What drives compliance? The effect of deterrence and shame emotions on young drivers’ compliance with road laws

References

• Ahmed, E., et al., 2001. Shame management through reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R., 1994. Criminological theories: introduction and evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R. and Sellers, C., 2004. Criminological theories: introduction, evaluation and application. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., Chiricos, T., and Waldo, G., 1977. Formal and informal sanctions: a comparison of deterrent effects. Social problems, 25, 103–114. doi: 10.2307/800471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., Harris, A.R., and Miller, J., 1983. Models of deterrence theory. Social science research, 12, 236–262. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(83)90014-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. and Kenny, D., 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, L., 2010. Parliamentary committees are important in developing policy: evidence from a Queensland case study. Australasian parliamentary review, 25, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L., 2012. The experience of learner driver, provisional drivers and supervisors with graduated driver licensing in two Australian jurisdictions. Thesis (PhD). Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L., Darvell, M., and Watson, B., 2015. Young and unaffected by road policing strategies: using deterrence theory to explain provisional drivers' (non)compliance. Australian & New Zealand journal of criminology. doi:10.1177/0004865815589824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, L., Soole, D., and Watson, B., 2012. The effectiveness of traffic policing in reducing traffic crashes. In: T. Prenzler, ed. Policing and security in practice: challenges and achievements. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 90–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L., et al., 2014a. Graduated driver licensing: an international review. Sultan Qaboos university medical journal, 14, 432–441.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L., et al., 2014b. Factors contributing to crashes among young drivers. Sultan Qaboos university medical journal, 14, e297–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Begg, D. and Stephenson, S., 2003. Graduated driver licensing: the New Zealand experience. Journal of safety research, 34, 99–105. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00087-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, E., 2013. On the importance of environments and contexts in deterrence research: the case of traffic infringements. Mt Gravatt: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, E. and Bacher, J.-L., 2007. Situational deterrence and claim padding: results from a randomized field experiment. Journal of experimental criminology, 3, 337–352. doi: 10.1007/s11292-007-9043-z
   Google Scholar
• Curry, A.E., et al., 2013. Graduated driver licensing decal law: effect on young probationary drivers. American journal of preventive medicine, 44, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doheny, K., 2013. Car tracking devices for teen drivers: monitoring can help, but it doesn't replace communication [online]. Los Angeles, CA: Edmunds. Available from: www.edmunds.com/car-technology/tracking-teen-drivers.html [Accessed 16 November 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, B., 2008. Can we rely on deterrence theory to motivate safe road user behaviour? In: ARCS-Travelsafe national conference. Brisbane: Queensland Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Elvik, R., 2010. Why some road safety problems are more difficult to solve than others. Accident analysis & prevention, 42, 1089–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiter, J. and Watson, B., 2006. The speed paradox: the misalignment between driver attitudes and speeding behaviour. Journal of Australasian college of road safety, 17, 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiter, J., et al., 2006. Significant others, who are they? – examining normative influences on speeding. Proceedings 2006 Australiasian road safety research policing education conference. Gold Coast, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, R., Feaganes, J., and Rodgman, E., 2001. Initial effects of graduated driver licensing on 16-year-old driver crashes in North Carolina. Journal of American medical association, 286, 1588–1592. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.13.1588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, R. and Goodwin, A., 2003. Enhancing the effectiveness of graduated driver licensing legislation. Journal of safety research, 34, 79–84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00083-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, K.R., et al., 2008. National young-driver survey: teen perspective and experience with factors that affect driving safety. Pediatrics, 121, 1391–1403. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A. and Foss, R., 2004. Graduated driver licensing restrictions: awareness, compliance, and enforcement in North Carolina. Journal of safety research, 35, 367–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A., et al., 2006. Encouraging compliance with graduated driver licensing restrictions. Journal of safety research, 37, 343–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H.G. and Bursik, R.J.J., 1990. Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: extending the deterrence model. Law & society review, 24, 837–861. doi: 10.2307/3053861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J., 2007. Novice teen driving: GDL and beyond. Journal of safety research, 38, 259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homel, R., 1994. Drink-driving law enforcement and the legal blood alcohol limit in New South Wales. Accident analysis & prevention, 26, 147–155. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90084-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homel, R., 2004. Drivers who drink and rational choice: random breath testing and the process of deterrence. In: R.V. Clarke and M. Felson, eds. Routine activity and rational choice: advances in criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ivers, R., et al., 2009. Novice drivers’ risky driving behavior, risk perception, and crash risk: findings from the DRIVE study. American journal of public health, 99, 1638–1644. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.150367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajunen, T. and Summala, H., 2003. Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 6, 97–107. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, J., Pan, R., and Li, J., 2012. National evaluation of the effect of graduated driver licensing laws on teenager fatality and injury crashes. Journal of safety research, 43, 29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masten, S.V. and Foss, R.D., 2010. Long-term effect of the North Carolina graduated driver licensing system on licensed driver crash incidence: a 5-year survival analysis. Accident analysis and prevention, 42, 1647–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D.R., Simpson, H.M., and Pak, A., 2003. Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accident analysis & prevention, 35, 683–691. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00047-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L. and Ransley, J., 1998. Third-party policing: prospects, challenges and implications for regulators. In: R. Johnstone and R. Sarre, eds. Regulation: enforcement and compliance. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L. and Ransley, J., 2005. Third party policing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L. and Ransley, J., 2006. The case for third-party policing. In: D. Weisburd and A. Braga, eds. Police innovation: contrasting perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Mccartt, A., et al., 2009. Effects of age and experience on young driver crashes: review of recent literature. Traffic injury prevention, 10, 209–219. doi: 10.1080/15389580802677807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccartt, A., et al., 2010. Graduated licensing laws and fatal crashes of teenage drivers: a national study. Traffic injury prevention, 11, 240–248. doi: 10.1080/15389580903578854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccartt, A.T., et al., 2012. New Jersey's license plate decal requirement for graduated driver licenses: attitudes of parents and teenagers, observed decal use, and citations for teenage driving violations. Traffic injury prevention, 14, 244–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., 2005. Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy and tax non-compliance (CTSI Working Paper 71). Canberra: The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. and Helmer, I., 2013. Testing the importance of forgiveness for reducing repeat offending. Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology, 46, 138–156. doi: 10.1177/0004865812470121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D., 1998. Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and justice, 23, 1–42. doi: 10.1086/449268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemme, H. and White, K., 2010. Texting while driving: psychosocial influences on young people's texting intentions and behaviour. Accident analysis & prevention, 42, 1257–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyens, D.M., Donmez, B., and Boyle, L.N., 2008. The Iowa graduated driver licensing program: effectiveness in reducing crashes of teenage drivers. Journal of safety research, 39, 383–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, J. and Ross, L., 1990. The effectiveness of legal sanctions in dealing with drinking drivers. Alcohol, drugs and driving, 6, 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., et al., 1998. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A.R. and Pogarsky, G., 2002. Beyond Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence: personal and vicarious experiences, impulsivity, and offending behavior. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 39, 153–186. doi: 10.1177/002242780203900202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, J.C., et al., 2009. Motor vehicle injury, mortality, and hospital charges by strength of graduated driver licensing laws in 36 States. The journal of trauma, 67, 43–53. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181937f4f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Government Document, 2003. Provisional driver and rider licence restrictions. Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, A., 1969. Principles in sentencing. Dublin university law review, 1, 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Parker, B., et al., 2012. Young, inexperienced and on the road: do novice drivers comply with road rules? Journal of the transportation research board, 2318, 98–106. doi: 10.3141/2318-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senserrick, T., 2007. Recent developments and young driver education, training and licensing in Australia. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senserrick, T. and Whelan, M., 2003. Graduated driver licensing: effectiveness of systems and individual components. Melbourne, Victoria: Monash University Accident Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Shope, J.T., 2007. Graduated driver licensing: review of evaluation results since 2002. Journal of safety research, 38, 165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbock, B., 1985. Drunk driving. Philosophy & public affairs, 14, 278–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. and Katz - Ben-Ami, L., 2012. The contribution of family climate for road safety and social environment to the reported driving behavior of young drivers. Accident analysis & prevention, 47, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, B., 2004. How effective is deterrence theory in explaining driver behaviour: a case study of unlicensed driving. Australasian road safety research, policing and education conference. 14–16 November 2004 Perth, WA. ARSRPE, 1–10. Perth, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., et al., 2004. Preliminary findings from ‘The what's fair and what's unfair survey about justice issues in the Australian tax context’ (CTSI Working Paper 59). Canberra: The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, M., Scully, J., and Newstead, S., 2009. Vehicle safety and young drivers. Melbourne, Victoria: Monash University: Accident Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Tefft, B., and Grabowski, J., 2012. Graduated driver licensing research, 2010-present. Journal of safety research, 43, 195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation, 2007. Youth and road safety. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation, 2009. Global status report on road safety: time for action. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.
   Google Scholar