Two-way relationship between innovation and market structure: evidence from Indian high and medium technology firms

References

• Acemoglu, Daron, Philippe Aghion, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2006. “Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth.” Journal of the European Economic Association 4 (1): 37–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, Philippe, Nick Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, and Peter Howitt. 2005. “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2): 701–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, Mercedes Gumbau. 1995. “Simultaneity between Strategic Variables: Production, Innovation, and Product Differentiation.” International Advances in Economic Research 1 (4): 391–401.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrammal, Sunil Kumar, and Ruchi Sharma. 2014. “R&D and Patenting by Firms in India in High-and Medium-High-Technology Industries.” Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 12 (2): 181–207.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, 609–626. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, William L. 1969. “The Feedback Effect of Business Conduct on Industry Structure.” The Journal of Law and Economics 12 (1): 123–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, Badi. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bas, Maria, and Caroline Paunov. 2018. “The Unequal Effect of India's Industrial Liberalization on Firms’ Decision to Innovate: Do Business Conditions Matter?” The Journal of Industrial Economics 66 (1): 205–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basant, Rakesh, and Pulak Mishra. 2014. “Determinants of Inter-Industry Variations in Research and Development Efforts in Indian Manufacturing Sector: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis.” Innovation and Development 4 (1): 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Beneito, Pilar, María Engracia Rochina-Barrachina, and Amparo Sanchis. 2017. “Competition and Innovation with Selective Exit: An Inverted-U Shape Relationship?” Oxford Economic Papers 69 (4): 1032–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berchicci, Luca. 2013. “Towards an Open R&D System: Internal R&D Investment, External Knowledge Acquisition and Innovative Performance.” Research Policy 42 (1): 117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, Richard, Rachel Griffiths, and John Van Reenen. 1999. “Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms.” Review of Economic Studies 66 (3): 529–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldrin, Michele, Juan Correa Allamand, David K. Levine, and Carmine Ornaghi. 2011. “Competition and Innovation.” Cato Papers on Public Policy 1: 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, Helson, and Larry Willmore. 1991. “Technological Imports and Technological Effort: An Analysis of Their Determinants in Brazilian Firms.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 39 (4): 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, Stefano, Franco Malerba, and Luigi Orsenigo. 2000. “Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation.” The Economic Journal 110 (463): 388–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadha, Alka. 2009. “TRIPs and Patenting Activity: Evidence From the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry.” Economic Modelling 26 (2): 499–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandy, Rajesh K., and Gerard J. Tellis. 1998. “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize.” Journal of Marketing Research 35 (4): 474–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerides, Sofronis, Manthos D. Delis, and Sotirios Kokas. 2015. “A new Data set on Competition in National Banking Markets.” Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 24 (2-3): 267–311.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D.” The Economic Journal 99 (397): 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson, Simon C., and Rajneesh Narula. 2014. “Asset Recombination in International Partnerships as a Source of Improved Innovation Capabilities in China.” Multinational Business Review 22 (4): 394–417.
   Google Scholar
• Comanor, William S. 1967. “Market Structure, Product Differentiation, and Industrial Research.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 81 (4): 639–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comanor, William S., and Thomas A. Wilson. 1967. “Advertising, Market Structure and Performance.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 49 (4): 423–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, Juan A. 2012. “Innovation and Competition: An Unstable Relationship.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 27 (1): 160–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, Juan A., and Carmine Ornaghi. 2014. “Competition & Innovation: Evidence from US Patent and Productivity Data.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 62 (2): 258–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, Partha, and Joseph Stiglitz. 1980. “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity.” The Economic Journal 90 (358): 266–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Stephen W., and Paul A. Geroski. 1997. “Changes in Concentration, Turbulence, and the Dynamics of Market Shares.” Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (3): 383–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, Harold. 1973. “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy.” The Journal of Law and Economics 16 (1): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanora, Madan, Ruchi Sharma, and Qayoom Khachoo. 2018. “Non-linear Impact of Product and Process Innovations on Market Power: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation.” Economic Modelling 70: 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson, Robert E., and K. J. Joseph. 1999. “Foreign Technology Licensing in Indian Industry: An Econometric Analysis of the Choice of Partners, Terms of Contract and the Effect on Licensees’ Performance.” Economic and Political Weekly 34 (27): 1801–1809.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, Saibal. 2009. “R&D in Indian Manufacturing Enterprises: What Shapes It?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18 (4): 337–352.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, Harald. 2000. “The Evolution of Market Structure in Semiconductors: The Role of Product Standards.” Research Policy 29 (6): 725–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, Vinod K. 1983. “A Simultaneous Determination of Structure, Conduct and Performance in Canadian Manufacturing.” Oxford Economic Papers 35 (2): 281–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, John, and Ning Wang. 2012. “Is There Complementarity or Substitutability between Internal and External R&D Strategies?” Research Policy 41 (6): 1072–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., Zvi Griliches, and Jerry A. Hausman. 1986. “Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag?” International Economic Review 27 (2): 265–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, Stuart L., and Gautam Ahuja. 1996. “Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance.” Business Strategy and the Environment 5 (1): 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hashmi, Aamir Rafique. 2013. “Competition and Innovation: The Inverted-U Relationship Revisited.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (5): 1653–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inui, Tomohiko, Atsushi Kawakami, and Tsutomu Miyagawa. 2012. “Market Competition, Differences in Technology, and Productivity Improvement: An Empirical Analysis Based on Japanese Manufacturing Firm Data.” Japan and the World Economy 24 (3): 197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagadeesh, Harishankar, and Subash Sasidharan. 2014. “Do Stronger IPR Regimes Influence R&D Efforts? Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry.” Global Business Review 15 (2): 189–204.
   Google Scholar
• Kambhampati, Uma S., and Ashok Parikh. 2003. “Disciplining Firms: The Impact of Trade Reforms on Profit Margins in Indian Industry.” Applied Economics 35 (4): 461–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanwar, Sunil, and Robert Evenson. 2003. “Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change?” Oxford Economic Papers 55 (2): 235–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanwar, Sunil, and Shailu Singh. 2018. “The Innovation-R&D Nexus in an Emerging Economy: Evidence from the Indian Manufacturing Sector.” Australian Economic Papers 57 (1): 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathuria, Vinish. 2008. “The Impact of FDI Inflows on R&D Investment by Medium-and High-Tech Firms in India in the Post-Reform Period.” Transnational Corporations 17 (2): 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Katrak, Homi. 1990. “Imports of Technology and the Technological Effort of Indian Enterprises.” World Development 18 (3): 371–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khachoo, Qayoom, and Ruchi Sharma. 2017. “FDI and Incumbent R&D Behavior: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Sector.” Journal of Economic Studies 44 (3): 380–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeller, C. Timothy. 1995. “Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size: A Simultaneous Equations Model.” Managerial and Decision Economics 16 (3): 259–269.
   Google Scholar
• Koeller, C. Timothy. 2005. “Technological Opportunity and the Relationship between Innovation Output and Market Structure.” Managerial and Decision Economics 26 (3): 209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Koetter, Michael, James W. Kolari, and Laura Spierdijk. 2012. “Enjoying the Quiet Life under Deregulation? Evidence from Adjusted Lerner Indices for U.S. Banks.” Review of Economics and Statistics 94 (2): 462–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Nagesh, and Aradhna Aggarwal. 2005. “Liberalization, Outward Orientation and in-House R&D Activity of Multinational and Local Firms: A Quantitative Exploration for Indian Manufacturing.” Research Policy 34 (4): 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Nagesh, and Mohammed Saqib. 1996. “Firm Size, Opportunities for Adaptation and in-House R & D Activity in Developing Countries: The Case of Indian Manufacturing.” Research Policy 25 (5): 713–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Richard C., Wesley M. Cohen, and David C. Mowery. 1985. “R & D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses.” The American Economic Review 75 (2): 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Richard, and Peter C. Reiss. 1984. “Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure.” In R&D, Patents, and Productivity, edited by Zvi Griliches, 175–208. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinsohn, James, and Amil Petrin. 2003. “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables.” Review of Economic Studies 70 (2): 317–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, Jo Thori, and Halvor Mehlum. 2010. “With or without U? The Appropriate Test for a U-Shaped Relationship.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 72 (1): 109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokshin, Boris, René Belderbos, and Martin Carree. 2008. “The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70 (3): 399–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, John. 1986. “An Empirical Analysis of Process and Product Patenting: A Simultaneous Equation Framework.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (3): 319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, John. 1989. “R&D, Concentration and Advertising: A Simultaneous Equations Model.” Managerial and Decision Economics 10 (2): 101–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, Franco, and Luigi Orsenigo. 1996. “Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation are Technology-Specific.” Research Policy 25 (3): 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, Franco, and Luigi Orsenigo. 1997. “Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (1): 83–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, Edwin. 1981. “Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (4): 610–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. Chet, and Laura B. Cardinal. 1994. “Strategic Planning and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of More Than Two Decades of Research.” Academy of Management Journal 37 (6): 1649–1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, Vinod. 2007. “The Determinants of R&D Expenditure of Firms: Evidence From a Cross-Section of Indian Firms.” Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy 26 (3): 237–248.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Dennis C., and John E. Tilton. 1969. “Research and Development Costs as a Barrier to Entry.” The Canadian Journal of Economics 2 (4): 570–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghavi, Alireza, and Chiara Strozzi. 2015. “Intellectual Property Rights, Diasporas, and Domestic Innovation.” Journal of International Economics 96 (1): 150–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan, Kocheril. 1998. “Technology Acquisition, De-Regulation and Competitiveness: A Study of Indian Automobile Industry.” Research Policy 27 (2): 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negassi, Syoum, Stephane Lhuillery, Jean-François Sattin, Tsu-Yi Hung, and Florent Pratlong. 2018. “Does the Relationship Between Innovation and Competition Vary Across Industries? Comparison of Public and Private Research Enterprises.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1–18. doi:10.1080/10438599.2018.1527552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemlioglu, Ilayda, and Sushanta K. Mallick. 2017. “Do Managerial Practices Matter in Innovation and Firm Performance Relations? New Evidence from the UK.” European Financial Management 23 (5): 1016–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickell, Stephen J. 1996. “Competition and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Political Economy 104 (4): 724–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, Ariel, and Zvi Griliches. 1980. “Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Report.” Economics Letters 5 (4): 377–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, Keith. 1984. “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory.” Research Policy 13 (6): 343–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Almarin. 1966. “Patents, Potential Competition, and Technical Progress.” The American Economic Review 56 (1/2): 301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisano, Gary P. 1990. “The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polder, Michael, and Erik Veldhuizen. 2012. “Innovation and Competition in the Netherlands: Testing the Inverted-U for Industries and Firms.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 12 (1): 67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Resende, Marcelo. 2007. “Structure, Conduct and Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Investigation for the Brazilian Manufacturing Industry.” Applied Economics 39 (7): 937–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraswathy, Beena. 2018. “Innovation–Consolidation Nexus: Evidence from India’s Manufacturing Sector.” In Globalisation of Technology, edited by N. S. Siddharthan, and K. Narayanan, 183–201. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sasidharan, Subash, and Vinish Kathuria. 2011. “Foreign Direct Investment and R&D: Substitutes or Complements—A Case of Indian Manufacturing After 1991 Reforms.” World Development 39 (7): 1226–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, François M. 1965. “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions.” The American Economic Review 55 (5): 1097–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, François M. 1979. “The Welfare Economics of Product Variety: An Application to the Ready-to- Eat Cereals Industry.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 28 (2): 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, Frederic M., and David Ross. 1990. Industrial Market Structure and Market Performance. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, John. 1984. “Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity.” In R&D, Patents, and Productivity, edited by Zvi Griliches, 233–248. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Setterstrom, Andrew, Peter Mykytyn, Kathleen Mykytyn, and Kai Reimers. 2013. “Strategic Purpose of Software Patents: An Exploratory Study of German Organizations.” Journal of Global Information Technology Management 16 (2): 6–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, Weijan, Gordon Walker, and Bruce Kogut. 1994. “Interfirm Cooperation and Startup Innovation in the Biotechnology Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 15 (5): 387–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Ruchi, Audhesh K. Paswan, Sunil K. Ambrammal, and Madan Dhanora. 2018. “Impact of Patent Policy Changes on R&D Expenditure by Industries in India.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 21 (1-2): 52–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, William G. 1990. “Mainstream Industrial Organization and ‘New’ Schools.” Economic Review 41 (3): 453–480.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, Richa. 2018. “Impact of R&D Spillovers on Firm-Level R&D Intensity: Panel Data Evidence from Electronics Goods Sector in India.” In Globalisation of Technology, edited by N. S. Siddharthan, and K. Narayanan, 203–225. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Siddharthan, N. S. 1988. “Technology, Modernisation and Growth: A Study of Indian Corporate Sector, 1975-83.” Economic and Political Weekly 23 (31): 1587–1590.
   Google Scholar
• Sridhar, Shrihari, Sriram Narayanan, and Raji Srinivasan. 2014. “Dynamic Relationships among R&D, Advertising, Inventory and Firm Performance.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 42 (3): 277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subodh, Kandamuthan. 2002. “Market Concentration, Firm Size and Innovative Activity: A Firm-Level Economic Analysis of Selected Indian Industries under Economic Liberalization (No. 2002/108)”, WIDER Discussion Papers (UNU-WIDER).
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill, Stewart. 2006. “Knowledge, Innovation and Firm Performance in High-and Low-Technology Regimes.” Journal of Business Venturing 21 (5): 687–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson, and Andreas Poldahl. 2006. “Is There Really an Inverted U-Shaped Relation between Competition and R&D?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (2): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Topalova, Petia, and Amit Khandelwal. 2011. “Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (3): 995–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, John. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. London: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, James, and Fernando Suarez. 1993. “Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure.” Research Policy 22 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossen, Robert W. 1999. “Market Power, Industrial Concentration and Innovative Activity.” Review of Industrial Organization 15 (4): 367–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdanfar, Darush. 2013. “Profitability Determinants among Micro Firms: Evidence from Swedish Data.” International Journal of Managerial Finance 9 (2): 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, Seok. 2004. “A Note on the Market Structure and Performance in Korean Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Policy Modeling 26 (6): 733–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar