Impact of patenting on firms' performance: an empirical investigation based on manufacturing firms in India

References

• Aggarwal, A. K., and G. Kumar. 1991. “Indian Manufacturing Industry: Verdoorn's Law Revisited.” Indian Economic Journal 39 (2): 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., R. Burgess, S. J. Redding, and F. Zilibotti. 2008. “The Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India.” American Economic Review 98 (4): 1397–1412. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.4.1397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahluwalia, I. J. 1991. Productivity and Growth in Indian Manufacturing. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. S., and M. D. Ahmed. 2013. “Efficiency Variation of Manufacturing Firms: A Case Study of Seafood Processing Firms in Bangladesh.” Review of Economics and Finance 3 (2): 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, B. J., and A. E. Harrison. 1999. “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela.” American Economic Review 89: 605–618. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.3.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrammal, S. K., and R. Sharma. 2014. “R&D and Patenting by Firms in India in High- and Medium-High-Technology Industries.” Journal of Chinese Economics and Business Studies 12 (2): 181–207. doi: 10.1080/14765284.2014.900957
   Google Scholar
• Angelmar, R. 1985. “Market Structure and Research Intensity in High-Technological-Opportunity Industries.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (1): 69–79. doi: 10.2307/2098482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., and M. Pianta. 1996. “Measuring Technological Change through Patent and Innovation Surveys.” Technovation 16 (9): 451–519. doi: 10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. M., and B. S. Javorcik. 2005. “Gifted Kids or Pushy Parents? Foreign Acquisitions and Plant Performance in Indonesia.” Development Studies Working Paper No. 197, Centro Studi Luca D'Agliano, March.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. 2001. “The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation.” Research Policy 30 (4): 611–624. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., W. Bonte, and P. Mahagaonkar. 2012. “Financial Signaling by Innovative Nascent Ventures: The Relevance of Patents and Prototypes.” Research Policy 41: 1407–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, P., and K. Pushpangadan. 1994. “Total Factor Productivity Growth in Manufacturing Industry: A Fresh Look.” Economic and Political Weekly 30: 2028–2035.
   Google Scholar
• Ballot, G., F. Fakhfakh, and E. Taymaz. 2001. “Firms’ Human Capital, R&D and Performance: A Study on French and Swedish Firms.” Labour Economics 8 (4): 443–462. doi: 10.1016/S0927-5371(01)00038-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel, C. A., and R. Garud. 2009. “The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation.” Organization Science 20 (1): 107–117. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basant, R., and B. Fikkert. 1996. “The Effects of R&D, Foreign Technology Purchase, and Domestic and International Spillovers on Productivity in Indian Firms.” The Review of Economic and Statistics 78 (2): 187–199. doi: 10.2307/2109920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., and B. S. Silverman. 2004. “Picking Winners or Building them? Alliance, Intellectual, and Human Capital as Selection Criteria in Venture Financing and Performance of Biotechnology Startups.” Journal of Business Venturing 19: 411–436. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00038-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benavente, J. M. 2006. “The Role of Research and Innovation in Promoting Productivity in Chile.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4–5): 301–315. doi: 10.1080/10438590500512794
   Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J. 1985. “The Validity of Profits-Structure Studies with Particular Reference to the FTC's Line of Business Data.” American Economic Review 75 (1): 37–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S., S. G. Bharadwaj, and B. R. Konsynski. 1999. “Information Technology Effect on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin q.” Management Science 45 (6): 1008–1024. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.7.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., and L. M. Lynch. 1996. “Human Capital Investments and Productivity.” American Economic Review 86 (2): 263–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., and J. Van Reenen. 2002. “Patents, Real Options and Firm Performance.” The Economic Journal 112 (478): C97–C116. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, D., and M. Rogers. 2001. “Market Value, R&D and Intellectual Property: An Empirical analysis of Large Australian Firms.” Economic Record 77 (239): 323–337. doi: 10.1111/1475-4932.t01-1-00026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L., and J.-Rong Chen. 2005. “The Impact of Technology Transfer and R&D on Productivity Growth in Taiwanese Industry: Micro Econometric Analysis Using Plant and Firm-Level Data.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 20 (2): 177–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. A., D. A. Rogers, and B. J. Simkins. 2008. “Hedging and value in the U S Airline industry.” In Corporate Risk Management, edited by D. H. Chew, 299–322. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, X., R. D. McLean, B. Zhang, and W. Zhang. 2013. “ Patents and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Global Patent Awards.” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2371600http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2371600.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnovsky, D., A. Lopez, and G. Pupato. 2006. “Innovation and Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992–2001).” Research Policy 35: 266–288. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. “A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q.” Financial Management 23 (3): 70–74. doi: 10.2307/3665623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2000. “ Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not).” NBER Working Paper 7552. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, R. A., and M. Hirschey. 1984. “R&D, Market Structure and Profits: A Value Based Approach.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 66: 682–686. doi: 10.2307/1935995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse. 1998. “Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 (2): 115–158. doi: 10.1080/10438599800000031
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, G., and P. Zuniga. 2012. “Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries.” World Development 40 (2): 273–290. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danguy, J., G. de Rassenfosse, and van B. Pottelsberghe de la Poterie. 2009. “The R&D–patent Relationship: An Industry Perspective.” EIB Papers 14 (1): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Das, D. K. 2003. “Manufacturing Productivity under Varying Trade Regimes: India in the 1980s and 1990s.” Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relation Working Paper 107.
   Google Scholar
• Deolalikar, A. B., and H. L. Roller. 1989. “Patenting by Manufacturing Firms in India: Its Production and Impact.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 37 (3): 303–314. doi: 10.2307/2098617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dybvig, P. H., and M. Warachka. 2012. “Tobin's q does not Measure Firm Performance: Theory Empiric and Alternative Measures.” SSRN eLibrary. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.Cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. 1996. “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD.” Journal of International Economics 40: 251–278. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(95)01407-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson. 2004. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fethi, M. D., P. M. Jackson, and Jones T. G. Weyman. 2000. “Measuring the Efficiency of European Airlines: An Application of DEA and Tobit analysis.” EPRU Discussion Paper. http://hdl.handle.net/2381/370.
   Google Scholar
• Geroski, P., S. Machin, and J. Van Reener. 1993. “The Profitability of Innovating Firms.” The Rand Journal of Economics 24 (2): 198–211. doi: 10.2307/2555757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S. 2013. “Do Economic Reforms Matter for Manufacturing Productivity? Evidence from Indian Experience.” Economic Modelling 31: 723–733. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhuys, M. 2007. “The Impact of Innovation activities on Productivity and Firm Growth: Evidence from Brazil.” UNIT-MERIT Working Paper 2007-002, United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Goldar, B. 1986a. Productivity Growth in Indian Industry. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goldar, B. 1986b. “Import Substitution, Industrial Concentration and Productivity Growth in Indian Manufacturing.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 48: 143–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48002003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldar, B. 2004. “Indian Manufacturing: Productivity Trends in Pre- and Post-Reform Period.” Economic and Political Weekly 39 (46/47): 5033–5043.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2006. “ Innovation and Productivity across four European Countries.” NBER Working Paper Series 12722. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12722.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, W. E., P. H. Jensen, and E. Webster. 2005. “The Effects on Firm Profits of the Stock of Intellectual Property Rights.” Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper No. 05/05. www.ipria.org/publications/wp/2005/IPRIAWP05.2005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1987. “Patent Statistics an Economic Indicator: A survey.” In R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, edited by Z. Griliches, 287–343. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1990. “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4): 1661–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z., and J. Mairesse. 1984. “Productivity and R&D at the firm level.” In R&D, Patents and Productivity, edited by Z. V. Griliches, 339–374. Cambridge, MA: NBER Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gunday, G., G. Ulusoy, K. Kilic, and L. Alpkan. 2011. “Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance.” International Journal of Production Economics 133: 662–676. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. 1993. “The Stock Market's Valuation of R&D Investment During the 1980's.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 70 (2): 259–264.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. 2011. “ Innovation and Productivity.” NBER Working Paper No. 17178. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17178.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” The Rand Journal of Economics 36 (1): 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., and V. Sena. 2014. “Appropriability Mechanisms, Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from U K.” NBER Working Paper No 20514. http://www.nber.org/papers/w20514.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., G. Thoma, and S. Torrisi. 2007. “The Market Value of Patents and R&D: Evidence from European Firms.” NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 13426. www.nber.org/papers/w13426.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. S., and B. Wernerfelt. 1989. “Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors.” Strategic Management Journal 10 (5): 399–411. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250100502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., F. Narin, F. M. Schererm, and K. Vopel. 1999. “Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3): 511–15. doi: 10.1162/003465399558265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., A. Arundel, and H. Hollanders. 2011. “How Firms Innovate: R&D, Non-R&D and Technology Adoption.” Paper presented at the DIME Final Conference, 6–8 April 2011, Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, R. 1987. “The Validity of ROI as a Measure of Business Performance.” American Economic Review 77 (3): 470–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firm's Patents, Profits and Market Value.” American Economic Review 76 (5): 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., and N. L. Schwarts. 1982. Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. G. 2007. “Estimating Production Functions with R&D Investment and Endogenity.” Hitotsubashi University Discussion Paper Series No. 229. http://hi-stat.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriazidou, E. 1997. “Estimation of a Panel Data Sample Selection Model.” Econometrica 65 (6): 1335–1364. doi: 10.2307/2171739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, L. H. P., and R. H. Litzenberger. 1989. “Dividend Announcements: Cash Flow Signaling vs. Free Cash Flow Hypothesis?.” Journal of Financial Economics 24: 181–191. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(89)90077-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, R. C., W. M. Cohen, and D. C. Mowery. 1985. “R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses.” American Economic Review 15: 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin. 2003. “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservable.” The Review of Economic Studies 70 (2): 317–341. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderberg, E. B., and S. A. Ross. 1981. “Tobin's q ratio and Industrial Organization.” The Journal of Business 54: 1–31. doi: 10.1086/296120
   Google Scholar
• Loof, H., and A. Heshmati. 2006. “On the Relationship between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4–5): 317–344. doi: 10.1080/10438590500512810
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevan, R. 2003. “To Measure or not to Measure Total Factor Productivity Growth.” Oxford Development Studies 31 (3): 365–78. doi: 10.1080/1360081032000111742
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1984. “ R&D and Innovation: Some Empirical Findings.” In R&D, Patents and Productivity, edited by Z. V. Griliches, 127–154. Cambridge, CA: NB ER Books.
   Google Scholar
• Megna, P., and M. Klock. 1993. “The Impact of Intangible Capital on Tobin's q in the Semiconductor Industry.” AEA Proceedings Paper 83: 265–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengistae, T. 1995. “Age-Size Effects and in Productive Efficiency: A Second Test of the Passive Learning Model.” Working Paper, Centre for the study of African economies, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. 2010. “ The contribution of economic history to the study of innovation and technical change: 1750–1914.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rossenberg, Vol. 1; 11–50, Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Narin, F., E. Noam, and R. Perry. 1987. “Patents as Indicators of Corporate Technological Strength.” Research Policy 16: 143–155. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhausler, P., R. Frietsch, T. Schubert, and K. Blind. 2011. “Patents and the Financial Performance of Firms-An Analysis Based on Stock Market Data.” Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 28. www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/…/discussionpaper_28_2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD and Eurostat. 2005. “ Oslo Manual-Third Edition: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.” Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Olley, G. S., and A. Pakes. 1996. “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry.” Econometrica 64 (6): 1263–1298. doi: 10.2307/2171831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, A., and Z. Griliches. 1984. “ Patents and R&D at Firm Level: A First Look.” In R&D Patents and Productivity. NBER. www.nber.org/chapters/c1004.
   Google Scholar
• Raffo, J., S. Lhuillery, and L. Miott1i. 2008. “Northern and Southern Innovativity: A Comparison across European and Latin American Countries.” The European Journal of Development Research 20: 219–239. doi: 10.1080/09578810802060777
   Google Scholar
• Raut, L. K. 1995. “R&D Spillover and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Indian Private Firms.” Journal of Development Economics 48: 1–23. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reserve Bank of India. 2012. Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy. Annual Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sagerstrom, P. S. 1991. “Innovation, Imitation and Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (4): 807–827. doi: 10.1086/261779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandner, P. G., and J. Bolck. 2011. “The Market Value of R&D, Patents, and Trademark.” Research Policy 40: 969–985. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarelli, E., and F. Lotti. 2008. “Innovative Output, Productivity and Profitability: A Test Comparing USPTO and EPO data.” Industry and Innovation 15 (4): 393–409. doi: 10.1080/13662710802273280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1965a. “Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth.” The Journal of Political Economy 73 (3): 290–297. doi: 10.1086/259017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1965b. “Firm Size, Market Structure and Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Invention.” American Economic Review 55 (5): 1097–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1967. “Market Structure and the Employment of Scientist and Engineers.” American Economic Review 57 (3): 524–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H., and M. Klock. 1997. “The Relation between Patent Citations and Tobin's Q in the Semiconductor Industry.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 9: 131–146. doi: 10.1023/A:1008208425044
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, C. 2010. “Does Productivity Differ in Domestic and Foreign Firms? Evidence from Indian Machinery Industry.” Indian Economics Review 45 (1): 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, C. 2011. “ R&D and Productivity in the Indian Pharmaceutical Firms.” MPRA Working Paper. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/31681/.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, S. Y., Y. G. Joo, and H. K. Han. 2007. “Structural Equation Model for the Evaluation of National Funding on R&D Project of SMEs in Consideration with MBNQA Criteria.” Evaluation and Program Planning 30: 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Triest, S., and W. Vis. 2007. “Valuing Patents on Cost-reducing Technology: A Case Study.” International Journal of Production Economics 105 (1): 282–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varis, M., and H. Littunen. 2010. “Types of Innovation, Sources of Information and Performance in Entrepreneurial SMEs.” European Journal of Innovation Management 13 (2): 128–154. doi: 10.1108/14601061011040221
   Google Scholar
• WIPO. 2011. www.wipo.org
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, R. 1994. “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions.” Journal of Management Studies 31: 405–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., A. C. A. Sauaia. 2003. “The Tobin q as a Company Performance Indicator.” Developments in Business simulation and Experimental Learning 30: 155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. A., and T. L. Pett. 2006. “Small firm Performance: Modeling the Role of Product and Process Improvement.” Journal of Small Business Management 44 (2): 268–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar