and behavioral interventions. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 39(4), 374–396. doi:10.1007/s11414-012-9295-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurius, P. S., & Kemp, S. P. (2013). Transdisciplinarity and translation: Preparing social work doctoral students for high impact research. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 625–635. doi:1049731513512375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund-Gibson, K., & Masyn, K. E. (2016). Covariates and mixture modeling: Results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified effects on class enumeration. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 782–797. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1221313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, R. B., Orr, L. L., Bell, S. H., & Stuart, E. A. (2013). External validity in policy evaluations that choose sites purposively. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(1), 107–121. doi:10.1002/pam.21660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, J. E., & Spaulding, W. D. (2007). Heterogeneity in recovery of psychosocial functioning during psychiatric rehabilitation: A exploratory study using latent growth mixture modeling. Schizophrenia Research, 93(1), 186–193. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petras, H., & Masyn, K. (2010). General growth mixture analysis with antecedents and consequences of change. In A. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 69–100). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_5
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, S. J., Assmann, S. E., Enos, L. E., & Kasten, L. E. (2002). Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2917–2930. doi:10.1002/sim.1296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puma, M. J., Olsen, R. B., Bell, S. H., & Price, C. (2009). What to do when data are missing in group randomized controlled trials (NCEE 2009-0049). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED511781.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosato, N. S., & Baer, J. C. (2012). Latent class analysis: A method for capturing heterogeneity. Social Work Research, 36, 61–69. doi:10.1093/swr/svs006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schochet, P. Z. (2008). Technical methods report: Guidelines for multiple testing in impact evaluations (NCEE 2008-4018). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20084018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8, 18. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R. (2010). Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings. Psychological Methods, 15, 3–17. doi:10.1037/a0015916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Sloane, P. D., Zimmerman, S., Chen, X., Barrick, A. L., Poole, P., Reed, D., … Cohen, L. W. (2013). Effect of a person-centered mouth care intervention on care processes and outcomes in three nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(7), 1158–1163. doi:10.1111/jgs.12317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spybrook, J., Bloom, H., Congdon, R., Hill, C., Martinez, A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2011). Optimal design plus empirical evidence: Documentation for the Optimal Design software. Retrieved from http://wtgrantfoundation.org/resource/optimal-design-with-empirical-information-od.
   Google Scholar
• Steinley, D. (2006). K‐means clustering: A half‐century synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 1–34. doi:10.1348/000711005X48266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterba, S. K., & Bauer, D. J. (2010). Matching method with theory in person-oriented developmental psychopathology research. Development and Psychopathology, 22(2), 239–254. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. A., Cole, S. R., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2011). The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 174(2), 369–386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, E., Hedges, L., Vaden-Kiernan, M., Borman, G., Sullivan, K., & Caverly, S. (2014). Sample selection in randomized experiments: A new method using propensity score stratified sampling. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 114–135. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.831154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Breukelen, G. J. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 920–925. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, T., Zimmerman, S., Cagle, J., Reed, D., Cohen, L., Beeber, A. S., & Gwyther, L. P. (2014). Fidelity decision making in social and behavioral research: Alternative measures of dose and other considerations. Social Work Research, 38(3), 154–162. doi:10.1093/swr/svu021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, S., Austin, S., Cohen, L., Reed, D., Poole, P., Ward, K., & Sloane, P. D. (2017). Readily identifiable risk factors of nursing home residents’ oral hygiene: Dementia, hospice, and length of stay. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 5(11), 2516–2521. doi:10.1111/jgs.15061
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, S., Cohen, L. W., Reed, D., Gwyther, L. P., Washington, T., Cagle, J. C., … Preisser, J. S. (2013). Families matter in long-term care: Results of a group randomized trial. Seniors Housing & Care Journal, 21(1), 3–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar