Do patron bans act as a deterrent to future anti-social offending? An analysis of banning and offending data from Victoria, Australia

References

• Anderson, T.R. 2016. Review of the South Australian Liquor Licensing Act 1997. https://www.agd.sa.gov.au/sites/default/files/anderson_report_review_of_liquor_licensing_act_1997_june_2016.pdf?v=1492476510.
   Google Scholar
• Ariel, B., Bland, M., and Sutherland, A., 2017. ‘Lowering the threshold of effective deterrence’—testing the effect of private security agents in public spaces on crime: A randomized controlled trial in a mass transit system. PLos one, 12, 12, e0187392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker, G.S., 1968. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of political economy, 76 (2), 169–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, K., and Herbert, S., 2010. Banished: the new social control in urban America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, B. and Jackson, J., 2016. Enabling and constraining police power: on the moral regulation of policing. In: J Jacobs and J Jackson, eds. Routledge handbook of criminal justice ethics. Oxon: Routledge, 219–237.
   Google Scholar
• Burney, E., 2002. Talking tough, acting coy: what happened to the anti–social behaviour order? The Howard journal of criminal justice, 41 (5), 469–484.
   Google Scholar
• Chalfin, A., and McCrary, J., 2017. Criminal deterrence: a review of the literature. Journal of economic literature, 55 (1), 5–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, A., 2009. Governing through anti-social behaviour: regulatory challenges to criminal justice. British Journal of criminology, 49 (6), 810–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A., et al., 2018. Community awareness of patron banning in Australia: a brief report. Journal of police and criminal psychology, 33, 283–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andrade, D., et al., 2020. The value of identification scanner technology in monitoring and detecting banned patrons in entertainment precincts. Drug and alcohol review, online ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• de Andrade, D., Homel, R., and Townsley, M., 2016. Trouble in paradise: The crime and health outcomes of the surfers paradise licensed venue lockout. Drug and alcohol review, 35 (5), 564–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, D., 1997. Law in policing: legal regulation and police practices, vol. 77. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, N. and Poynton, S., 2019. The effect of lockout and last drinks laws on non-domestic assaults in sydney: An update to March 2019. Crime & justice bulletin, 142 (August), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, I., 1972. The deterrent effect of criminal law enforcement. The journal of legal studies, 1 (2), 259–276.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, C. 2017. Upholding whose right? Discretionary police powers to punish, collective 'pre-victimisation and the dilution of individual rights. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 50 (4), 493–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, C., 2018. Discretionary police powers to punish: a case study of Victoria’s banning notice provisions. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, C., 2019. Should Australia’s police-imposed public area banning powers be subject to independent oversight and review? Drug and alcohol review, 38 (6), 630–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, C., 2020. A civilianised summary power to exclude: perceptual deterrence, compliance and legitimacy. International journal for crime, justice & social democracy, 9 (4), online first.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, C., 2021. A unique power to punish: an examination of the operation, scrutiny, and attendant risks of licensee barring provisions in Victoria, Australia. Criminal justice policy review, 32 (2), 107–131.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, C. and Clifford, R., 2020. Spatial exclusion, due process, and the civilianization of punishment in Australia’s night-time economy: a mapping review of patron banning policy, practice, and oversight. International criminal justice review, July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, C., Clifford, R., and Miller, P., 2020. Australia’s discretionary police-imposed banning powers: oversight, scrutiny and accountability. Police practice and research, 22 (1), 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, C., Curtis, A., and Miller, P., 2018. The steady proliferation of Australia’s discretionary police-imposed patron banning powers: An unsubstantiated cycle of assertion and presumption. Criminology & criminal justice, 18 (4), 431–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, J., 2008. Rules of engagement: policing anti-social behaviour and alcohol-related violence in and around licensed premises. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J.P., 1968. Crime, punishment, and deterrence. The southwestern social science quarterly, 48 (4), 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodey, J., 2006. Ethnic profiling, criminal (in) justice and minority populationsCrit Crim, 14, 207–212.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K., and Homel, R., 2008. Raising the bar: preventing aggression in and around bars, clubs and pubs. London: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, P., Lister, S., and Traynor, P., 2009. ‘This town’s a different town today’: policing and regulating the night-time economy. Criminology & criminal justice, 9 (4), 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallsworth, S., 2006. Racial targeting and social control: looking behind the police. Critical criminology, 14 (3), 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D.A., 2006. US experiences with racial and ethnic profiling: history, current issues, and the future. Critical criminology, 14 (3), 213–239.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, V. and Dickinson, J., 2018. Public spaces protection orders: a critical policy analysis. Safer communities, 17 (3), 182–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, D., et al., 2003. Bouncers: violence and governance in the night-time economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., et al., 2008. Alcohol, nightlife and violence: the relative contributions of drinking before and during nights out to negative health and criminal justice outcomes. Addiction, 103 (1), 60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huq, A.Z., Jackson, J., and Trinkner, R., 2017. Legitimating practices: revisiting the predicates of police legitimacy. British journal of criminology, 57 (5), 1101–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B.A., 2010. Deterrence and deterrability. Criminology, 48 (2), 417–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., et al., 2005. The missing link in general deterrence research. Criminology, 43 (3), 623–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klockars, C.B., 1985. The idea of police, vol. 3. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Assembly (VIC). 2010. State of Victoria Parliamentary Debates.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D., 2009. Identifying citizens: ID cards as surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, H., et al., 2016. What deters crime? comparing the effectiveness of legal, social, and internal sanctions across countries. Frontiers in psychology, 7 (85), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matthews, S.K., and Agnew, R., 2008. Extending deterrence theory: do delinquent peers condition the relationship between perceptions of getting caught and offending? Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 45 (2), 91–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawby, R.I., 2017. Policing low level public disorder, antisocial behaviour and alcohol-related crime: from the metropolis to the tourist resort. European law enforcement research bulletin, 2, 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., et al., 2013. Legitimacy in policing: a systematic review. Campbell systematic reviews, 9 (1), i–147.
   Google Scholar
• McAtamney, A., and Morgan, A., 2009. Key issues in antisocial behaviour. Research in practice no. 5. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, A., 2009. Offenders’ perceptions of the sentencing process: a study of deterrence and stigmatisation in the New South Wales children’s court. Australian & New Zealand journal of criminology, 42 (1), 24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, L. and Quilter, J., 2015. Public intoxication in NSW: The contours of criminalisation. Sydney law review, 37 (1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez, P., et al., 2015. Lockouts and last drinks: the impact of the January 2014 liquor licence reforms on assaults in NSW, Australia. BOCSAR NSW crime and justice bulletins, 183, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Menéndez, P., Kypri, K., and Weatherburn, D., 2017. The effect of liquor licensing restrictions on assault: a quasi-experimental study in sydney, Australia. Addiction, 112 (2), 261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., et al., 2015. Interventions for reducing alcohol supply, alcohol demand and alcohol-related harm. Final report. Canberra: National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., et al., 2016. Patron banning in the nightlife entertainment districts: a key informant perspective. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 77 (4), 606–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P.G., et al., 2017. Queensland alcohol-related violence and night time economy monitoring project (QUANTEM): a study protocol. BMC public health, 17 (789), 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, P., et al.. 2019. Queensland alcohol-related violence and night time economy monitoring (QUANTEM). Geelong: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• NABCP, 2020. National Association of Business Crime Partnerships. https://www.nabcp.com [Accessed 9 Apr 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D.S., and Pogarsky, G., 2001. Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: theory and evidence. Criminology, 39 (4), 865–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northern Territory Government, 2017. Alcohol policies and legislation review. Final report. https://alcoholreform.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/453497/Alcohol-Policies-and-Legislation-Review-Final-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D., and Warren, I., 2014. The pursuit of exclusion through zonal banning. Australian & New Zealand Journal of criminology, 47 (3), 429–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., 2010. How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? The journal of criminal law and criminology, 100 (3), 765–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piza, E.L., et al., 2019. CCTV surveillance for crime prevention: a 40-year systematic review with meta-analysis. Criminology & public policy, 18 (1), 135–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B.J., et al., 2013. An examination of the impact of unpaid infringement notices on disadvantaged groups and the criminal justice system-towards a best practice model. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sivasubramaniam, D., and Goodman-Delahunty, J., 2008. Ethnicity and trust: perceptions of police bias. International journal of police science & management, 10 (4), 388–401.
   Google Scholar
• Søgaard, T.F., 2017. Voices of the banned: emergent causality and the unforeseen consequences of patron banning policies. Contemporary drug problems, 45 (1), 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, A.B., 2019. Examining offending behaviour following receipt of a business crime reduction partnership’s place-based exclusion sanction. Criminology & criminal justice, online first.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvestre, M.E., et al., 2015. Spatial tactics in criminal courts and the politics of legal technicalities. Antipode, 47 (5), 1346–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., et al., 2018. A mapping review of evaluations of alcohol policy restrictions targeting alcohol-related harm in night-time entertainment precincts. International journal of drug policy, 62, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonry, M., 2008. Learning from the limitations of deterrence research. Crime and justice, 37 (1), 279–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 2006. Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., and Jackson, J., 2014. Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, public policy, and law, 20 (1), 78–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., and Wakslak, C.J., 2004. Profiling and police legitimacy: procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42 (2), 253–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VCGLR, 2019. Designated areas. https://www.vcglr.vic.gov.au/community-services/government-initiatives/designated-areas 2019; https://www.vcglr.vic.gov.au/community-services/government-initiatives/designated-areas.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, A., et al., 1999. Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: an analysis of recent research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wadds, P., 2019. ‘It’s not like it used to be’: respect and nostalgia in the policing of nightlife. Australian & New Zealand journal of criminology, 52 (2), 213–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WA Independent Review Committee, 2014. Liquor Control Act 1988 review report. https://www.rgl.wa.gov.au/docs/default-source/rgl/23-12-2013—liquor-control-act-1988-review-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, T. and Taylor, M., 2007. You’re not welcome here: police move-on powers and discrimination law. UNSWLJ, 30, 151–173.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzer, R., and Tuch, S.A., 2002. Perceptions of racial profiling: race, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40 (2), 435–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesufu, S., 2013. Discriminatory use of police stop-and-search powers in London, UK. International journal of police science & management, 15 (4), 281–293.
   Google Scholar
• Zedner, L., 2007. Preventive justice or pre-punishment? The case of control orders. Current legal problems, 60 (1), 174–203.
   Google Scholar