993
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • America Bar Association. (2003). ABA guidelines for the appointment and performance of defense counsel in death penalty cases. Hofstra Law Review, 31, 913–1087.
  • American Bar Association. (2008). Supplementary guidelines for the mitigation function of defense teams in death penalty cases. Hofstra Law Review, 36(3), 677–692.
  • American Civil Liberties Union. (2014). Racial disparities in sentencing. New York, NY: Turner, J., & Dakwar, J.
  • Andrews, A. R. (2012). American bar association supplementary guidelines for the mitigation function of defense teams in death penalty cases: Implication for social work. Social Work, 57(2), 155–164. doi:10.1093/sw/sws003
  • Barker, R. L., & Branson, D. M. (1993). Forensic social work: Legal aspects of professional practice. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
  • Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2008). The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brandell, J. R. (2010). Theory and practice in clinical social work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Bright, S. (2018). Independence of counsel: An essential requirement for competent counsel and a working adversary system. Houston Law Review, 55(4), 853.
  • Brodsky, S. L., & Terrell, J. J. (2011). Testifying about mitigation: When social workers and other mental health professionals face aggressive cross-examination. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1(1), 73–81. doi:10.1080/1936928X.2011.541206
  • Buchana, S., & Nooe, R. M. (2017). Defining social work within holistic public defense: Challenges and implications for practice. Social Work, 62(4), 333–339. doi:10.1093/sw/swx032
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2018, May 14). Annual survey of social work programs: 2017 annual survey – MSW program section – reference copy. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Research-Statistics/Annual-Program-Study
  • Ghandnoosh, N., & Lewis, C. (2014). Race and punishment: Racial perceptions of crime and support for punitive policies. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project: Research and Advocacy for Reform.
  • Graham, M., & Schiele, J. H. (2010). Equality-of-oppressions and anti-discriminatory models in social work: Reflections from the USA and UK. European Journal of Social Work, 13(2), 231–244. doi:10.1080/13691451003690882
  • Guin, C. C., Noble, D., & Merrill, T. S. (2003). From misery to mission: Forensic social workers on multi-disciplinary mitigation teams. Social Work, 48(3), 362–371. doi:10.1093/sw/48.3.362
  • Harkness, D. (2011). The diagnosis of mental disorder in clinical social work: A review of standards of care. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(3), 223–231. doi:10.1007/s10615-010-0263-8
  • Hudson, J., Core, J., & Shorr, S. (1987). Using the mitigation specialist and the team approach. Champion, 33–36.
  • Hutchinson, E. D. (2015). Dimensions of human behavior: The changing life course (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Kelly, D. (2014). Social work mediation/conflict resolution: The benefits, challenges, and practitioner improvements associated with the use of mediation/conflict resolution in social work practice. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
  • Levinson, J. D., Smith, R. J., & Young, D. M. (2014). Devaluing death: An empirical study of implicit racial bias on jury-eligible citizens in six death penalty states. New York University Law Review, 89(2), 513–581.
  • McCutcheon, K. (2014). Discrimination. Encyclopedia of Social Work. Retrieved from http://socialwork.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/acrefore-9780199975839-e-897.
  • Monahan, E., & Clark, J. (Eds.). (2017). Telling the client’s story: Mitigation in criminal and death penalty cases. Chicago, IL: ABA Publishing.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2015). Social work speaks (10th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • Oliphant, B. (2016, September 29). Support for death penalty lowest in more than four decades. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/29/support-for-death-penalty-lowest-in-more-than-four-decades/
  • People v. R. R., and People v. G. A., 12 Misc.3d 161, 807 N.Y.S.2d 516 (N.Y. Sup. Dec. 22, 2005) (combined cases)
  • Peterson, M. S., & Urquiza, A. J. (1993). The role of mental health professionals in the prevention and treatment of child abuse and neglect. Retrieved from https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/mentlhlth.pdf
  • Phillips, S. (2009). Status disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Law & Society Review, 43(4), 807–838. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00389.x
  • Pierce, G. L., & Radelet, M. L. (2005). Impact of legally inappropriate factors on death sentencing for California homicides, 1990-1999, The empirical analysis. Santa Clara Law Review, 46(1), 1–47. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol46/iss1/1
  • Prison Policy Initiative. (2018). States of incarceration: The global context 2016. Retrieved from https://www.prisonpolicy.org/global/2016.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI4MKc7M-F2wIVzC-BCh2ihA-WEAAYASAAEgLCcPD_BwE
  • Redlich, A., Summers, D., & Hoover, A. (2010). Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 79–90. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9194-8
  • Reed, J. G., & Roher, G. F. (2000). Death penalty mitigation: A challenge for social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20(1–2), 187–199.
  • Rehavi, M. M., & Starr, S. B. (2012). Racial disparity in federal criminal charging and its sentencing consequences. U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center, No. 12-002. Available at SSRN: doi:10.2139/ssrn.1985377
  • Richardson, L. (2017). Systematic triage: Implicit racial bias in the criminal courtroom. Yale Law Journal, 126(3), 862–893.
  • Rivkind, N., & Shatz, S. (2009). Cases and materials on the death penalty (3rd ed.). New York, NY: West Group.
  • Roberts, A. R., & Brownell, P. (1999). A century of forensic social work: Bridging the past to the present. Social Work, 44(4), 359–369. doi:10.1093/sw/44.4.359
  • Schroeder, J. (2003). Forging a new practice area: Social work's role in death penalty mitigation investigations. Families in Society, 84(3), 423–432. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.124
  • Schroeder, J., Guin, C. C., Pogue, R., & Bordelon, D. (2006). Mitigating circumstances in death penalty decisions: Using evidence-based research to inform social work practice in capital trials. Social Work, 51(4), 355–364. doi:10.1093/sw/51.4.355
  • Slobogin, C. (2017). Manipulation of suspects and unrecorded questioning: After fifty years of Miranda Jurisprudence, still two (or maybe three) burning issues. Boston Law Review, 97, 1157–1196.
  • Steinberg, R. (2006). Beyond lawyering: How holistic representation makes for good policy, better lawyers, and more satisfied clients. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 30, 625–635.
  • Steinberg, R. (2013). Heading Gideon’s call in the twenty-first century: Holistic defense and the new public defense paradigm. Washington & Lee Law Journal, 70(2), 961–1048.
  • Tabak, R. (1999). How empirical studies can affect positively the politics of the death penalty. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1431–1447.
  • Taft, B., & Kernan, J. E. (2017, March 24). End the death penalty for mentally ill criminals. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/end-the-death-penalty-for-mentally-ill-criminals/2017/03/24/f079674e-0506-11e7-b1e9-a05d3c21f7cf_story.html?utm_term=.03eda69bc470
  • United States Courts. (n.d.). Criminal cases. Retrieved from http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/types-cases/criminal-cases
  • Walker, R. (2017). Developing case theories: Processes and methods. In E. Monahan & J. Clark (Eds.), Telling the Client’s Story: Mitigation in Criminal and Death Penalty Cases (pp. 161–194). Chicago, IL: ABA Publishing.
  • Workers, N. A. (2008). NASW code of ethics (guide to the everyday professional conduct of social workers). Washington, DC: NASW.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.