Emerging Issues With Remote Faculty

References

• American Association of University Professors Research Office. (2018). Data snapshot: Contingent faculty in Higher Ed. https://www.aaup.org/news/data-snapshot-contingent-faculty-us-higher-ed#.XzDdzUllCqA
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussmann, S., Johnson, S. R., Oliver, R., Forsythe, K., Grandjean, M., Lebsock, M., & Luster, T. (2017). On the recognition of quality online course design in promotion and tenure: A survey of higher ed institutions in the western United States. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 20(1), 1–15. https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring201/bussmann_johnson_oliver_forsythe_grandjean_lebsock_luster201.html
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, A. (2017). An e-learning team’s life on and offline: A collaborative self-ethnography on postgraduate education development. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(1), 33–45. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1817/1780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B. (2018). Online education is a disability rights issue: Let’s treat it that way. Inside Higher Ed. https://insidehighered.com/digital.learning/views/2018/08/29/online-education-disability-rights-issue-lets-treat-it-that-way-opinion
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. G. (2012). Facts and fiction: Lessons from research on faculty motivators and incentives to teach online. In E. Pontes & A. Guelfi (Eds.), E-learning—Engineering on-job training and interactive teaching (pp. 59–82). Intechopen. https://www.intechopen.com/books/e-learning-engineering-on-job-training-and-interactive-teaching
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2018). 2018 statistics on social work education in the United States. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell Baez, J., Marquart, M., Chung, R. Y.-E., Ryan, D., & Gray, K. (2019). Developing and supporting faculty training for online social work education: The Columbia University School of Social Work Online Pedagogy Institute. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39(4–5), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2019.1653419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, S. M., Chaffin, K. M., & Cockerham, C. (2015). Comparative analysis of an online and traditional MSW program: Educational outcomes. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.977170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Saxe Zerden, L., Ilinitch, T. L., Carlston, R., Knutson, D., Blesdoe, B. E., & Howard, M. O. (2015). Social work faculty development: An exploratory study of non-tenure track women faculty. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(4), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1076284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, V. (2011). The isolation of online adjunct faculty and its impact on their performance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.793
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, K., Parga, J., & Wobbe-Veit, L. (2019). Cultivating relationships with agency field instructors: Collaboration in online education. In R. P. Maiden (Ed.), The transformation of social work education through virtual learning (pp. 265–282). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• East, J. F., LaMendola, W., & Alter, C. (2014). Distance education and organizational environment. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.856226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, M., Rhodes, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, M., Maiden, R. P., Smith, W., Wiley, J., & Wood, G. (2013). Launching the virtual academic center: Issues and challenges in innovation. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.843364
   Google Scholar
• Gappa, J., & Austin, A. E. (2010). Rethinking academic tradition for twenty-first century faculty. AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom, 1, 1–20. https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/JAF/2010%20JAF/Gappa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, L. M., Zungolo, E., Lockhart, J. S., Turk, M., & Dean, B. (2014). Successes and challenges of a distant faculty model. Nursing Forum, 49(4), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12060
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, T., Alejandra, J., & Brown, A. H. (2009). The retention of experienced faculty in online distance education programs: Understanding factors that impact their involvement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.683
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. (2015, June 22). I am an adjunct professor who teaches five classes. I earn less than a pet-sitter. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/22/adjunct-professor-earn-less-than-pet-sitter
   Google Scholar
• Haviland, D., Alleman, N. F., & Cliburn Allen, C. (2017). “Separate but not quite equal”: Collegiality experiences of full-time non-tenure-track faculty members. Journal of Higher Education, 88(4), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1272321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Jones, S. (2015). Benefits and challenges of online education for clinical social work; Three examples. Clinical Social Work Journal, 45(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0508-z
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, L. I., Sage, M., & Smyth, N. J. (Eds.). (2017). Technology in social work education: Educators’ perspectives on the NASW technology standards for social work education and supervision. Teaching & Learning in Social Work Blog. https://laureliversonhitchcock.org/
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, L. I., Sage, M., & Smyth, N. J. (2018). Teaching social work with digital technology. CSWE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X. S., & Hsaio, E.-L. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15–30. https://www.infoagepub.com/qrde-issue.html?i=p54c3c5059aa7c
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, J. (2019). Diversity and difference in the online environment. Journal in Social Work, 39(4–5), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2019.1654589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2014). Governance as a catalyst for policy change: Creating a contingent faculty friendly academy. Educational Policy, 28(3), 425–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812465112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, E., & Alperstein, N. (2018). Best practices in planning strategically for online education programs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefield, M. B., Rubinstein, K., & Brown Laveist, C. (2019). Designing for quality: Distance education rubrics for online MSW programs. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39(4–5), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2019.1658691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looser, D. (2017, March 20). Why I teach online. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-I-Teach-Online/239509
   Google Scholar
• MacKeogh, K., & Fox, S. (2007). Strategies for embedding e-learning in traditional universities: Drivers and barriers. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(2), 147–154. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ867112.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mandernach, J., Register, L., & O’Donnell, C. (2015). Characteristics of adjunct faculty teaching online: Institutional implications. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XVIII(1), 1556–3847. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/160404/
   Google Scholar
• McLawhon, R., & Cutright, M. (2012). Instructor learning styles as indicators for online faculty satisfaction. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 341–353. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ988473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuiggan, C. A. (2012). Faculty development for online teaching as a catalyst for change. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ971044
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. (2014). An analysis of cost and cost-effectiveness of faculty development for online teaching. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1), 2472–5730. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i1.389
   Google Scholar
• Milton, S. A., Sinclair, M. M., & Vakalahi, H. O. (2016). Organizational identification: Perspectives of dispersed social workers. Advances in Social Work, 17(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.18060/21014
   Google Scholar
• Nicklin, J. M., McNall, L. A., Cerasoli, C. P., Varga, C. M., & McGivney, R. J. (2016). Teaching online: Applying need theory to the work-family interface. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1187042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, H. G., & Beiber, J. P. (2015). Faculty and online education as a mechanism of power. Distance Education, 36(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, C. (2010). Web-based social work education – Growing support, gaining ground. Social Work Today, 10(5), 8. https://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/092310p8.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Richter, S. L. (2018). Faculty perceptions of online teaching. Conference proceedings. Washington DC: Washington Marriott Wardman Park. https://stti.confex.com/stti/nerc18/webprogram/Paper89786.html
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., Regan, J. A. R., Williams, J. H., Smyth, N. J., & Bogo, M. (2016). From the editor—The future of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1218222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, M. H. (2013). Andragogy and distance education: Together in the new millennium. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 14(1), 4–11. ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/doi:10.1002/nha3.10105
   Google Scholar
• Sage, M. (2013). Distance guest speakers in online synchronous classrooms: Practical and legal considerations. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.831802
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. L., Weiss, E. L., & Wiley, J. L. (2018). Innovative strategies for building community among faculty who teach in virtual environments. Advances in Social Work, 18(4), 1103–1112. http://doi.org/10.18060/21619
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. L., & Wiley, J. L. (2019). The person-in-the-virtual-environment: Building a diverse, engaged, collaborative virtual faculty. In R. P. Maiden (Ed.), The transformation of social work education through virtual learning (pp. 44–59). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. L., Wiley, J. L., & Kaplan, C. D. (2016). Community-building in a virtual teaching environment. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.18060/20875
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: A study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. Educause. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2007/7/bridges-and-barriers-to-teaching-online-college-courses-a-study-of-experienced-online-faculty-in-thirtysix-colleges
   Google Scholar
• Sibirskaya, E., Popkova, E., Oveshnikova, L., & Tarasova, I. (2019). Remote education vs traditional education based on effectiveness at the micro level and its connection to the level of development of macro-economic systems. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(3), 533–543. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1209563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, C. A., Weiss, E. L., Schwartz, S. L., & McLane-Davison, D. (2020). Job satisfaction: A positive attribute of work family integration for female social work faculty. Social Work Education, 40(6), 803–819. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02615479.2020.1724932
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2002). Institutional ethnography. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 17–52). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. B. (2015). Relational dimension of virtual social work education: Mentoring faculty in a web-based learning environment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0510-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Maddox, R., Kratz, S. E., & Wiley, J. (2019). Developing and sustaining an online community of practice in social work education. In R. P. Maiden (Ed.), The transformation of social work education through virtual learning (pp. 1–22). Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Tandy, C., & Meacham, M. (2009). Removing the barriers for students with disabilities: Accessible online and web-enhanced courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841230903022118
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., Roehrich, H., & Grababski, J. (2018). External factors that impact online instructor performance: A study measuring the impact of decision fatigue & Quality Matters recognition of courses on online instructor evaluation. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 21(3). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall213/taylor_roehrich_grabanski213.html
   Google Scholar
• Terosky, A. L., & Heasley, C. (2011). Supporting online faculty through a sense of community and collegiality. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 147–161. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067522.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolfinger, N. H., Mason, M., & Goulden, M. (2009). Staying in the game: Gender, family formation and alternative trajectories in the academic life course. Social Forces, 8(3), 1591–1621. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0182
   Google Scholar
• Wood, F. G. (2016). Where are all the faculty? Fulfilling the traditional faculty role at a distance. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(4), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar