Prosecutors’ perceptions of how to improve the quality of evidence in domestic violence cases

References

• Ariel, B., Farrar, W.A., and Sutherland, A., 2014. The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of quantitative criminology, 1–27. doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, K.A., et al., 2012. Predictors of domestic violence prosecution in a state court. Victims & offenders, 7 (2), 143–160. doi:10.1080/15564886.2012.657289
   Google Scholar
• Beloof, D.E. and Shapiro, J., 2002. Let the truth be told: proposed hearsay exceptions to admit domestic violence victims' out of court statements as substantive evidence. Columbia journal of gender & law, 11, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Brekke, N., and Borgida, E., 1988. Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: a social-cognitive analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 55 (3), 372–386. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, M., 2011. Legal responses to domestic violence. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D., et al., 2004. Evaluation of specialist domestic violence courts/fast track systems. London: Crown Prosecution Service.
   Google Scholar
• Corsilles, A., 1994. No-drop policies in the prosecution of domestic violence cases: guarantee to action or dangerous solution. Fordham law review, 63, 853–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2009. Report of a joint thematic review of victim and witness experiences in the criminal justice system. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, J., et al., 2007. Displayed emotion and witness credibility: a comparison of judgements by individuals and mock juries. Applied cognitive psychology, 21, 1145–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., et al., 2009. A modified cognitive interview procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied cognitive psychology, 23 (5), 698–716. doi:10.1002/acp.1501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D.J., et al., 2001. Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, public policy, and law, 7 (3), 622–727. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, L., 2002. Prosecuting domestic violence without victim participation. Modern law review, 65 (6), 834–858. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00412
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, L. and Munro, V.E., 2009. Of ‘normal sex’ and ‘real rape’: exploring the use of socio-sexual scripts in (mock) jury deliberation. Social & legal studies, 18 (3), 291–312. doi:10.1177/0964663909339083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, L. and Munro, V.E., 2014. ‘Telling tales’: exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury room. Legal studies, 35 (2), 201–225. doi:10.1111/lest.12051
   Google Scholar
• Ellsberg, M., et al., 2008. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. The lancet, 371 (9619), 1165–1172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60522-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., 1999. Effective intervention in domestic violence cases: rethinking the role of prosecutors, judges, and the court system. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 11, 3–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., and Tesch-Römer, C., 1993. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological review, 100 (3), 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P. and Geiselman, R.E., 1992. Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: the cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, R.D. and McCormack, B., 2002. Dial-in testimony. University of Pennsylvania law review, 150 (4), 1171–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, J.H. and Maxwell, C.D., 2008. Prosecution and conviction rates for intimate partner violence. Criminal justice review, 34 (1), 44–79. doi:10.1177/0734016808324231
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gwinn, C.G. and O'Dell, A., 1992. Stopping the violence: the role of the police officer and the prosecutor. Western State University law review, 20, 297–317.
   Google Scholar
• Gwinn, C., et al., 2007. Family justice center collaborative model. Saint Louis University public law review, 27, 79–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, C., 1996. No right to choose: mandated victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Harvard law review, 109 (8), 1849–1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, M., 2006. Making it through the criminal justice system: attrition and domestic violence. Social policy and society, 5 (1), 79–90. doi:10.1017/S1474746405002769
   Google Scholar
• Hester, M. and Westmarland, N., 2005. Tackling domestic violence: effective interventions and approaches. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC, 2014. Everyone’s business: improving the police response to domestic abuse. London: HMIC.
   Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M.R., Milne, R., and Wagstaff, G.F., 1999. The cognitive interview: a survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, crime and law, 5 (1–2), 101–115. doi:10.1080/10683169908414996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King-Ries, A., 2004. Crawford v. Washington: the end of victimless prosecution. Seattle University law review, 28, 301–328.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, R., et al., 2007. The Evidence Act 2006: act and analysis. Wellington: Brookers.
   Google Scholar
• Matczak, A., Hatzidimitriadou, E., and Lindsay, J., 2011. Review of domestic violence policies in England & Wales. London: Kingston University and St George's, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C.A., and Fraser, J., 2010. The cognitive interview: a meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, public policy, and law, 16 (4), 340–372. doi:10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E.L., 2012. Police controlled antecedents which significantly elevate prosecution and conviction rates in domestic violence cases. Criminology and criminal justice, 13 (5), 526–551. doi:10.1177/1748895812462594
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E.L., 2013. The relationship between individual police work habits and the stated reasons prosecutors reject their domestic violence investigations. Sage open, 3 (4), 1–11. doi:10.1177/2158244013511826
   Google Scholar
• Nield, R., et al., 2003. The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 and the interviewing of vulnerable groups: a practitioner's perspective. Legal and criminological psychology, 8 (2), 223–228. doi:10.1348/135532503322362997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 2005. Qualitative research. In: B.S. Everitt and D.C. Howell, eds. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Vol. 3, 1633–1636.
   Google Scholar
• Police and Crime Standards Directorate, 2007. Guidance for the police use of body-worn video devices. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M.B., 2008. Designing effective training programs for investigative interviews of children. Current issues in criminal justice, 20, 189–208.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M.B., Fisher, R.P., and Wright, R. 2005. Investigative interviewing. In: N. Brewer and K. Williams, eds. Psychology and law: an empirical perspective. New York: Guilford, 11–42.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M.B. and Wright, R., 2009. Professionals' perceptions of electronically recorded interviews with vulnerable witnesses. Journal of the institute of criminology, 21, 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. and Cook, D., 2006. Understanding victim retraction in cases of domestic violence: specialist courts, government policy, and victim‐centred justice. Contemporary justice review, 9 (2), 189–213. doi:10.1080/10282580600785017
   Google Scholar
• Ruff, L., 2012. Does training matter? Exploring police officer response to domestic dispute calls before and after training on intimate partner violence. The police journal, 85 (4), 285–300. doi:10.1350/pojo.2012.85.4.516
   Google Scholar
• Stern, V. (2010). The Stern review. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vallely, C., et al., 2005. Evaluation of domestic violence pilot sites at Caerphilly (Gwent) and Croydon. London: Crown Prosecution Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel, E., et al., 2006. Credibility of the emotional witness: a study of ratings by court judges. Law and human behavior, 30 (2), 221–230. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9024-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westera, N., Kebbell, M., and Milne, B., 2013. It is better, but does it look better? Prosecutor perceptions of using rape complainant investigative interviews as evidence. Psychology, crime and law, 19 (7), 595–610. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2012.656119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar