Local variety and innovation performance in the EU textile and clothing industry

References

• Aarstad, Jarle, Olav A. Kvitastein, and Stig Erik Jakobsen. 2016. “Related and Unrelated Variety as Regional Drivers of Enterprise Productivity and Innovation: A Multilevel Study.” Research Policy 45 (4): 844–856. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, Bjørn T, Ron Boschma, and Philip Cooke. 2011. “Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases.” Regional Studies 45 (7): 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, Bjørn, Markus Grillitsch, and Michaela Trippl. 2017. “Introduction: Combinatorial Knowledge Bases, Regional Innovation, and Development Dynamics.” Economic Geography 93 (5): 429–435. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, David B., and Maryann P. Feldman. 1996. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review 86 (3): 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balassa, Bela. 1965. “Trade Liberalisation and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage.” The Manchester School 33 (2): 99–123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, Catherine, and Stefano Breschi. 2003. “Are Firms in Clusters Really More Innovative?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12 (4): 325–342. doi:10.1080/10438590290020197.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudry, Catherine, and Andrea Schiffauerova. 2009. “Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization Versus Urbanization Debate.” Research Policy 38 (2): 318–337. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, René, Bruno Cassiman, Dries Faems, Bart Leten, and Bart Van Looy. 2014. “Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners.” Research Policy 43 (5): 841–852. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellandi, Marco, Lisa De Propris, and Giacomo Becattini. 2009. A Handbook of Industrial Districts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Belussi, Fiorenza, Alessia Sammarra, and Silvia Rita Sedita. 2010. “Learning at the Boundaries in an ‘Open Regional Innovation System’: A Focus on Firms’ Innovation Strategies in the Emilia Romagna Life Science Industry.” Research Policy 39 (6): 710–721. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierach, Barbara, and Eugene Vorotnikov. 2017. “EU Technical Textiles Growing through Innovation".
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, Ron, Lars Coenen, Koen Frenken, and Bernhard Truffer. 2017. “Towards a Theory of Regional Diversification: Combining Insights From Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies.” Regional Studies 51 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, Ron, and Simona Iammarino. 2009. “Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy.” Economic Geography 85 (3): 289–311. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, Ron, and Ron Martin. 2010. “The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography.” The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, 3–39. doi:10.4337/9781847204912.00007.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, Ron, Asier Minondo, and Mikel Navarro. 2012. “Related Variety and Regional Growth in Spain.” Papers in Regional Science 91 (2): 241–256. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00387.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, John R, and Megan Ronayne. 2014. “Manufacturing Carpets and Technical Textiles: Routines, Resources, Capabilities, Adaptation, Innovation and the Evolution of the British Textile Industry.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 7: 471–488. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, Carolina, Koen Frenken, and Bart Los. 2015. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An Analysis of US State-Level Patenting.” Regional Studies 49 (5): 767–781. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.940305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, Henry William. 2003. Open Innovation : The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Content, Jeroen, and Koen Frenken. 2016. “Related Variety and Economic Development: A Literature Review.” European Planning Studies 24 (12): 2097–2112. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. "High-Level Expert Group on Key Enabling Technologies." Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, Koen, Frank Van Oort, and Thijs Verburg. 2007. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth.” Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, Michael, and Sandra Kublina. 2017. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Growth: The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Entrepreneurship.” Regional Studies, doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1388914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, Edward L., Hedi D. Kallal, José A. Scheinkman, and Andrei Shleifer. 1992. “Growth in Cities.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (6): 1126–1152. doi:10.1086/261856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth.” The Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92–116.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, Markus, Bjørn Asheim, and Michaela Trippl. 2018. “Unrelated Knowledge Combinations: The Unexplored Potential for Regional Industrial Path Development.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 257–274. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsy012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, John, and Ann-Kristin Ridder. 2012. “Open Innovation, Contracts, and Intellectual Property Rights: An Exploratory Empirical Study.” UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 31), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974668.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, Robert. 2007. “The Strength of Weak Lock-Ins: The Renewal of the Westmünsterland Textile Industry.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (5): 1147–1165. doi:10.1068/a3848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersson, Marcus, and Ove Granstrand. 2008. “Patenting Motives, Technology Strategies, and Open Innovation.” Management Decision 55 (6): 1265–1284. doi:10.1108/MD-04-2016-0233.
   Google Scholar
• Horrocks, A. R., and S. C. Anand. 2000. Handbook of Technical Textiles. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, Mokter, K. M. Zahidul Islam, Mohammad Abu Sayeed, and Ilkka Kauranen. 2016. “A Comprehensive Review of Open Innovation Literature.”.” Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 7 (1): 2–25. doi:10.1108/JSTPM-02-2015-0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Patent Classification. 1999. Guide, Survey of Classes and Summary of Main Groups. 7th edn, Vol. 9. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., B. Johnson, E. Lorenz, and B. A. Lundvall. 2007. “Forms of Knowledge and Modes of Innovation.” Research Policy 36 (5): 680–693. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapelko, Magdalena, and Alfons Oude. 2015. “An International Comparison of Productivity Change in the Textile and Clothing Industry: A Bootstrapped Malmquist Index Approach.” Empirical Economics 48: 1499–1523. doi:10.1007/s00181-014-0835-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, Dieter F. 2015. “Editorial: Evolutionary Economic Geography – Theoretical and Empirical Progress.” Regional Studies 49 (5): 705–711. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1033178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, Keld, Maria Isabella Leone, and Salvatore Torrisi. 2010. “Technological Exploration Through Licensing: New Insights From the Licensee’s Point of View.” Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (3): 871–897. doi:10.1093/icc/dtq034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, James H., Stephen Roper, and John R. Bryson. 2011. “Openness, Knowledge, Innovation and Growth in UK Business Services.” Research Policy 40 (10): 1438–1452. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, Alfred. 1890. “Principles of Economics.” Learning 2), doi:10.1038/042362a0.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, Manik. 2017. “Technical Textiles Are Driving Industry Growth.” Apparel Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Miguelez, Ernest, and Rosina Moreno. 2017. “Relatedness, External Linkages and Regional Innovation in Europe.” Regional Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, Rosina, Raffaele Paci, and Stefano Usai. 2005. “Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions.” Environment and Planning A 37 (10): 1793–1812. doi:10.1068/a37341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, Rosina, Raffaele Paci, and Stefano Usai. 2006. “Innovation Clusters in the European Regions.” European Planning Studies 14 (9): 1235–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. OECD Patent Statistics Manual. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Paci, Raffaele, and Stefano Usai. 1999. “Externalities, Knowledge Spillovers and the Spatial Distribution of Innovation.” GeoJournal 49 (4): 381–390. doi:10.1023/A:1007192313098.
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, Keith. 1984. “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory.” Research Policy 13: 343–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli, Sam, and Nunzia Carbonara. 2014. “The Role of Knowledge Variety and Intensity for Regional Innovation.” Small Business Economics 43 (2): 493–509. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9547-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Un,  C. Annique, and Kazuhiro Asakawa. 2015. “Types of R&D Collaborations and Process Innovation: The Benefit of Collaborating Upstream in the Knowledge Chain.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (1): 138–153. doi:10.1111/jpim.12229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar