The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms

References

• Abadie, A., and G. W. Imbens. 2016. “Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score.” Econometrica 84 (2): 781–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts, K., and T. Schmidt. 2008. “Two for the Price of one?: Additionality Effects of R&D Subsidies: A Comparison Between Flanders and Germany.” Research Policy 37 (5): 806–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albano, G. L., and M. Sparro. 2010. “Flexible Strategies for Centralized Public Procurement.” Review of Economics and Institutions 1 (2). Article 4.
   Google Scholar
• Almus, M., and D. Czarnitzki. 2003. “The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms’ Innovation Activities: The Case of Eastern Germany.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 21 (2): 226–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann, M., and M. Essig. 2015. “Public Procurement of Innovation: Empirical Evidence From EU Public Authorities on Barriers for the Promotion of Innovation.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 28 (3): 282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, B. 2001. Technological Change and the Evolution of Corporate Innovation: The Structure of Patenting, 1890–1990. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., and F. Crespi. 2013. “The ‘Matthew Effect’ in R&D Public Subsidies: The Italian Evidence.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (8): 1523–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., and A. Gehringer. 2015. “Knowledge Externalities and Demand Pull: The European Evidence.” Economic Systems 39 (4): 608–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelt, S., and F. Galindo-Rueda. 2016. “Measuring the Link between Public Procurement and Innovation.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2016/03. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aristei, D., A. Sterlacchini, and F. Venturini. 2015. “The Effects of Public Supports on Business R&D: Firm-level Evidence across EU Countries.” MPRA Paper No. 64611. Germany: University Library of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. M., and K. Hussinger. 2005. “Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-Level Analysis.” Review of World Economics 141 (2): 219–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, B., and W. Sofka. 2009. “Innovation on Demand—Can Public Procurement Drive Market Success of Innovations?” Research Policy 38 (8): 1235–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., and A. Ichino. 2002. “Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores.” The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata 2 (4): 358–377.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S., and C. Meghir. 1994. “Financial Constraints and Company Investment.” Fiscal Studies 15 (2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and C. Edquist. 2013. “The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (8): 1513–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., and H. Walker. 2011. “Sustainable Procurement in the Public Sector: An International Comparative Study.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31 (4): 452–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronzini, R., and E. Iachini. 2014. “Are Incentives for R&D Effective? Evidence From a Regression Discontinuity Approach.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6 (4): 100–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busom, I., B. Corchuelo, and E. Martínez-Ros. 2014. “Tax Incentives … or Subsidies for Business R&D?” Small Business Economics 43 (3): 571–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., and S. Kopeinig. 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1): 31–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., and S. Kösters. 2012. “Picking the Winner? Empirical Evidence on the Targeting of R&D Subsidies to Start-ups.” Small Business Economics 39 (4): 921–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravella, S., and F. Crespi. 2018. On the Prevalence of Tax Tools in Italian Industrial Policy. In A. Scialà (a cura di), Italian Fiscal Policy Review. Università degli studi Roma Tre.
   Google Scholar
• Caravella, S., F. Crespi, D. Guarascio, and M. Tubiana. 2020. “Competitive Strategies, Heterogeneous Demand Sources and Firms’ Growth Trajectories (No. 442).” GLO Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Carboni, O. A. 2011. “R&D Subsidies and Private R&D Expenditures: Evidence From Italian Manufacturing Data.” International Review of Applied Economics 25 (4): 419–439.
   Google Scholar
• Cepilovs, A. 2013. “Public Procurement for Innovation in Small States. The Case of Latvia.” Rivista di Politica Economica 2: 99–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cerulli, G. 2010. “Modelling and Measuring the Effect of Public Subsidies on Business R&D: A Critical Review of the Econometric Literature.” Economic Record 86 (274): 421–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulli, G. 2015. Econometric Evaluation of Socio-economic Programs. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics Series, 49.
   Google Scholar
• Cerulli, G., and B. Potì. 2012. “Designing ex-Post Assessment of Corporate RDI Policies: Conceptualisation, Indicators and Modelling.” World Review of Science, Technology and Sust. Development 9: 96–123.
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, F., and D. Guarascio. 2019. “The Demand-Pull Effect of Public Procurement on Innovation and Industrial Renewal.” Industrial and Corporate Change 28 (4): 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., P. Hünermund, and N. Moshgbar. 2018. “Public Procurement as Policy Instrument for Innovation.” ZEW – Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 18-001.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., and G. Licht. 2006. “Additionality of Public R&D Grants in a Transition Economy.” The Economics of Transition 14 (1): 101–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., and A. A. Toole. 2007. “Business R&D and the Interplay of R&D Subsidies and Product Market Uncertainty.” Review of Industrial Organization 31 (3): 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A., B. H. Hall, and A. A. Toole. 2000. “Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence.” Research Policy 29 (4/5): 497–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., S. Iammarino, M. Savona, and N. von Tunzelmann. 2012. “What Hampers Innovation? Revealed Barriers Versus Deterring Barriers.” Research Policy 41 (2): 482–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stefano, G., A. Gambardella, and G. Verona. 2012. “Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions.” Research Policy 41 (8): 1283–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divella, M., and A. Sterlacchini. 2018. “Innovation Induced by Public Procurement: A Firm-level Analysis for Italy and Norway.” MPRA Paper 89592. Germany: University Library of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Draca, M. 2013. “Reagan’s Innovation Dividend? Technological Impacts of the 1980s US Defense Build-up.” Working Paper. Coventry, UK: Department of Economics, University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2009. Exploring Public Procurement as a Strategic Innovation Policy Mix Instrument. Final Report of the EU Funded OMC-PTP Project.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2016. Stock-taking of Administrative Capacity, Systems and Practices across the EU to Ensure the Compliance and Quality of Public Procurement Involving European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds, Catalogue number: KN-01-16-350-EN-N.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2018. Measuring Public Administration: A Feasibility Study for Better Comparative Indicators in the EU.” Catalogue number: KE-02-18-989-EN-N.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and L. Georghiou. 2007. “Public Procurement and Innovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side.” Research Policy 36 (7): 949–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., M. Rolfstam, L. Tsipouri, and E. Uyarra. 2015. “Risk Management in Public Procurement of Innovation: a Conceptualization.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala- Iturriagagoiti, and J. Edler, 87–109. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Organizations and Institutions. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2014. “Striving Towards a Holistic Innovation Policy in European Countries-but Linearity Still Prevails!.” STI Policy Review 5 (2): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2015. Innovation-related Public Procurement as a Demand-oriented Innovation Policy Instrument, Circle papers in innovation studies, Lund University, n. 2015/28.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and L. Hommen. 2000. “Public Technology Procurement and Innovation Theory.” In Public Technology Procurement and Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, L. Hommen, and L. Tsipouri, 5–70. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fazzari, S., R. G. Hubbard, and B. Petersen. 1988. “Investment, Financing Decisions, and tax Policy.” American Economic Review 78 (2): 200–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippetti, A., and D. Archibugi. 2011. “Innovation in Times of Crisis: National Systems of Innovation, Structure, and Demand.” Research Policy 40 (2): 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra, and M. Laranja. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘Policy Mix’ for Innovation.” Research Policy 40 (5): 702–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florio, M., F. Giffoni, A. Giunta, and E. Sirtori. 2018. “Big Science, Learning, and Innovation: Evidence From CERN Procurement.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 915–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup Organisation. 2011. Innobarometer 2010: Analytical Report – Innovation in Public Administrations, Flash Eurobarometer 305.
   Google Scholar
• García-Quevedo, J., G. Pellegrino, and M. Savona. 2016. “Reviving Demand-Pull Perspectives: The Effect of Demand Uncertainty and Stagnancy on R&D Strategy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (4): 1087–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., J. Edler, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Policy Instruments for Public Procurement of Innovation: Choice, Design and Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisetti, C. 2017. “Demand-pull and Environmental Innovations: Estimating the Effects of Innovative Public Procurement.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 125: 178–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, X., J. Jaumandreu, and C. Pazó. 2005. “Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness.” RAND Journal of Economics 36 (4): 930–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, X., and C. Pazó. 2008. “Do Public Subsidies Stimulate Private R&D Spending?” Research Policy 37 (3): 371–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerzoni, M., and E. Raiteri. 2015. “Demand-side vs. Supply-Side Technology Policies: Hidden Treatment and new Empirical Evidence on the Policy mix.” Research Policy 44 (3): 726–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. 2002. “The Financing of Research and Development.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18 (1): 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2000. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. NBER Working Paper, (w7741).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., and J Lerner. 2010. “The Financing of R&D and Innovation.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Vol. 1., edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, 609–639. Amsterdam, North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., P. Moncada-Paterno-Castello, S. Montresor, and A. Vezzani. 2016. “Financing Constraints, R&D Investments and Innovative Performances: New Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level for Europe.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 25 (3): 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd. 1998. “Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator.” Review of Economic Studies 65 (2): 261–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., and S. Navarro-Lozano. 2004. “Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models.” Stastistic 86 (February): 30–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hoshi, T., A. Kashyap, and D. Scharfstein. 1991. “Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence From Japanese Industrial Groups.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1): 33–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huergo, E., and L. Moreno. 2017. “Subsidies or Loans? Evaluating the Impact of R&D Support Programmes.” Research Policy 46 (7): 1198–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussinger, K. 2008. “R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semiparametric two-Step Selection Model.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 729–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, A., and O. Toivanen. 2005. “Do Financial Constraints Hold Back Innovation and Growth?: Evidence on the Role of Public Policy.” Research Policy 34 (9): 1385–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., F. Sanna-Randaccio, and M. Savona. 2009. “The Perception of Obstacles to Innovation. Foreign Multinationals and Domestic Firms in Italy.” Revue D'Economie Industrielle 125: 75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Izsak, K., and J. Edler. 2011. Trends and challenges in demand-side innovation policies in Europe. Thematic report, 2011–2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., and V. Lember. 2010. “Public Procurement as an Industrial Policy Tool: an Option for Developing Countries?” Journal of Public Procurement 10 (3): 368–404.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, F. 2002. “Subcontracting and the Performance of Small and Medium Firms in Japan.” Small Business Economics 18 (1-3): 163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., and B. Verspagen. 1990. “Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-examined.” Research Policy 19 (4): 387–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lach, S. 2002. “Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence From Israel.” Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (4): 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V., R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet. 2014. “Public Procurement and Innovation: Theory and Practice.” In Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy, edited by V. Lember, R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet, 13–34. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V., R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet. 2015. “Quo Vadis Public Procurement of Innovation?” Innovation: European Journal of Social Science Research 28 (3): 403–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., L. Georghiou, and J. Rigby. 2015. “Public Procurement for Innovation Elements in the Chinese New Energy Vehicles Program.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler, 179–208. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, F. R. 1988. “The Private R and D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competitions.” The American Economic Review 78 (3): 550–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchese, M., L. Nascia, and M. Pianta. 2016. “Industrial Policy and Technology in Italy.” Economia e Politica Industriale 43 (3): 233–260.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. 2016. “R&D Policy Instruments–a Critical Review of What We Do and Don’t Know.” Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2015. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Vs. Private Sector Myths. Vol. 1. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., and R. Kattel. 2018. “Mission-orientated Innovation Policy and Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 787–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S. 2001. “Evolutionary Approaches to Population Thinking and the Problem of Growth and Development.” In Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, edited by K. Dopfer, 141–164. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mourão, V., and R. Cantu. 2014. “Brazil.” In Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy: International Perspectives, edited by V. Lember, R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet, 65–92. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D., and N. Rosenberg. 1993. “The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies.” Research Policy 22 (2): 107–108.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S., and D. G. Marquis. 1969. Successful Industrial Innovations: A Study of Factoring Undelying Innovation in Selected Firms. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nascia, L., and G. La Placa. 2016. RIO Country Report 2015: Italy. JRC. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Nyiri, L., D. Osimo, R. Özcivelek, C. Centeno, and M. Cabrera. 2007. Public Procurement for the Promotion of R&D and Innovation in ICT. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, G., and M. Savona. 2013. Financing versus Knowledge and Demand Constraints to Innovation (UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 29-2013).
   Google Scholar
• Piva, M., and M. Vivarelli. 2007. “Is Demand-Pulled Innovation Equally Important in Different Groups of Firms?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (5): 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiteri, E. 2018. “A Time to Nourish? Evaluating the Impact of Public Procurement on Technological Generality Through Patent Data.” Research Policy 47 (5): 936–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M. 2009. “Public Procurement as an Innovation Policy Tool: The Role of Institutions.” Science and Public Policy 36 (5): 349–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M. 2012. “An Institutional Approach to Research on Public Procurement of Innovation.” Innovation: European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (3): 303–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M., and O. H. Petersen. 2014. “Denmark.” In Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy: International Perspectives, edited by V. Lember, R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet, 109–126. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roolaht, T. 2010. “The Demand-Side Innovation Policies in the Context of Small EU Member Country.” Discussions on Estonian Economic Policy 18: 404–427.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. 1978. “Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization.” The Annals of Statistics 6: 34–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Carreira, M. D. C., M. C. Peñate-Valentín, and P. Varela-Vázquez. 2019. “Public Procurement of Innovation and Regional Development in Peripheral Areas.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savignac, F. 2008. “Impact of Financial Constraints on Innovation: What can be Learned From a Direct Measure?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17 (6): 553–569.
   Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P., and A. Pyka. 2004. “Economic Development by the Creation of New Sectors.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 (1): 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scellato, G. 2006. “Patents, Firm Size and Financial Constraints: an Empirical Analysis for a Panel of Italian Manufacturing Firms.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (1): 55–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmookler, J. 1962. “Economic Sources of Inventive Activity.” The Journal of Economic History 22 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sianesi, B. 2004. “An Evaluation of the Active Labour Market Programmes in Sweden.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 133–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavtchev, V., and S. Wiederhold. 2011. The Impact of Government Procurement Composition on Private R&D Activities (No. 2011, 036). Jena economic research papers.
   Google Scholar
• Slavtchev, V., and S. Wiederhold. 2016. “Does the Technological Content of Government Demand Matter for Private R&D? Evidence from US States.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 8 (2): 45–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojčić, N., S. Srhoj, and A. Coad. 2019. “Innovation Procurement as Capability-Building: Evaluating Innovation Policies in Eight Central & Eastern European Countries.” European Economic Review 121: 103330. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takalo, T., and T. Tanayama. 2010. “Adverse Selection and Financing of Innovation: Is There a Need for R&D Subsidies?” The Journal of Technology Transfer 35 (1): 16–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takalo, T., T. Tanayama, and O. Toivanen. 2013. “Estimating the Benefits of Targeted R&D Subsidies. Review of Economics and Statistics.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (1): 255–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijs, N., G. Hammerschmid, and E. Palaric. 2018. A Comparative Overview of Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. 2013. Review of Measures in Support of Public Procurement of Innovation. Report within the MIoIR-NESTA Compendium of Evidence on Innovation Policy. London/Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. Edler, J. Garcia-Estevez, L. Georghiou, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Barriers to Innovation Through Public Procurement: A Supplier Perspective.” Technovation 34 (10): 631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., and K. Flanagan. 2010. “From Regional Systems of Innovation to Regions as Innovation Policy Spaces.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 (4): 681–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, K. Flanagan, and E. Magro. 2020. “Public Procurement, Innovation and Industrial Policy: Rationales, Roles, Capabilities and Implementation.” Research Policy 49 (1): 103844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar