A Stakeholder Analysis of Admission in a Baccalaureate Social Work Program

References

• Barlow, C., & Coleman, H. (2003). Suitability for practice guidelines for students: A survey of Canadian social work programmes. Social Work Education, 22, 151–164. doi:10.1080/0261547022000058206
   Google Scholar
• Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 68–75. doi:10.1177/1744987107081254
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. (1996). Minimising discrimination: A case for excluding interviews from selection for social work courses. Social Work Education, 15, 5–15. doi:10.1080/02615479611220311
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Patton, M. Q., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., Campbell, A., & Das, C. (2013). A study of successful applicants’ views of a social work admissions process. Journal of Social Work, 13, 382–399. doi:10.1177/1468017311434876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (1994). Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policies and accreditation standards. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, J. P., Carter, I. M., & Leslie, D. R. (2011). BSW program admission policies: Is there empirical support for what we do? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 538–551. doi:10.1080/08841233.2011.615277
   Google Scholar
• Currer, C., & Atherton, K. (2008). Suitable to remain a student social worker? Decision making in relation to termination of training. Social Work Education, 27, 279–292. doi:10.1080/02615470701381343
   Google Scholar
• Elpers, K., & Fitzgerald, E. A. (2013). Issues and challenges in gatekeeping: A framework for implementation. Social Work Education, 32, 286–300. doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.665867
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E. (2003). Comparison of faculty ratings of applicants and background characteristics as predictors of performance in an MSW program. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(1/2), 35–54. doi:10.1300/J067v23n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P. (2000). Screening students out of BSW programs: Responding to professional obligations and institutional challenges. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 149–168). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., & Macy, H. J. (2000). Introduction: The arena of gatekeeping. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GlenMaye, L., & Oakes, M. (2002). Assessing suitability of MSW applicants through objective scoring of personal statements. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 67–82. doi:10.1080/10437797.2002.10779083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagar, H. O. (2000). Admission reviews in baccalaureate social work programs: Is there a role for social work practitioners? In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 279–291). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, C., & Taylor, I. (2008). Researching admissions: What can we learn about selection of applicants from findings about students in difficulty on a social work programme? Social Work Education, 27, 819–836. doi:10.1080/02615470701737544
   Google Scholar
• Koerin, B., & Miller, J. (1995). Gatekeeping policies: Terminating students for nonacademic reasons. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 247–260. doi:10.1080/10437797.1995.10672261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lafrance, J., Gray, E., & Herbert, M. (2004). Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. Social Work Education, 23, 325–340. doi:10.1080/0261547042000224065
   Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., Langer, C. L., & Furman, R. (2006). Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work: Implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 441–458. doi:10.1177/1473325006070288
   Google Scholar
• Madden, R. G. (2000). Creating a bridging environment: The screening-in process in BSW programs. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 135–148). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Sharpe, E., Stevens, M., Orme, J., … Crisp, B. (2010). Changes in admissions work arising from the new social work degree in England. Social Work Education, 29, 704–717. doi:10.1080/02615470903342085
   Google Scholar
• Matka, E., River, D., Littlechild, R., & Powell, T. (2010). Involving service users and carers in admissions for courses in social work and clinical psychology: Cross-disciplinary comparison of practices at the University of Birmingham. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2137–2154. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2014). Grade inflation, gatekeeping, and social work education: Ethics and perils. Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 11(1), 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L. S., & Urwin, C. A. (1990). Quality control in social work: The gatekeeping role in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 4, 113–128. doi:10.1300/J067v04n01_09
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (1995). Selecting students for a social work master’s degree course. Issues in Social Work Education, 15(1), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, L. R. (2004). Gatekeeping prior to the point of entry. Advances in Social Work, 5, 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. (2007). The predictive value of admission criteria in a new bachelor of social work (BSW) program. Canadian Social Work, 9(1), 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Seipel, M. M. O., Walton, E., & Johnson, J. D. (2011). Desired characteristics for MSW students and social work employees: Cognitive versus personal attributes. Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 445–461. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shardlow, S., Scholar, H., Munro, L., & McLaughlin, H. (2011). The nature of employer’s involvement in social work education: An international exploration. International Social Work, 55, 205–224. doi:10.1177/0020872811418993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowbel, L. R. (2011). Gatekeeping in field performance: Is grade inflation a given? Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 367–377. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowbel, L. R. (2012). Gatekeeping: Why shouldn’t we be ambivalent? Journal of Social Work Education, 48, 27–44. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowbel, L. R., & Miller, S. E. (2015). Gatekeeping in graduate social work education: Should personality traits be considered? Social Work Education, 34, 110–124. doi:10.1080/02615479.2014.953046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, D. M. Y. (2003). Gatekeeping in bachelor of social work education. Journal of Women in Welfare Education, 6, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, D. M. Y., & Coleman, H. (2009). Defining criteria on professional suitability for social work practice. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 14, 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, D. M. Y., & Kwok, S. M. (2007). Controversy debate on gatekeeping in social work education. International Journal of Learning, 14, 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., McCleary, R., & Henry, P. (2004). Effectiveness of admission criteria on student performance in classroom and field instruction. Advances in Social Work, 5, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Urwin, C. A., Van Soest, D., & Kretzschmar, J. A. (2006). Key principles for developing gatekeeping standards for working with students with problems. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26, 163–180. doi:10.1300/J067v26n01_10
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, R. H. (2004). Legal guidelines for dismissing students because of poor performance in the field. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 403–414. doi:10.1080/10437797.2004.10672296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. L., & Cervero, R. M. (2010). Democracy and program planning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 128, 81–89. doi:10.1002/ace.393
   Google Scholar
• Younes, M. N. (1998). The gatekeeping dilemma in undergraduate social work programs: Collision of ideal and reality. International Social Work, 41, 145–153. doi:10.1177/002087289804100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar