The vulnerability of patent value determinants

References

• Albert , M. , Avery , D. , Narin , F. and McAllister , P. 1991 . Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents . Research Policy , 20 ( 3 ) : 251 – 9 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison , J. and Lemley , M. 1998 . Empirical evidence on the validity of litigated patents . AIPLA Quarterly Journal , 26 ( 3 ) : 187 – 275 .
   Google Scholar
• Allison , J. , Lemley , M. , Moore , K. and Trunkey , R. 2003 . Valuable patents. Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics . Working Paper Series, no. 6907
   Google Scholar
• Arora , A. , Ceccagnoli , M. and Cohen , W. 2004 . R&D and the patent premium . INSEAD Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Austin , D. 1993 . An event-study approach to measuring innovative output: The case of biotechnology . American Economic Review , 83 ( 2 ) : 253 – 8 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen , J. 2006 . The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics . Research on Innovation Working Paper. http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patval.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Betran , F. 2005 . Pricing patents through citation . University of Iowa Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Blind , K. , Cremers , K. and Mueller , E. 2007 . The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios . ZEW Discussion Paper No 07-013
   Google Scholar
• Bloom , N. and van Reenen , J. 2002 . Patents, real options and firm performance . Economic Journal , 112 : 97 – 116 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth , D. and Rogers , M. 2001 . Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms . Economic Record , 77 ( 239 ) : 323 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusoni , S. , Crespi , G. , Francoz , D. , Gambardella , A. , Garcia-Fontes , W. , Geuna , A. Giuri , P. 2006 . Everything you always wanted to know about inventors, but never asked: Evidence from the PatVal-EU survey . CEPR Discussion Paper 5752
   Google Scholar
• Calderini , M. and Scellato , G. 2004 . Intellectual property rights as strategic assets: The case of European patent opposition in the telecommunications industry . CESPRI Working Paper 158
   Google Scholar
• Campbell , R. and Nieves , N. 1979 . Technology indicators based on patent data: The case of catalytic convertors. Phase I Report, Design and Demonstration, Batelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories .
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter , M. , Cooper , M. and Narin , F. 1980 . Linkage between basic research literature and patents . Research Management , 3 : 30 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter , M. and Narin , F. 1983 . Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence . World Patent Information , 5 ( 3 ) : 180 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter , M. , Narin , F. and Woolf , P. 1981 . Citation rates to technologically important patents . World Patent Information , 3 ( 4 ) : 160 – 3 .
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn , I. and Griliches , Z. 1988 . Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market's valuation of R&D and patents . American Economic Review , 78 ( 2 ) : 419 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , W. , Nelson , R. and Walsh , J. 2000 . Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent or not . NBER Working Papers 7552
   Google Scholar
• Cornelli , F. and Schankerman , M. 1999 . Patent renewals and R&D incentives . RAND Journal of Economics , 30 ( 2 ) : 197 – 213 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremers , K. 2004 . Determinants of patent litigation in Germany . ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-72
   Google Scholar
• Crépon , B. , Duguet , E. and Kabla , I. 1996 . “ Schumpeterian conjectures: A moderate support from various innovation measures ” . In Determinants of innovation: The message from new indicators , Edited by: Kleinknecht , A. 63 – 98 . London : Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki , D. , Hall , B. and Oriani , R. 2005 . The market valuation of knowledge assets in US and European firms. Berkeley Working Paper .
   Google Scholar
• Deng , Y. 2005 . Renewal study of European patents: A three-country comparison. Southern Methodist University of Dallas Working Paper .
   Google Scholar
• Dernburg , T. and Gharrity , N. 1961 . A statistical analysis of patent renewal data for three countries . Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Journal , 5 : 340 – 61 .
   Google Scholar
• Dernis , H. , Guellec , D. and van Pottelsberghe , B. 2001 . Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output . OECD STI Review , 27 : 129 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Dernis , H. and Khan , M. 2004 . Triadic patent families methodology . OECD STI Working Paper 2004/2
   Google Scholar
• Dixon , P. and Greenhalgh , C. 2002 . “ The economics of intellectual property: A review to identify themes for future research ” . Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre, Working Paper No. 05102, University of Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Duguet , E. and Iung , N. 1997 . “ R&D investment, patent life and patent value: An econometric analysis at the firm level ” . Working Paper G9705, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques
   Google Scholar
• EPO . 2006 . “ EPO worldwide patent statistical database (PATSTAT) ” . European Patent Office, April
   Google Scholar
• Gallini , N. T. 1992 . Patent policy and costly imitation . RAND Journal of Economics , 23 ( 1 ) : 52 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambardella , A. 2005 . “ Assessing the market for technology in Europe. Report to the European Patent Office ” . European Patent Office, October
   Google Scholar
• Gambardella , A. , Harhoff , D. and Verspagen , B. The value of patents . Presented at the EPIP Conference . September , Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert , R. and Shapiro , C. 1990 . Optimal patent length and breadth . RAND Journal of Economics , 21 ( 1 ) : 106 – 12 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham , S. , Hall , B. , Harhoff , D. and Mowery , D. 2002 . Post-issue patent ‘quality control’: A comparative study of US patent re-examinations and European oppositions. NBER WP 8807 .
   Google Scholar
• Greene , J. R. and Scotchmer , S. 1995 . On the division of profit in sequential innovation . RAND Journal of Economics , 26 ( 1 ) : 20 – 33 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh , C. and Rogers , M. 2006 . The value of innovation: The interaction of competition, R&D and IP . Research Policy , 35 : 562 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh , C. and Rogers , M. 2007 . “ The value of intellectual property rights to firms ” . Working Paper, University of Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths , W. , Jensen , P. and Webster , E. 2005 . “ The effects on firm profits of the stock of intellectual property rights ” . Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper No. 05/05
   Google Scholar
• Griliches , Z. 1981 . Market value, R&D, and patents . Economic Letters , 7 : 183 – 7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches , Z. 1990 . Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey . Journal of Economic Literature , 28 ( 4 ) : 1661 – 707 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches , Z. , Pakes , A. and Hall , B. 1986 . The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity . NBER Working Paper 2083
   Google Scholar
• Guellec , D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 2000 . Applications, grants and the value of patent . Economics Letters , 69 ( 1 ) : 109 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guellec , D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 2001 . The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data . Research Policy , 30 ( 8 ) : 1253 – 66 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guellec , D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 2002 . The value of patents and patenting strategies: Countries and technology areas patterns . Economics of Innovation and New Technology , 11 ( 2 ) : 133 – 48 .
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn , J. and Cloodt , M. 2003 . Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? . Research Policy , 32 : 1365 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall , B. 1999 . Innovation and market value . NBER Working Paper No. 6984
   Google Scholar
• Hall , B. , Graham , S. , Harhoff , D. and Mowery , D. 2003 . Prospects for improving U.S. patent quality via post-grant opposition . NBER Working Paper 9731
   Google Scholar
• Hall , B. and Harhoff , D. 2004 . Post-grant reviews in the U.S. patent system: Design choices and expected impact . LMU Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Hall , B. , Jaffe , A. and Trajtenberg , M. 2001 . The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools . NBER Working Paper 8498
   Google Scholar
• Hall , B. , Jaffe , A. and Trajtenberg , M. 2005 . Market value and patent citations . RAND Journal of Economics , 36 : 16 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall , B. and MacGarvie , M. 2006 . The private value of software patents . Berkeley Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Hall , B. , Thoma , G. and Torrisi , S. 2007 . The market value of patents and R&D: Evidence from European firms . CESPRI Working Paper 186
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff , D. Patent constructionism: Exploring the microstructure of patent portfolios . Presentation prepared for the EPO/OECD Conference on Patent Statistics for Policy Decision Making . October 23–24 , Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D. 2008. Patent citations datafile. http://www.inno-tec.bwl.uni-muenchen.de/personen/ professoren/harhoff/ (accessed 1 March 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff , D. and Hall , B. 2002 . Intellectual property strategy in the global cosmetics industry. LMU Working Paper .
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff , D. , Narin , F. , Scherer , F. and Vopel , K. 1999 . Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions . Review of Economics and Statistics , 81 ( 3 ) : 511 – 5 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff , D. and Reitzig , M. 2004 . Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants – the case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals . International Journal of Industrial Organization , 22 ( 4 ) : 443 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff , D. , Scherer , F. and Vopel , K. 2002 . Citations, family size, opposition and value of patent rights . Research Policy , 32 ( 8 ) : 1343 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff , D. , Scherer , F. and Vopel , K. 2003 . “ Exploring the tail of patented invention value distributions ” . In Economics, law and intellectual property: Seeking strategies for research and teaching in a developing field , Edited by: Granstrand , Ove . 279 – 309 . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publisher .
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff , D. , von Graevenitz , G. and Wagner , S. European patent thickets: Do they exist, do they matter? . Paper presented at the Second EPIP Conference . September , Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter , L. , Webster , E. and Wyatt , A. 2005 . Measuring intangible capital: A review of current practice . Australian Accounting Review , 15 ( 36 ) : 4 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe , A. , Trajtenberg , M. and Fogarty , M. 2000 . The meaning of patent citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western Reserve survey of patentees. NBER Working Paper 7631 .
   Google Scholar
• Jerak , A. and Wagner , S. 2003 . Modeling probabilities of patent oppositions in a Bayesian semiparametric regression framework. LMU Working Paper .
   Google Scholar
• Kamien , M. and Tauman , Y. 1986 . Fees versus royalties and the private value of patents . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 101 ( 3 ) : 471 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht , A. , van Montfort , K. and Brouwer , E. 2002 . The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators . Economics of Innovation and New Technologies , 11 ( 2 ) : 109 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Klemperer , P. 1990 . How broad should the scope of patent protection be . RAND Journal of Economics , 21 ( 1 ) : 113 – 30 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum , S. and Lerner , J. 1999 . What is behind the recent surge in patenting . Research Policy , 28 ( 1 ) : 1 – 22 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer , M. 1998 . Patent buyouts: A mechanism for encouraging innovation . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 113 ( 4 ) : 1137 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw , J. 1993 . Patent protection: Of what value and for how long? NBER Working Paper .
   Google Scholar
• Lanjouw , J. 1998 . Patent protection in the shadow of infringement: Simulation estimations of patent value . Review of Economic Studies , 65 ( 4 ) : 671 – 710 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw , J. , Pakes , A. and Putnam , J. 1998 . How to count patents and value intellectual property: Uses of patent renewal and application data . Journal of Industrial Economics , 46 ( 4 ) : 405 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw , J. and Schankerman , M. 1997 . Stylised facts of patent litigation: Value, scope and ownership . NBER Working Paper 6297
   Google Scholar
• Lanjouw , J. and Schankerman , M. 1999 . The quality of ideas: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators . NBER Working Paper 7345
   Google Scholar
• Lanjouw , J. and Schankerman , M. 2001 . Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition . RAND Journal of Economics , 32 ( 1 ) : 129 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw , J. and Schankerman , M. 2004 . Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators . Economic Journal , 114 : 441 – 65 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner , J. 1994 . The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis . RAND Journal of Economics , 25 ( 2 ) : 319 – 33 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merges , R. and Nelson , R. 1990 . On the complex economics of patent scope . Columbia Law Review , 90 ( 4 ) : 839 – 916 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer , M. and Tang , P. 2005 . Can one measure the value of university patents? Exploring universities’ IP management practices and their implications for estimating patent value. SPRU Working Paper A292 .
   Google Scholar
• Nagaoka , S. 2004 . “ Do speed, science linkage, focus and new entry matter in IT inventions? Institute of Innovation Research ” . Hitotsubashi University Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Narin , F. , Noma , E. and Perry , R. 1987 . Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength . Research Policy , 16 ( 2–4 ) : 143 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel , M. and Schankerman , M. 2006 . “ Strategic patenting and software innovation ” . CEPR Working Paper 5701
   Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue , T. , Scotchmer , S. and Thisse , J. F. 1998 . Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress . Journal of Economics & Management Strategy , 7 ( 1 ) : 1 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2004. Triadic patent families. OECD Working Paper, January
   Google Scholar
• Pakes , A. 1986 . Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks . Econometrica , 54 ( 4 ) : 755 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, A., and M. Schankerman. 1984. The rate of obsolescence of knowledge, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. NBER Working Paper 0346
   Google Scholar
• Pakes , A. and Simpson , M. 1989 . Patent renewal data . Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics , 1989 : 331 – 401 .
   Google Scholar
• Palangkaraya, A., P. Jensen, and E. Webster. 2005. Determinants of international patent examination outcomes. Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper 09/05
   Google Scholar
• Palomeras, N. 2003. Sleeping patents: Any reason to wake up? IESE Working Paper 506
   Google Scholar
• Priest , G. and Klein , B. 1984 . The selection of disputes for litigation . Journal of Legal Studies , 8 : 1 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam , J. 1996 . The value of international patent rights , Connecticut, NJ : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Reitzig , M. The private values of ‘thicket’ patenting: An empirical study across industries and patent types . Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference on ‘Industrial Dynamics of the New and Old Economy – who is embracing whom?’ . June 6–8 , Copenhagen/Elsinore, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Reitzig , M. 2003 . What determines patent value? Insights from the semiconductor industry . Research Policy , 32 ( 1 ) : 13 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitzig , M. 2004a . Improving patent valuations for management purposes – validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales . Research Policy , 33 ( 6–7 ) : 939 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitzig , M. What do patent indicators really measure? A structural test of ‘novelty’ and ‘inventive step’ as determinants of patent profitability . Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2004 . June 14–16 , Elsinore, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Sapsalis , E. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 2007 . The institutional sources of knowledge and the value of academic patents . Economics of Innovation and New Technology , 16 ( 2 ) : 139 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Sapsalis , E. , van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. and Navon , R. 2006 . Academic vs industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value . Research Policy , 35 ( 10 ) : 1631 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saragossi , S. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 2003 . What patent data reveal about universities: The case of Belgium . Journal of Technology Transfer , 28 ( 1 ) : 47 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• Schankerman , M. 1998 . How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field . RAND Journal of Economics , 29 ( 1 ) : 77 – 107 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schankerman , M. and Pakes , A. 1986 . Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post- period 1950 . The Economic Journal , 96 ( 384 ) : 1052 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer , F. M. 1965 . Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions . American Economic Review , 55 : 1097 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer , F. M. , Harhoff , D. and Kukies , J. 2000 . Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation . Journal of Evolutionary Economics , 10 : 175 – 200 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. 2006. The determinants of patent applications outcomes – does experience matter? Copenhagen Business School Working Paper, CEBR
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. 2007. How important are non-corporate patents? A comparative analysis using patent citations data. Copenhagen Business School Working Paper, CEBR
   Google Scholar
• Scotchmer , S. 1999 . On the optimality of the patent renewal system . RAND Journal of Economics , 30 ( 2 ) : 181 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotchmer , S. and Green , J. 1990 . Novelty and disclosure in patent law . The RAND Journal of Economics , 21 ( 1 ) : 131 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, C. 2005. The market for intellectual property: Evidence from the transfer of patents. Mimeo, University of Minnesota and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
   Google Scholar
• Shane , H. 2001 . Technological opportunities and new firm creation . Management Science , 47 ( 2 ) : 205 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane , H. and Klock , M. 1997 . The relation between patent citations and Tobin's Q in the semiconductor industry . Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting , 9 : 131 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Sherry , E. and Teece , D. 2004 . Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation . Research Policy , 33 : 179 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg, G., and B. Verspagen. 2004. The size distribution of innovations revisited: An application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance. MERIT Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Stevnsborg , N. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 2007 . “ Patenting procedures and filing strategies ” . In The Economics of the European Patent System , Edited by: Guellec , D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 155 – 83 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan , R. 1994 . Estimates of the value of patent rights in Great Britain and Ireland, 1852–1876 . Economica, New Series , 61 ( 241 ) : 37 – 58 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece , D. J. 1986 . Profiting from technological innovation . Research Policy , 15 ( 6 ) : 285 – 305 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece , D. J. 2006 . Reflections on ‘profiting from innovation’ . Research Policy , 35 ( 8 ) : 1131 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong , X. and Frame , J. 1994 . Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data . Research Policy , 23 ( 2 ) : 133 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg , M. 1990 . A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations . The RAND Journal of Economics , 21 ( 1 ) : 172 – 87 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. and van Zeebroeck , N. 2008 . A brief history of space and time: The scope-year index as a patent value indicator based on families and renewals . Scientometrics , 75 ( 2 ) : 319 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck , N. 2007 . Patents only live twice: A patent survival analysis in Europe. CEB Working Paper .
   Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck, N. 2008. Essays on the empirical analysis of patent systems. PhD diss., Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium. http://theses.ulb.ac.be/ETD-db/collection/available/ULBetd-02042008-170122/
   Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck , N. 2011 . The puzzle of patent value indicators . Economics of Innovation and New Technology , 20 ( 1 ) : 33 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck , N. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. 2011 . Filing strategies and patent value . Economics of Innovation and New Technology , doi: 10.1080/10438591003668646
   Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck , N. , van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. and Guellec , D. 2009 . Claiming more: The increased voluminosity of patent applications and its determinants . Research Policy , 38 ( 6 ) : 1006 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck , N. , van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. and Han , W. 2006 . Issues in measuring the degree of technological specialisation with patent data . Scientometrics , 66 ( 3 ) : 481 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck , N. , van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie , B. , Stevnsborg , N. , Guellec , D. and Archontopoulos , E. 2008 . Patent inflation in Europe . World Patent Information , 30 ( 1 ) : 43 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Wagner , S. 2004 . Business method patents in Europe and their strategic use – evidence from franking device manufacturers . LMU Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Webb , C. , Dernis , H. , Harhoff , D. and Hoisl , K. 2005 . Analysing European and international patent citations: A set of EPO patent database building blocks . OECD STI Working Paper 2005/9
   Google Scholar
• Webster , E. , Palangkaraya , A. and Jensen , P. 2007 . Characteristics of international patent application outcomes . Economics Letters , 95 ( 3 ) : 362 – 8 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar