Mission-oriented R&D and growth of Japan 1988–2016: a comparison with private and public R&D

References

• Archibugi, Daniele, and Andrea Filippetti. 2018. “The Retreat of Public Research and its Adverse Consequences on Innovation.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 127: 97–111. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteriou, D., and S. G. Hall. 2021. Applied Econometrics. Fourth Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. 1967. “Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis.” The American Economic Review 57 (3): 415–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. 2015. “Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Economic Surveys 29 (5): 917–942. doi:10.1111/joes.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. I., and P. Mohnen. 1998. “International R&D Spillovers Between U.S. and Japanese R&D Intensive Sectors.” Journal of International Economics 44: 315–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, Caroline. 2021. Accounting for Japan’s Lost Score. MPRA Paper No. 109285. 21 August.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing, P., and P. Hünermund. 2020. “A Global Decline in Research Productivity? Evidence from China and Germany.” Economics Letters 197: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswijk, H. P. 1996. “Testing Identifiability of Cointegrating Vectors.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14 (2): 153–160. doi:10.1080/07350015.1996.10524641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., and G. Peri. 2007. “The International Dynamics of R&D and Innovation in the Long Run and in the Short Run.” The Economic Journal 117: 486–511. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02027.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L., and Y. Nakamura. 2003. Structural impediments to growth in Japan, NBER Conference Report series. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 191–223.
   Google Scholar
• Castellacci, Fulvio, and Jose Miguel Natera. 2013. “The Dynamics of National Innovation Systems: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the Coevolution Between Innovative Capability and Absorptive Capacity.” Research Policy 42 (3): 579–594. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, J.-T. 1991. “From ‘Mission-Oriented’ to ‘Diffusion-Oriented’ Paradigm: The new Trend of U.” S. Industrial Technology Policy. Technovation 11 (6): 339–356. Also available online as MIT Sloan School of Management WP 3225-90-BPS, Nov 1990.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A., and B. H. Hall. 2000. “Heart of Darkness: Modeling Public–Private Funding Interactions Inside the R&D Black box.” Research Policy 29: 1165–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon. 2004. Econometric Theory and Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleidi, Matteo, and Mariana Mazzucato. 2021. “Directed Innovation Policies and the Supermultiplier: An Empirical Assessment of Mission-Oriented Policies in the US Economy.” Research Policy 50 (2): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. 1997. “Engines of Growth: Domestic and Foreign Sources of Innovation.” Japan and the World Economy 9: 235–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, W. 2015. Applied Econometric Time Series. 4th edition. City: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ergas, Henry. 1987. “Does Technology Policy Matter?” In Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy, edited by Bruce R. Guile, and Harvey Brooks, 191–245. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• ESIR. 2017. Towards a Mission-Oriented Research and Innovation Policy in the European Union. An ESIR Memorandum (December 2017). Brussel: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EViews 12. 2020. User’s Guide II. Seal Beach: IHS Global.
   Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. C., R. Inklaar, and M. P. Timmer. 2015. “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table.” American Economic Review 105 (10): 3150–3182. doi:10.1257/aer.20130954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson. 2012. “Public R&D and Social Challenges: What Lessons from Mission R&D Programs?” Research Policy 41: 1697–1702. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukao, K., T. Makino, and T. Settsu. 2021. “Human Capital and Economic Growth in Japan: 1885–2015.” Journal of Economic Surveys 35 (3): 710–740. doi:10.1111/joes.12419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalo, J., and C. Granger. 1995. “Estimation of Common Long-Memory Components in Cointegrated Systems.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13 (1): 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goolsbee, A. 1998. Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers? NBER WP 6532.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. India: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B., J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen. 2010. “Measuring the Returns to R&D.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 2, edited by Bronwyn H. Hall, and Nathan Rosenberg, 1033–1082. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, F., and E. C. Prescott. 2002. “The 1990s in Japan: A Lost Decade.” Review of Economic Dynamics 5: 206–235. doi:10.1006/redy.2001.0149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, E., and P. Österholm. 2010. “Testing for Cointegration Using the Johansen Methodology When Variables are Near-Integrated: Size Distortions and Partial Remedies.” Empirical Economics 39: 51–76. doi:10.1007/s00181-009-0294-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosono, Kaoru, and Miho Takizawa. 2022. “Japan's Productivity Stagnation: Using Dynamic Hsieh–Klenow Decomposition.” Contemporary Economic Policy 40: 218–232. doi:10.1111/coep.12547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeuchi, Kenta, Young Gak Kim, Hyeog Ug Kwon, and Kyoji Fukao. 2022. “Productivity Dynamics in Japan and the Negative Exit Effect.” Contemporary Economic Policy 40: 204–217. doi:10.1111/coep.12546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusélius, K. 2006. The Cointegrated VAR Model: Methodology and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jusélius, K., N. Framroze Møller, and F. Tarp. 2014. “The Long-Run Impact of Foreign Aid in 36 African Countries: Insights from Multivariate Time Series Analysis.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 76 (2): 153–184. doi:10.1111/obes.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaihatsu, S., and T. Kurozumi. 2014. “What Caused Japan’s Great Stagnation in the 1990s?” Evidence from an Estimated DSGE Model. Journal of the Japanese and the International Economies 34: 217–235. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2014.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N., and J. A. Mirrlees. 1962. “A Growth Model with Induced Technical Progress.” Review of Economic Studies 29: 174–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M., and K. B. Luintel. 2006. “Sources of Knowledge and Productivity: How Robust is the Relationship?” OECD STI Working Paper 2006/6.
   Google Scholar
• Kilian, L., and H. Lütkepohl. 2017. Structural Vector Autoregressive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, S.-H. P. 1997. “Using Stochastic Growth Models Unit Roots and Breaking Trends.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21: 1645–1667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luintel, K. B., and M. Khan. 2004. “Are International R&D Spillovers Costly for the United States?” The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (4): 896–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luintel, K. B., M. Khan, and K. Theodoridis. 2014. “On the Robustness of R&D.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 42: 137–155. doi:10.1007/s11123-013-0360-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl, H. 2005. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. In European Commission (2018) Science, Research, and Innovation Performance of the EU 2018. Strengthening the foundations for Europe's future. Brussels, 396–427. Download: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/rec-17-015-srip-report2018_mep-web-20180228.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• METI. 2018. Report on Digital Transformation (DX). Summary. Download 29-7-2021, 16:39 from https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/pdf/0907_004a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, Enrico, Claudia Steinwender, and John Van Reenen. 2020. The Intellectual Spoils of War? Defense R&D, Productivity and International Spillovers. NBER Working Paper No. 26483.
   Google Scholar
• Mukerji, Vatsala. 1963. “A Generalized S.M.A.C. Function with Constant Ratios of Elasticity of Substitution.” The Review of Economic Studies 30 (3): 233–236.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. The impact of r&d investment on economic performance: a review of the econometric evidence. DSTI/STP/NESTI(2017)12.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa, K., E. Sterken, and I. Tokutsu. 2016. International R&D Spillovers and Marginal Social Returns on R&D. CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 6255.
   Google Scholar
• Okamuro, Hiroyuki, and Yohei Sakuma. 2021. The Effects of R&D Tax Incentive Reform on R&D Expenditures: The Case of 2009 Reform in Japan. TDB-CAREE Discussion Paper Series, No. E-2021-04, August.
   Google Scholar
• Pallante, Gianluca, Emanuele Russo, and Andrea Roventini. 2021. Does mission-oriented funding stimulate private R&D? Evidence from military R&D for US states, LEM Working Paper Series, No. 2020/32, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Pisa.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, K. 2000. An Introduction to Applied Econometrics: A Time-Series Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2015. Time Series and Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, H. H., and Y. Shin. 1998. “Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models.” Economics Letters 58: 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., Y. Shin, and R. P. Smith. 1999. “Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (446): 621–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, E. S. 1966. “Models of Technical Progress and the Golden Rule of Research.” The Review of Economic Studies 33 (2): 133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, Naqeeb Ur, Eglantina Hysa, and Xuxin Mao. 2020. “Does Public R&D Complement or Crowd-out Private R&D in pre and Post Economic Crisis of 2008?” Journal of Applied Economics 23 (1): 349–371. doi:10.1080/15140326.2020.1762341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIETI. 2008. Innovation Process and Performance: Findings and lessons from inventors surveys in Japan, the U.S., and Europe. Download from 29-7-2021 from https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/events/08011101/summary3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Shell, Karl. 1967. “A Model of Inventive Activity and Capital Accumulation.” In Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, edited by Karl Shell, 67–85. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L., K. Guy, et al. 2009. The Role of Community Research Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Brussel: EC Expert Group.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L., B. Verspagen, and T. H. W. Ziesemer. 2020. “The Productivity Effect of Public R&D in the Netherlands.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 29 (1): 31–47. doi:10.1080/10438599.2019.1580813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soete, L., B. Verspagen, and T. H. W. Ziesemer. 2022. “The Economic Impact of Public R&D: An International Perspective.” Industrial and Corporate Change 31 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1093/icc/dtab066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soete, L. en A. Arundel (red.). 1993. An Integrated Approach to European Innovation and Technology Diffusion Policy. SPRINT. Brussel: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Sveikauskas, Leo. 2007. R&D and Productivity Growth: A Review of the Literature. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Working Paper 408, September.
   Google Scholar
• Van Elk, R., B. ter Weel, K. van der Wiel, and B. Wouterse. 2019. “Estimating the Returns to Public R&D Investments: Evidence from Production Function Models.” De Economist 167 (1): 45–87. doi:10.1007/s10645-019-09331-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Elk, R., B. Verspagen, B. Ter Weel, K. Van der Wiel, and B. Wouterse. 2015. A macroeconomic analysis of the returns to public R&D investments. UNU-MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B. 1995. “R&D and Productivity: A Broad Cross-Section Cross-Country Look.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 6 (2): 117–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. 1973. “Zur Langfristigen ökonomischen Entwicklung Eines Kapitalistischen Systems.” Leviathan 1 (2): 161–188.
   Google Scholar
• Wada, S. 2008. Realizing Japan as a “Nation Built on Scientific and Technological Creativity”. Download from https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/events/08011101/pdf/6-4_E_Wada_Shuichi_PPT_t.pdf at 29-7-2021, 17:37.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, G., and V. Reinthaler. 2008. “The Effectiveness of Subsidies Revisited: Accounting for Wage and Employment Effects in Business R&D.” Research Policy 37: 1403–1412. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2013. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Fifth Edition. Mason: Cencage Learning South Western.
   Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. 1990. “Public Factors and Democracy in Poverty Analysis.” Oxford Economic Papers 42 (1): 268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. 1995. “Endogenous Growth with Public Factors and Heterogeneous Human Capital Producers.” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 52 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. H. W. 2020. “Japan’s Productivity and GDP Growth: The Role of Private, Public and Foreign R&D 1967–2017.” Economies 8 (4): 1–25. doi:10.3390/economies8040077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. H. W. 2021a. “Semi-endogenous Growth Models with Domestic and Foreign Private and Public R&D Linked to VECMs.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 30 (6): 621–642. doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1760423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. H. W. 2021b. “The Effects of R&D Subsidies and Publicly Performed R&D on Business R&D: A Survey.” Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, IEF 236 (1): 171–205. doi:10.7866/HPE-RPE.21.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. H. W. 2021c. “The Impact of Mission-Oriented R&D on Domestic and Foreign Private and Public R&D, Total Factor Productivity and GDP.” Journal of Applied Economics 24 (1): 460–477. doi:10.1080/15140326.2021.1963395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. H. W. 2021d. “Labour-augmenting Technical Change Data for Alternative Elasticities of Substitution: Growth, Slowdown, and Distribution Dynamics.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Online. doi:10.1080/10438599.2021.1956316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziesemer, T. H. W. 2022. “Foreign R&D Spillovers to the USA and Strategic Reactions.” Applied Economics 54 (37): 4274–4291. doi:10.1080/00036846.2022.2030042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar