Embracing invention similarity for the measurement of vertically overlapping claims

References

• Acemoglu, Daron, and Amy Finkelstein. 2008. “Input and Technology Choices in Regulated Industries: Evidence from the Health Care Sector.” Journal of Political Economy 116 (5): 837–880. doi: 10.1086/595014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, Sam, Bruno Cassiman, and Juan Carlos Gomez. 2018. “Text Matching to Measure Patent Similarity.” Strategic Management Journal 39 (1): 62–84. doi: 10.1002/smj.2699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Iain M., Megan J. MacGarvie, and Elisabeth Mueller. 2010. “Patent Thickets, Licensing and Innovative Performance.” Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (3): 899–925. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Wesley M., Richard R. Nelson, and John P Walsh. 2000. “Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not).” National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, Edward J., and David J Teece. 2015. “Untangling the Patent Thicket Literature.”.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Timo, and Philipp Ringler. 2014. “The Coincidence of Patent Thickets – A Comparative Analysis.” Technovation 38: 42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frakes, Michael D., and Melissa F Wasserman. 2017. “Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents? Evidence from Microlevel Application Data.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 99 (3): 550–563. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaessler, Fabian, Dietmar Harhoff, and Stefan Sorg. 2017. “Patents and Cumulative Innovation – Evidence from Post-Grant Patent Oppositions.” Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 12800). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Galasso, Alberto, and Mark Schankerman. 2010. “Patent Thickets, Courts, and the Market for Innovation.” The RAND Journal of Economics 41 (3): 472–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Stuart J. H., Alan C. Marco, and Richard Miller. 2018. “The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A Window on Patent Processing.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 27 (3): 554–578. doi: 10.1111/jems.12263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Jerry R., and Suzanne Scotchmer. 1995. “On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation.” The RAND Journal of Economics 26: 20–33. doi: 10.2307/2556033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn, Christian Helmers, C Rosazza-Bondibene, and Georg Von Graevenitz. 2013. “A Study of Patent Thickets.” UKIPO.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Jeffrey M., Kenneth A. Younge, and Alan C Marco. 2018. “Patent Citations Reexamined.” SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Zhen, and Brian D Wright. 2017. “Why Weak Patents? Testing the Examiner Ignorance Hypothesis.” Journal of Public Economics 148: 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Qiang, Amanda Myers, and Scott Beliveau. 2017. “USPTO Patent Prosecution Research Data: Unlocking Office Action Traits.” SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Marco, Alan C., Michael Carley, Steven Jackson, and Amanda Myers. 2015. “The USPTO Historical Patent Data Files Two Centuries of Innovation.” SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Marco, Alan C., Josh Sarnoff, and Charles deGrazia. 2017. “Patent Claims and Patent Scope.” SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Marco, Alan C., Andrew Toole, Richard Miller, and Jesse Frumkin. 2017. “USPTO Patent Prosecution and Examiner Performance Appraisal.” SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, William. 1969. Invention, Growth, and Welfare. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'donoghue, Ted, Suzanne Scotchmer, and Jacques-François Thisse. 1998. “Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Progress.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7 (1): 1–32. doi: 10.1162/105864098567317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pairolero, Nicholas. 2016. “Pricing in Complex Networks.” ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Salton, Gerard, and Michael Mcgill. 1986. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Scotchmer, Susan. 2004. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Carl. 2000. “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting.” Innovation Policy and the Economy 1: 119–150. doi: 10.1086/ipe.1.25056143
   Google Scholar
• Spulber, Daniel F. 2017. “Complementary Monopolies and Bargaining.” The Journal of Law and Economics 60 (1): 29–74. doi: 10.1086/692586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Graevenitz, Georg, Stefan Wagner, and Dietmar Harhoff. 2011. “How to Measure Patent Thickets – A Novel Approach.” Economics Letters 111 (1): 6–9. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younge, Kenneth, and Jeffrey Kuhn. 2016. “Patent-to-patent Similarity: a Vector Space Model.” SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Ziedonis, Rosemarie Ham. 2004. “Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms.” Management Science 50 (6): 804–820. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar