212
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pages 34-49 | Accepted 27 Nov 2017, Published online: 22 Apr 2019

References

  • Barlow, C., & Coleman, H. (2003). Suitability for practice guidelines for students: A survey of Canadian social work programmes. Social Work Education, 22, 151–164. doi:10.1080/0261547022000058206
  • Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 68–75. doi:10.1177/1744987107081254
  • Bridge, G. (1996). Minimising discrimination: A case for excluding interviews from selection for social work courses. Social Work Education, 15, 5–15. doi:10.1080/02615479611220311
  • Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722
  • Bryson, J. M., Patton, M. Q., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001
  • Campbell, J., Campbell, A., & Das, C. (2013). A study of successful applicants’ views of a social work admissions process. Journal of Social Work, 13, 382–399. doi:10.1177/1468017311434876
  • Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (1994). Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policies and accreditation standards. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS.aspx
  • Coyle, J. P., Carter, I. M., & Leslie, D. R. (2011). BSW program admission policies: Is there empirical support for what we do? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 538–551. doi:10.1080/08841233.2011.615277
  • Currer, C., & Atherton, K. (2008). Suitable to remain a student social worker? Decision making in relation to termination of training. Social Work Education, 27, 279–292. doi:10.1080/02615470701381343
  • Elpers, K., & Fitzgerald, E. A. (2013). Issues and challenges in gatekeeping: A framework for implementation. Social Work Education, 32, 286–300. doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.665867
  • Fortune, A. E. (2003). Comparison of faculty ratings of applicants and background characteristics as predictors of performance in an MSW program. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(1/2), 35–54. doi:10.1300/J067v23n01_04
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
  • Gibbs, P. (2000). Screening students out of BSW programs: Responding to professional obligations and institutional challenges. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 149–168). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Gibbs, P., & Macy, H. J. (2000). Introduction: The arena of gatekeeping. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • GlenMaye, L., & Oakes, M. (2002). Assessing suitability of MSW applicants through objective scoring of personal statements. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 67–82. doi:10.1080/10437797.2002.10779083
  • Hagar, H. O. (2000). Admission reviews in baccalaureate social work programs: Is there a role for social work practitioners? In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 279–291). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Holmström, C., & Taylor, I. (2008). Researching admissions: What can we learn about selection of applicants from findings about students in difficulty on a social work programme? Social Work Education, 27, 819–836. doi:10.1080/02615470701737544
  • Koerin, B., & Miller, J. (1995). Gatekeeping policies: Terminating students for nonacademic reasons. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 247–260. doi:10.1080/10437797.1995.10672261
  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lafrance, J., Gray, E., & Herbert, M. (2004). Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. Social Work Education, 23, 325–340. doi:10.1080/0261547042000224065
  • Lietz, C. A., Langer, C. L., & Furman, R. (2006). Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work: Implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 441–458. doi:10.1177/1473325006070288
  • Madden, R. G. (2000). Creating a bridging environment: The screening-in process in BSW programs. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 135–148). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Sharpe, E., Stevens, M., Orme, J., … Crisp, B. (2010). Changes in admissions work arising from the new social work degree in England. Social Work Education, 29, 704–717. doi:10.1080/02615470903342085
  • Matka, E., River, D., Littlechild, R., & Powell, T. (2010). Involving service users and carers in admissions for courses in social work and clinical psychology: Cross-disciplinary comparison of practices at the University of Birmingham. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2137–2154. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp142
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miller, G. (2014). Grade inflation, gatekeeping, and social work education: Ethics and perils. Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 11(1), 12–22.
  • Moore, L. S., & Urwin, C. A. (1990). Quality control in social work: The gatekeeping role in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 4, 113–128. doi:10.1300/J067v04n01_09
  • Munro, E. (1995). Selecting students for a social work master’s degree course. Issues in Social Work Education, 15(1), 21–32.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Reynolds, L. R. (2004). Gatekeeping prior to the point of entry. Advances in Social Work, 5, 18–31.
  • Schmidt, G. (2007). The predictive value of admission criteria in a new bachelor of social work (BSW) program. Canadian Social Work, 9(1), 84–91.
  • Seipel, M. M. O., Walton, E., & Johnson, J. D. (2011). Desired characteristics for MSW students and social work employees: Cognitive versus personal attributes. Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 445–461. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900124
  • Shardlow, S., Scholar, H., Munro, L., & McLaughlin, H. (2011). The nature of employer’s involvement in social work education: An international exploration. International Social Work, 55, 205–224. doi:10.1177/0020872811418993
  • Sowbel, L. R. (2011). Gatekeeping in field performance: Is grade inflation a given? Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 367–377. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000006
  • Sowbel, L. R. (2012). Gatekeeping: Why shouldn’t we be ambivalent? Journal of Social Work Education, 48, 27–44. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000027
  • Sowbel, L. R., & Miller, S. E. (2015). Gatekeeping in graduate social work education: Should personality traits be considered? Social Work Education, 34, 110–124. doi:10.1080/02615479.2014.953046
  • Tam, D. M. Y. (2003). Gatekeeping in bachelor of social work education. Journal of Women in Welfare Education, 6, 51–62.
  • Tam, D. M. Y., & Coleman, H. (2009). Defining criteria on professional suitability for social work practice. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 14, 105–121.
  • Tam, D. M. Y., & Kwok, S. M. (2007). Controversy debate on gatekeeping in social work education. International Journal of Learning, 14, 195–203.
  • Thomas, M., McCleary, R., & Henry, P. (2004). Effectiveness of admission criteria on student performance in classroom and field instruction. Advances in Social Work, 5, 33–46.
  • Urwin, C. A., Van Soest, D., & Kretzschmar, J. A. (2006). Key principles for developing gatekeeping standards for working with students with problems. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26, 163–180. doi:10.1300/J067v26n01_10
  • Wayne, R. H. (2004). Legal guidelines for dismissing students because of poor performance in the field. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 403–414. doi:10.1080/10437797.2004.10672296
  • Wilson, A. L., & Cervero, R. M. (2010). Democracy and program planning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 128, 81–89. doi:10.1002/ace.393
  • Younes, M. N. (1998). The gatekeeping dilemma in undergraduate social work programs: Collision of ideal and reality. International Social Work, 41, 145–153. doi:10.1177/002087289804100203

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.