Social identity and procedural justice in police encounters with the public: results from a randomised controlled trial

References

• Abrams, D. and Hogg, M.A., 1990. Social identity theory: constructive and critical advances. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Antrobus, E., et al., 2014. Non-response bias in randomized control experiments in criminology: Putting the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET) under a microscope. Evaluation review [online first]. Available from: http://erx.sagepub.com/content/37/3-4/197.long [ Accessed 30 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J.L. and Wothke, W., 1999. Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011. Census Quick Stats–Greater Brisbane. Available from: http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/3GBRI?opendocument&navpos=220 [Accessed 12 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A. and Tankebe, J., 2012. Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of criminal law and criminology, 102, 120–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., 2014. Policing and social identity: procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and society, 24 (1), 22–43. 10.1080/10439463.2012.724068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., Murphy, K., & Jackson, J., 2014. Officers as mirrors: policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British journal of criminology, 54 (4), 527–550. 10.1093/bjc/azu021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V., 2009. Defiance in taxation and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781848449077
   Google Scholar
• Cherney, A. and Murphy, K., 2013. Policing terrorism with procedural justice: the role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology, 46 (3), 403–421. 10.1177/0004865813485072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Immigration and Citizenship, 2012. Fact sheet 15 – population growth. Available from: http://www.immi.gov.au/media/fact-sheets/15population.htm [Accessed 12 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., 2010. Four ingredients: new recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing. Policing, 4 (4), 403–410. 10.1093/police/paq041
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S., 2004. Psychology in organizations: the social identity approach. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hohl, K., Bradford, B., and Stanko, E.A., 2010. Influencing trust and confidence in the London Metropolitan Police. British journal of criminology, 50 (3), 491–513. 10.1093/bjc/azq005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-t. and Bentler, P.M., 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6 (1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y.J., 2003. Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 29 (3), 336–348. 10.1177/0146167202250222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y.J., et al., 1996. Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological science, 7 (1), 40–45. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. and Sunshine, J., 2007. Public confidence in policing: An neo-durkheimian perspective. British journal of criminology, 47 (2), 214–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., et al., 2012. Why do people comply with the law?: legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British journal of criminology, 52 (6), 1051–1071. 10.1093/bjc/azs032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., et al., 2013. Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, A.E. and Tyler, T., 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S.D., Snipes, J.B., and Supina, A.E., 1996. Compliance on demand: the public’s response to specific police requests. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 33 (3), 269–305. 10.1177/0022427896033003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., et al., 2012. Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of experimental criminology, 8 (4), 343–367. 10.1007/s11292-012-9160-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., et al., 2013a. Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: a randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51 (1), 33–63. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., et al., 2013b. Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of experimental criminology, 9 (3), 245–274. 10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., 2009. Public satisfaction with police: the importance of procedural justice and police performance in police–citizen encounters. Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology, 42 (2), 159–178. 10.1375/acri.42.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., 2013. Policing at the margins: fostering trust and cooperation among ethnic minority groups. Journal of policing, intelligence and counter terrorism, 8 (2), 184–199. 10.1080/18335330.2013.821733
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. and Cherney, A., 2011. Fostering cooperation with the police: how do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing? Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology, 44 (2), 235–257. 10.1177/0004865811405260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Hinds, L., and Fleming, J., 2008. Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and society, 18 (2), 136–155. 10.1080/10439460802008660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Murphy, B., and Mearns, M., 2010. The 2007 public safety and security in Australia survey': survey methodology and preliminary findings. Working paper no. 16. Geelong, VIC: Alfred Deakin Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Mazerolle, L., and Bennett, S., 2014. Promoting trust in police: findings from a randomized experimental field trial of procedural justice policing. Policing & society, 24 (4), 405–424.10.1080/10439463.2013.862246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Haslam, S.A., and Jans, L., 2013. A single-item measure of social identification: reliability, validity, and utility. British journal of social psychology, 52 (4), 597–617. 10.1111/bjso.12006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, P.I., 1993. Of every hue and caste: race, immigration, and perceptions of pluralism. Annals of the American academy of political and social science, 530 (1), 187–202. 10.1177/0002716293530001013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H.J., et al., 1998. The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of experimental social psychology, 34 (5), 470–493. 10.1006/jesp.1998.1360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J. and Tyler, T.R., 2003. The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and society review, 37 (3), 513–548. 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S., 2007. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., 2010. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. and Walker, L., 1975. Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 1989. The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group-value model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57 (5), 830–838. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 1997. The psychology of legitimacy: a relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and social psychology review, 1 (4), 323–345. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 2006. Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., 2008. Psychology and institutional design. Review of law and economics, 4 (3), 801–887. 10.2202/1555-5879.1233
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. and Blader, S.L., 2003. The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behaviour. Personality and social psychology review, 7 (4), 349–361. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. and Fagan, J., 2008. Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State journal of criminal law, 6, 231–276.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. and Huo, Y.J., 2002. Trust in the law. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. and Lind, E.A., 1990. Intrinsic versus community-based justice models: when does group membership matter? Journal of social issues, 46 (1), 83–94. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., et al.., 1997. Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar