Precocious inventors: early patenting success and lifetime inventive performance

References

• Akcigit, U., S. Caicedo, E. Miguelez, S. Stantcheva, and V. Sterzi. 2018. “Dancing With the Stars: Innovation Through Interactions.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 24466, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M., D. Avery, F. Narin, and P. McAllister. 1991. “Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents.” Research Policy 20 (3): 251–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T., and R. Katz. 1992. “Age, Education and the Technical Ladder.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 39 (3): 237–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P., J. Long, and T. Krauze. 1982. “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47 (5): 615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P., and J. Stewart. 1974. “Productivity Differences among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage.” American Sociological Review 39 (4): 596–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. 1997. “The Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks.” Management Science 45 (7): 905–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, S., and L. Fleming. 2018. “Paradise of Novelty – Or Loss of Human Capital? Exploring New Fields and Inventive Output.” Organization Science 29 (6): 1074–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audia, P., and J. Goncalo. 2007. “Past Success and Creativity Over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry.” Management Science 53 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., J. Graff Zivin, and J. Wang. 2010. “Superstar Extinction.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (2): 549–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, J., D. Verhoeven, L. Zhang, and B. Van Looy. 2016. “Patent Citation Indicators: One Size Fits all?” Scientometrics 106 (1): 187–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N., R. Grimaldi, and M. Sobrero. 2007. “To Patent or not to Patent? A Survey of Italian Inventors on Motivations, Incentives, and Obstacles to University Patenting.” Scientometrics 70 (2): 333–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruffaldi, S., F. Visentin, and A. Conti. 2016. “The Productivity of Science & Engineering PhD Students Hired from Supervisors’ Networks.” Research Policy 45 (4): 785–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batey, M., A. Furnham, and X. Safiullina. 2010. “Intelligence, General Knowledge and Personality as Predictors of Creativity.” Learning and Individual Differences 20 (5): 532–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W., M. Schilling, and E. Wolff. 2009. “The Superstar Inventors and Entrepreneurs: How Were They Educated?” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18 (3): 711–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., and M. Feldman. 2008. “Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level.” Organization Science 19 (1): 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla, A., and D. Hedge. 2014. “An Organizational Perspective on Patenting and Open Innovation.” Organization Science 25 (6): 1744–1763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R., C. Behymer, and D. Hall. 1978. “Research Notes: Correlates of Faculty Publications.” Sociology of Education 51 (2): 132–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomkvist, K., P. Kappen, and I. Zander. 2014. “Superstar Inventors – Towards a People-Centric Perspective on the Geography of Technological Renewal in the Multinational Corporation.” Research Policy 43 (4): 669–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2009. “Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows.” Journal of Economic Geography 9 (4): 439–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldas, S., and C. Bankston. 1997. “The Effect of School Population Socioeconomic Status on Individual Student Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Research 90 (5): 269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabchoub, N., and J. Niosi. 2005. “Explaining the Propensity to Patent Computer Software.” Technovation 25 (9): 971–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente, F. 1973. “Early Career Determinants of Research Productivity.” American Journal of Sociology 79 (2): 409–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, S., and J. Cole. 1967. “Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science.” American Sociological Review 32 (3): 377–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, R. 2014. “Do non-Competition Agreements Lead Firms to Pursue Risky R&D Projects?” Strategic Management Journal 35 (8): 1230–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, R., A. Gambardella, and M. Mariani. 2014. “Learning to be Edison: Inventors, Organizations, and Breakthrough Inventions.” Organization Science 25 (3): 833–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., A. Filippetti, and S. Iammarino. 2017. “Academic Inventors: Collaboration and Proximity with Industry.” Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (4): 730–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., K. Hussinger, and C. Schneider. 2009. “Why Challenge the Ivory Tower? New Evidence on the Basicness of Academic Patents.” KYKLOS 62 (4): 488–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., K. Hussinger, and C. Schneider. 2012. “The Nexus Between Science and Industry: Evidence from Faculty Inventions.” Journal of Technology Transfer 37 (5): 755–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., and P. David. 1994. “Toward a new Economics of Science.” Research Policy 23 (5): 487–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewett, T. 2007. “Linking Intrinsic Motivation, Risk Taking, and Employee Creativity in an R&D Environment.” R&D Management 37 (3): 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, J. S., and B. Bozeman. 2005. “Academic Careers, Patents, and Productivity: Industry Experience as Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy 34 (3): 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, W., F. Murray, and T. Stuart. 2006. “Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences.” Science 313 (5787): 665–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T., and G. Eirich. 2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology 32 (1): 271–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, R., S. Smith, and T. Ward. 2002. “The Use of Environmental Clues During Incubation.” Creativity Research Journal 14 (3/4): 287–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp, and G. Wagner. 2011. “Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants, and Behavioural Consequences.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (3): 522–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. (1995): How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories, in: R. Sternberg, J. Davidson (eds.), The Nature of Insight, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 365–396.
   Google Scholar
• Frietsch, R., I. Haller, M. Funken-Vrohlings, and H. Grupp. 2009. “Gender-specific Patterns in Patenting and Publishing.” Research Policy 38 (4): 590–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosch, K., D. Harhoff, K. Hoisl, C. Steinle, and T. Zwick. 2014. “Clean Technology Innovations in Germany: Human Capital Accumulation Under Heterogeneous Knowledge Inputs - Data and Methodology Report”, mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., and V. Bachtiar. 2008. “Personality and Intelligence as Predictors of Creativity.” Personality and Individual Differences 45 (7): 613–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., M. Batey, T. Booth, V. Patel, and D. Lozinskaya. 2011. “Individual Differences Predictors of Creativity in art and Science Students.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 6 (2): 114–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., D. Hughes, and E. Marshall. 2013. “Creativity, OCD, Narcissism and the Big Five.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 10 (1): 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Gambardella, A., D. Harhoff, and B. Verspagen. 2008. “The Value of European Patents.” European Management Review 5 (2): 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, C., W. Latham, and C. Le Bas. 2010. “Collective Knowledge, Prolific Inventors and the Value of Inventions: An Empirical Study of French, German and British Patents in the US, 1975-1999.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17 (1): 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Giuri, P., M. Mariani, S. Brusoni, G. Crespi, D. Francoz, A. Gambardella, W. Garcia-Fontes, et al. 2007. “Inventors and Invention Processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU Survey.” Research Policy 36 (8): 1107–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetze, C. 2010. “An Empirical Enquiry Into co-Patent Netwwroks and Their Stars: The Case of Cardiac Pacemaker Technology.” Technovation 30 (7/8): 436–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, B. 1986. “Adverse Selection in the Labour Market.” The Review of Economic Studies 53 (3): 325–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1986. “Productivity, R&D and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s’.” American Economic Review 76 (1): 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1990. “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4): 1661–1717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosul, M., and G. Feist. 2014. “The Creative Person in Science, Psychology of Aesthetics.” Creativitiy, and the Arts 8 (1): 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., D. Harhoff, and K. Hoisl. 2013. “Knowledge Recombination Across Technological Boundaries: Scientists vs. Engineers.” Management Science 59 (4): 837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. 2004. “Exploring the Patent Explosion.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (1-2): 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” RAND Journal of Economics 36 (1): 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., and K. Hoisl. 2007. “Institutionalized Incentives for Ingenuity: Patent Value and the German Employeeś Inventions Act.” Research Policy 36 (8): 1143–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., and K. Hoisl. 2010. “Patente in mittelständischen Unternehmen — Eine empirische Studie des Instituts fur Innovationsforschung.” Technologiemanagement und Entrepreneurship, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., F. Narin, F. M. Scherer, and K. Vopel. 1999. “Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventionś.” Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3): 511–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., and S. Wagner. 2009. “The Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office.” Management Science 55 (12): 1969–1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häussler, C., D. Harhoff, and E. Müller. 2014. “How Patenting Informs VC Investors – The Case of Biotechnology.” Research Policy 43 (8): 1286–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häussler, C., and H. Sauermann. 2013. “Credit Where Credit is Due? The Impact of Project Contributions and Social Factors on Authorship and Inventorship.” Research Policy 42 (3): 688–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 1998. “Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (1): 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoisl, K. 2007a. “Tracing Mobile Inventors - the Causality Between Inventor Mobility and Inventor Productivity.” Research Policy 36 (5): 619–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoisl, K. 2007b. “A Closer Look at Inventive Output - the Role of Age and Career Paths.” Munich School of Management Discussion Paper 12, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Hoisl, K. 2009. “Does Mobility Increase the Productivity of Inventors.” Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (2): 212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J. 1998. “Invention and Inventivity is a Random, Poisson Process: A Potential Guide to Analysis of General Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 11 (3): 231–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J. 2002. “A new Model That Generates Lotka’s Law.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (3): 209–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., Garant, J.-P., Herman, H., Munroe, D. J. (2012): “Why Don’t Women Patent?” NBER Working Paper No. 17888, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S., L. Cushenbery, and T. Friedrich. 2012. “Hiring an Innovative Workforce: A Necessary yet Uniquely Challenging Endeavor.” Human Resource Management Review 22 (4): 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. 2009. “The Burden of Knowledge and the Death of the Renaissance man: Is Innovation Getting Harder?” Review of Economic Studies 76 (1): 283–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. 2010. “Age and Great Invention.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and B. Weinberg. 2011. “Age Dynamics in Scientific Creativity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (47): 18910–18914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, T., and O. Ejermo. 2014. “Demographic Patterns and Trends in Patenting: Gender, age, and Education of Inventors.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86 (C): 110–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and G. Marschke. 2005. “Labor Mobility of Scientists, Technological Diffusion, and the Firm´s Patenting Decision.” RAND Journal of Economics 36 (2): 298–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L., L. Walker, and S. Broyles. 1996. “Creativity and the Five-Factor Model.” Journal of Research in Personality 30 (2): 189–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klevorick, A., R. Levin, R. Nelson, and S. Winter. 1995. “On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities.” Research Policy 24 (2): 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, F. 2007. “The Speed of Employer Learning.” Journal of Labor Economics 25 (1): 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplume, A., E. Xavier-Oliveira, P. Dass, and R. Thakur. 2015. “The Organizational Advantage in Early Inventing and Patenting: Empirical Evidence from Interference Proceedings.” Technovation 43-44: 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, C., and V. Sterzi. 2014. “The Role of Early-Career Factors in the Formation of Serial Academic Inventors.” Science and Public Policy 41 (4): 464–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, E. 1986. “Raids and Offer-Matching.” Research in Labor Economics 8 (Part A): 141–165.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, R., A. Klevorick, R. Nelson, and S. Winter. 1987. “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 18 (3): 783–831.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S., and P. Stephan. 1991. “Research Productivity Over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academics Scientists.” The American Review 81 (1): 114–132.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, L. 1986. “Prolific Inventors – A Bibliometric Analysis.” Scientometrics 10 (1/2): 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, F., and D. Siegel. 1991. “The Impact of R&D Investment on Productivity – new Evidence Using Linked R&D-LRD Data.” Economic Inquiry 29 (2): 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfield, E. 1971. “Output and Recognition of Sociologists.” The American Sociologists 6 (2): 128–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W., K. Hsu, H. Chen, and W. Chang. 2013. “Different Attentional Traits, Different Creativities.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 9 (1): 96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Long, C. 2002. “Patent Signals.” The University of Chicago Law Review 69 (2): 625–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotka, A. 1926. “The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16 (12): 317–323.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1980. “Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing.” American Economic Review 70 (5): 863–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1986. “Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study.” Management Science 32 (2): 173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani, M., and M. Romanelli. 2007. “Stacking and Picking Inventions: The Patenting Behavior of European Inventors.” Research Policy 36 (8): 1128–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. 1987. “Creativity, Divergent Thinking, and Openness to Experience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6): 1258–1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R., and P. Costa. 2006. Personality in Adulthood – A Five-Factor Theory Perspective. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Melero, E., and N. Palomeras. 2015. “The Renaissance Man is not Dead! The Role of Generalists in Teams of Inventors.” Research Policy 44 (1): 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melero, E., N. Palomeras, and D. Werheim. 2020. “The Effect of Patent Protection on Inventor Mobility.” Management Science 66 (12): 5485–5504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. 1973a. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science, edited by N. Storer, 267–278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. 1973b. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” In The Sociology of Science, edited by N. Storer, 439–459. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naldi, F., D. Luzi, A. Valente, and I. Vannini Parenti. 2005. “Scientific and Technological Performance by Gender.” In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, edited by H. Moed, W. Glänzel, and U. Schmoch, 299–314. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Narin, F., and A. Breitzman. 1995. “Inventive Productivity.” Research Policy 24 (4): 507–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi, K., and S. Nagaoka. 2012. “Life-cycle Productivity of Industrial Inventors: Education and Other Determinants.” Discussion Papers 12059, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., and W. Powell. 2001. “To Patent or not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (1/2): 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J., and C. Shalley. 2003. “The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 28 (1): 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. 1965. “Networks of Scientific Papers.” Science 149 (3683): 510–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reskin, B. 1977. “Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science.” American Sociological Review 42 (3): 491–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapsalis, E., B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, and R. Navon. 2006. “Academic Versus Industry Patenting: An in-Depth Analysis of What Determines Patent Value.” Research Policy 35 (10): 1631–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. 1999. New Perspectives on Economic Growth and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schönberg, U. 2007. “Testing for Asymmetric Employer Learning.” Journal of Labor Economics 25 (4): 651–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schupp, J., and J. Gerlitz. 2014. “Big Five Inventory-SOEP (BFI-S).” Zusammenstellung Sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS), https://doi.org/10.6102/zis54.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P., E. Nussbaum, C. Berg, and C. Martin. 2009. “Openness to Experience Plasticity and Creativity: Exploring Lower-Order, Higher-Order and Interactive Effects.” Journal of Research in Personality 43 (6): 1087–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. 1988. “Age and Outstanding Achievement: What Do We Know After a Century of Research?” Psychological Bulletin 104 (2): 251–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. 1992. “The Social Context of Career Success and Course for 2,026 Scientists and Inventors.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (4): 452–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. 1997. “Creative Productivity: A Predictive and Explanatory Model of Career Trajectories and Landmarks.” Psychological Review 104 (1): 66–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. 2003a. “Exceptional Creativity Across the Life Span: The Emergence and Manifestation of Creative Genius.” In The International Handbook on Innovation, edited by Larisa Shavinina, 293–308. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. 2003b. “Creativity as Variation and Selection: Some Critical Constraints.” In Critical Creative Processes, edited by M. A. Runco, 3–18. New York: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., P. Almeida, and G. Wu. 2003. “Learning-by-Hiring: When is Mobility More Likely to Facility Interfirm Knowledge Transfer?” Management Science 49 (4): 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniana, A., K. Limb, and S. Pek-Hooi. 2013. “When Birds of a Feather Dońt Flock Together: Different Scientists and the Roles They Play in Biotech R&D Alliances.” Research Policy 42 (3): 595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, S., and J. Choi. 2009. “Do Big Five Personality Factors Affect Individual Creativity? The Moderating Role of Extrinsic Motivation.” Social Behavior and Personality 37 (7): 941–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen, O., and L. Väänänen. 2012. “Returns to Inventors.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 94 (4): 1173–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen, O., and L. Väänänen. 2016. “Education and Invention.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 98 (2): 382–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M. 1990. “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations.” The RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1): 172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Looy, B., J. Callaert, and K. Debackere. 2006. “Publicaton and Patent Behaviour of Academic Researchers: Conflicting Reinforcing or Merely co-Existing.” Research Policy 35 (4): 596–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C. 1984. “Multiple Independent Invention and the Process of Technological Innovation.” Technovation 2 (3): 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J., and S. Nagaoka. 2009. “Who Invents? Evidence from the Japan-U.S. Inventor Survey,” RIETI Discussion Paper Series 09-E-034, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, K. 2011. “Mothers of Invention? Gender, Motherhood, and new Dimensions of Productivity in the Science Profession.” Work and Occupations 38 (3): 417–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, K., and L. Smith-Doerr. 2005. “Gender and Commercial Science: Women’s Patenting in the Life Sciences.” Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (4): 355–370.
   Google Scholar
• Younge, K., and M. Marx. 2016. “The Value of Employee Retention: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 25 (3): 652–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L., M. Darby, and J. Armstrong. 2002. “Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology.” Management Science 48 (1): 138–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L., M. Darby, and M. Brewer. 1998. “Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises.” American Economic Review 88 (1): 290–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L., M. Darby, J. Furner, R. Liu, and H. Ma. 2007. “Minerva Unbound: Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and new Knowledge Production.” Research Policy 36 (6): 850–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. 1967. “The Sociology of the Nobel Prizes.” Scientific American 217 (5): 25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, T., and K. Frosch. 2017. “Attenuation Bias When Measuring Inventive Performance.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (3): 195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, T., K. Frosch, K. Hoisl, and D. Harhoff. 2017. “The Power of Individual-Level Drivers of Inventive Performance.” Research Policy 46 (1): 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar