The environmental Porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption

References

• Albrecht , J. A. 1998a . Environmental costs and competitiveness. A product-specific test of the Porter hypothesis , SSRN eLibrary . http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers/.cfm?abstract_id=137953 (accessed January 23, 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht , J. A. 1998b . Environmental regulation, comparative advantage and the Porter hypothesis , SSRN eLibrary . http://papers.ssrn.com/sol/papers/.cfm?abstract_id=135608 (accessed January 23, 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Alpay , E. , Buccola , S. and Kerkvliet , J. 2002 . Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing . American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 84 ( 4 ) : 887 – 901 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambec , S. and Barla , P. 2002 . A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis . Economic Letters , 75 ( 3 ) : 355 – 60 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambec , S. and Barla , P. 2005 . Can environmental regulations be good for business? An assessment of the porter hypothesis , Universit Laval-Dpartement d'conomique . Cahiers de recherche 0505
   Google Scholar
• Ambec , S. and Lanoie , P. 2007 . “ When and why does it pay to be green? ” . Montreal Technical Report 2007–2005, Working Paper GAEL
   Google Scholar
• Ayres , R. U. 1994 . On economic disequilibrium and free lunch . Environmental and Resource Economics , 4 ( 5 ) : 435 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Barrett , S. 1994 . Strategic environmental policy and international trade . Journal of Public Economics , 54 ( 3 ) : 325 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Berman , E. and Bui , L. T.M. 2001 . Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries . The Review of Economics and Statistics , 83 ( 3 ) : 498 – 510 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd , G. A. , Tolley , G. and Pang , J. 2002 . Plant level productivity, efficiency and environmental performance of the container glass industry . Environmental and Resource Economics , 23 : 29 – 43 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries , F. and Withagen , C. 2005 . Innovation and environmental stringency: The case of sulfur dioxide abatement , Tilburg : Tilburg University . Technical Report 2005–2018
   Google Scholar
• Feess , E. and Taistra , G. 2000 . Porter's hypothesis on environmental policy in an oligopoly model with cost asymmetry caused by innovation . Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik , 220 ( 1 ) : 18 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Feichtinger , G. , Hartl , R. , Kort , P. and Veliov , V. 2005 . Environmental policy, the Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: Effects of learning and technological progress . Journal of the Environmental Economics and Management , 50 : 434 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Fudenberg , D. and Tirole , J. 1985 . Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology . Review of Economic Studies , 52 ( 3 ) : 383 – 401 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudenberg , D. and Tirole , J. 1987 . Understanding rent dissipation: On the use of game theory in industrial organisation . American Economic Review , 77 ( 2 ) : 176 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Greaker , M. 2003 . Strategic environmental policy; eco-dumping or a green strategy? . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 45 ( 3 ) : 692 – 707 .
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe , H. 2002 . The timing of new technology adoption: theoretical models and empirical evidence . The Manchester School , 70 ( 1 ) : 56 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner , M. 2001 . Sleeping process patents and environmental innovation . Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik , 222 ( 6 ) : 706 – 18 .
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Energy-Efficient Lighting (IAEEL) . 1999 . “ IAEEL Newsletter ” . IAEEL website. http://www.iaeel.org/
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson , L. H. 2005 . Abatement costs in response to the Swedish charge on nitrogen oxide emissions . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 50 : 102 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe , A. B. and Palmer , K. 1997 . Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study . The Review of Economics and Statistics , 79 ( 4 ) : 610 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein , M. and Rothfels , J. 1999 . Can environmental regulation of X-inefficient firms create a ‘double dividend’? , Halle : Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle . Technical Report 103
   Google Scholar
• Kumar , S. and Rao , D. N. 2003 . Environmental regulation and production efficiency: A case study of the thermal-power sector in India . The Journal of Energy and Development , 29 ( 1 ) : 81 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Lanoie , P. , Patry , M. and Lajeunesse , R. 2001 . “ Environmental regulation and productivity: New findings on the Porter analysis ” . Montreal CIRANO WP 2001s-53
   Google Scholar
• Managi , S. 2004 . Competitiveness and environmental policies for agriculture: Testing the Porter hypothesis . International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Goveranance and Ecology , 3 ( 3–4 ) : 309 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Managi , S. , Opaluch , J. J. , Jin , D. and Grigalunas , T. A. 2005 . Environmental regulations and technological change in the offshore oil and gas industry . Land Economics , 81 ( 2 ) : 303 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marklund , P.-O. 2003 . Environmental regulation and firm efficiency: Studying the Porter hypothesis using a directional output distance function , Umea University, Department of Economics . Umea Economic Studies 619
   Google Scholar
• Mohr , R. D. 2002 . Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 43 ( 1 ) : 158 – 68 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murty , M. N. and Kumar , S. 2003 . Win-win opportunities and environmental regulation: Testing of Porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries . Journal of Environmental Management , 67 ( 2 ) : 139 – 44 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osang , T. and Nandy , A. 2003 . Environmental regulation of polluting firms: Porter's hypothesis revisited . Brazilian Journal of Business Economics , 3 ( 3 ) : 128 – 48 .
   Google Scholar
• Palmer , K. , Oates , W. E. and Portney , P. R. 1995 . Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm . Journal of Economic Perspectives , 9 ( 4 ) : 119 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp , D. 2005 . Uncertain R&D and the porter hypothesis . Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy , 4 ( 1 ) : 1 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Porter , M. E. 1991 . America's green strategy . Scientific American , 264 ( 4 ) : 168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter , M. E. and van der Linde , C. 1995a . Toward a concept of the environment competitiveness relationship . Journal of Economic Perspectives , 9 ( 4 ) : 97 – 118 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter , M. and van der Linde , C. 1995b . Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate . Harvard Business Review , 73 ( 5 ) : 120 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinganum , J. F. 1981 . On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach . Review of Economic Studies , 48 ( 3 ) : 395 – 405 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger-Schluga , T. 2003 . Some micro-evidence on the ‘Porter Hypothesis’ from Austrian VOC emission standards . Growth and Change , 14 ( 3 ) : 359 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Schmutzler , A. 2001 . Environmental regulations and managerial myopia . Environmental and Resource Economics , 18 ( 1 ) : 87 – 100 .
   Google Scholar
• Simpson , D. R. and Bradford , R. L. III . 1996 . Taxing variable cost: Environmental regulation as industrial policy . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 30 ( 3 ) : 282 – 300 .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , V. K. and Walsh , R. 2000 . Do painless environmental policies exist? . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 21 ( 1 ) : 73 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Steger , U. , Achterberg , W. , Blok , K. , Bode , H. , Frenz , W. , Gather , C. , Hanekamp , G. , Imboden , D. , Jahnke , M. , Kost , M. , Kurz , R. , Nutzinger , H. G. and Ziesemer , T. H. 2004 . Sustainable Development and Innovation in the Energy Sector , Berlin : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Tirole , J. 1988 . The theory of industrial organisation , Cambridge, Massachusetts : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ulph , A. 1996a . Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 30 ( 3 ) : 265 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulph , A. 1996b . “ Strategic environmental policy and international trade – the role of market conduct ” . In Environmental Policy and Market Structure , Edited by: Carraro , C. , Katsoulaeos , Y. and Xepapadeas , A. 99 – 127 . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Wossink , A. and Weferink , F. 2003 . Hot spots in animal agriculture, emerging federal environmental policies and the potential for efficiency and innovation offsets . Journal of Agricultural Resources, governance and Ecology , 2 ( 3–4 ) : 228 – 42 .
   Google Scholar
• Xepapadeas , A. and de Zeeuw , A. 1999 . Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 37 : 165 – 82 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar