References
- Ahrens, A., Hansen, C.B., and Schaffer, M.E., 2019. Lassopack: model selection prediction with regularised regression. The stata journal: promoting communications on statistics and stata, 20 (1), 176–235.
- Anderson, R.M., et al., 2020. Comment: how will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet, 395, 931–934.
- Bennett, S., and Mazerolle, L., 2020. Policing the pandemic with a PACT. Journal for women and policing, 45, 7–9.
- Bish, A., and Michie, S., 2010. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. British journal of health psychology, 15, 797–824.
- Bolger, P.C., 2015. Just following orders: a meta-analysis of the correlates of American police officer use of force decisions. American journal of criminal justice, 40 (3), 466–492. doi:10.1007/s12103-014-9278-y.
- Bolger, P.C., and Walters, G.D., 2019. The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal justice, 60, 93–99.
- Braithwaite, V., 2003. Dancing with tax authorities: motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In: V. Braithwaite, ed. Taxing democracy: understanding tax avoidance and evasion. 1st ed. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 15–39.
- Braithwaite, V., 2009. Defiance in taxation and governance: resisting and dismissing authority in a democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar/Northampton.
- Braithwaite, V., 2014. Defiance and motivational postures. In: G. Bruinsma and D. Weisburd, eds. Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. New York: Springer Science Business, 915–925.
- Braithwaite, V., Murphy, K., and Reinhart, M., 2007. Taxation threat, motivational postures and responsive regulation. Law and policy, 29 (1), 137–158.
- Brouard, S., Vasilopoulos, P., and Becher, M., 2020. Sociodemographic and psychological correlates of compliance with the COVID-19 public health measures in France. Canadian journal of political science, 53(2), 1-8. doi:10.1017/S0008423920000335.
- Chaudhry, R., et al., 2020. A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes. Eclinicalmedicine, 25, 1–8.
- Eastwood, K., et al., 2009. Responses to pandemic (H1N1) 2009, Australia. Emergency infectious diseases, 16(8), 1211–1216.
- Fagan, J., and Tyler, T., 2005. Legal socialisation of children and adolescents. Social justice research, 18 (3), 217–242.
- Gadarian, S.K., Goodman, S.W., and Pepinsky, T.B., 2020. Partisanship, health behaviour, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Unpublished manuscript. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3562796 [Accessed 4 August 2020].
- Geller, A., and Fagan, J., 2019. Police contact and the legal socialisation of urban teens. The Russell Sage foundation journal of social sciences, 5 (1), 26–49.
- Grace, S., 2020. Policing social distancing: Gaining and maintaining compliance in the age of coronavirus. Policing. Advanced online publication.
- Islam, N., et al., 2020. Physical distancing interventions and incidence of Coronavirus disease 2019: Natural experiment in 149 countries. BMJ, 370, m2743.
- Jackson, J., et al., 2012. Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British journal of criminology, 52, 1051–1071.
- Kirk, D.S., and Papachristos, A.V., 2011. Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. American journal of sociology, 116, 1190–1233.
- Kooistra, E.B., et al., 2020. Mitigating COVID-19 in a nationally representative UK sample: personal abilities to obligation to obey the law shape compliance with mitigation measures. Unpublished manuscript. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/zuc23/ [Accessed 11 August 2020].
- Lehdonvirta, V., et al., 2020. Social media, web and panel surveys: using non-probability samples in social and policy research. Policy & internet. doi:10.1002/poi3.238.
- Leung, G.M., et al., 2004. A tale of two cities: community psychobehavioral surveillance and related impact on outbreak control in Hong Kong and Singapore during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome epidemic. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 25 (12), 1033–1041.
- Liao, Q., et al., 2010. Situational awareness and health protective responses to pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional study. PLOS one, 5 (10), e13350. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013350.
- Magee, J.C., and Smith, P.K., 2013. The social distance of power. Personality and social psychology review, 17 (2), 158–186.
- Morrow, J., 2020. Coronavirus pandemic brings out the ‘sovereign citizens’. Sunday Extra, 2 August. Available from: https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/sundayextra/coronavirus-pandemic-brings-out-the-%E2%80%98sovereign-citizens%E2%80%99/12502844.
- Murphy, K., 2004. The role of trust in nurturing compliance: a study of accused tax avoiders. Law and human behavior, 28 (2), 187–209.
- Murphy, K., 2016. Turning defiance into compliance with procedural justice: understanding reactions to regulatory encounters through motivational posturing. Regulation & governance, 10, 93–109.
- Murphy, K., et al., 2020a. Attitudes towards authority during COVID-19: Technical report. Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University.
- Murphy, K., et al., 2020b. Why people comply with COVID-19 social distancing restrictions: self-interest or duty? Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology, 53 (4), 477–496. doi:10.1177/0004865820954484.
- Oosterhoff, B., and Palmer, C.A., 2020. Psychological correlates of news monitoring, social distancing, disinfecting, and hoarding behaviors among US adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unpublished manuscript. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/rpcy4/ [Accessed 14 August 2020].
- Pek, J., Wong, O., and Wong, A.C.M., 2018. How to address non-normality: a taxonomy of approaches, reviewed and illustrated. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2104.
- Plohl, N. and Musil, B., 2020. Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science. Psychology, health & medicine. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988
- Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., and Zani, B., 2011. Compliance with recommendations for pandemic influenza H1N1 2009: the role of rust and personal beliefs. Health education research, 26 (5), 761–769.
- Pratt, T.C., et al., 2006. The empirical status of deterrence theory: a meta-analysis. In F.T. Cullen, J.P. Wright, and K.R. Blevins, eds. Advances in criminological theory: Vol. 15. taking stock: the status of criminological theory. New York: Routledge, 367–395.
- Ranstam, J., and Cook, J.A., 2018. LASSO regression. British journal of statistics, 105 (10), 1348–1348.
- Rubin, G.J., et al., 2009. Public perception, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross-sectional telephone survey. BMJ, 339, b2651.
- Sargeant, E., Davoren, N., and Murphy, K., 2020. The defiant and the compliant: How does procedural justice theory explain ethnic minority group postures toward police? Policing & society. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1080/10439463.2020.1720016
- Sargeant, E., Murphy, K., and Madon, N., 2018. Is dissatisfaction with the police inevitable? Testing an integrated model of motivational postures and procedural justice police-citizen contacts. Police practice and research: an international journal, 19 (2), 125–137.
- Seidner, M.J., et al., 2020. Social distancing to slow the US COVID-19 epidemic: longitudinal pretest-posttest comparison group study. PLOS medicine, 17 (8), e1003244.
- Stogner, J., Miller, B.L., and McLean, K., 2020. Police stress, mental health, and resiliency during the COVID-19 pandemic. American journal of criminal justice, 45, 718–730.
- Tyler, T., 2006. Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Tyler, T., and Trinkner, R., 2018. Why children follow rules: legal socialization and the development of legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Van Bavel, J.J., et al., 2020. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature human behaviour, 4, 460–471.
- Van Rooij, B., et al., 2020. Compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in the United States. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-21, General Subserie Research Paper No. 2020-03.
- Webster, R.K., et al., 2020. How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence. Public health, 182, 163–169.
- White, M.D., and Fradella, H.F., 2020. Policing a pandemic: stay-at-home orders and what they mean for police. American journal of criminal justice, 45, 702–717.
- WHO. 2020a. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) dashboard. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
- WHO. 2020b. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Weekly epidemiological update and weekly operational update. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/.
- Wilson, J., 2020. Coronavirus lockdown protests may have spread virus widely. The Guardian, 18 May. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/18/lockdown-protests-spread-coronavirus-cellphone-data.
- Wise, T., et al., 2020. Change in risk perception and protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Unpublished manuscript. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/dz428/ [Accessed 10 August 2020].