Big Data applied to criminal investigations: expectations of professionals of police cooperation in the European Union

References

• Amorim, A., and Pinto, N., 2018. Big Data in forensic genetics. Forensic science international: genetics, 37, 102–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babuta, A., 2017. Big Data and policing: an assessment of law enforcement requirements, expectations and priorities. Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies for Defence and Security Studies, 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Babuta, A., and Oswald, M., 2020. Data analytics and algorithms in policing in England and Wales: towards a new policy framework. Royal United Services Institute or Defence and Security Studies, 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., Tuvblad, C., and Raine, A., 2010. Genetics and crime. In: E. McLaughlin, and T. Newburn, eds. The SAGE handbook of criminological theory. Sage Publications, 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursingplus open, 2, 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Betten, A.W., et al., 2018. Constructing future scenarios as a tool to foster responsible research and innovation among future synthetic biologists. Life sciences, society and policy, 14 (1), 1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borup, M., et al., 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology analysis & strategic management, 18 (3/4), 285–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayne, S., 2017. Big Data surveillance: the case of policing. American sociological review, 82 (5), 977–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S.D., 2009. Trading intelligence. Policing: A journal of policy and practice, 3 (2), 181–190.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and Michael, M., 2003. A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology analysis & strategic management, 15 (1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J.M., and Willis, S., 2020. Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016–2019. Forensic science international: synergy, 2, 352–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan, J., and Moses, L.B., 2015. Is Big Data challenging criminology? Theoretical criminology, 20 (1), 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J., and Moses, L.B., 2017. Making sense of Big Data for security. British journal of criminology, 57 (2), 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christin, A., 2016. From daguerreotypes to algorithms: machines, expertise, and three forms of objectivity. ACM SIGCAS computers and society, 46 (1), 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• DeLisi, M., 2012. Genetics: l’enfant terrible of criminology. Journal of criminal justice, 40, 515–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLisi, M., 2018. Forensic epidemiology: harnessing the power of public DNA sources to capture career criminals. Forensic science international, 291 (October), e20–e21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dencik, L., Hintz, A., and Carey, Z., 2018. Prediction, pre-emption and limits to dissent: social media and big data uses for policing protests in the United Kingdom. New media & society, 20 (4), 1433–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimeglio, C.E., et al., 2018. Expectations and boundaries for Big Data approaches in social medicine. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 57, 51–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drewer, D., and Miladinova, V., 2017. The Big Data challenge: impact and opportunity of large quantities of information under the Europol regulation. Computer law & security review, 33 (3), 298–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, R.V., and Shearing, C., 1986. The scientification of police work. In: G. Böhme, and N. Stehr, eds. The knowledge society. Dordrecht: D. Riedel, 129–159.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2016. Directive 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/680/oj [Accessed 25 may 2020].
   Google Scholar
• European Union Council, 2015. Implementations of the provisions on information exchange of the "Prüm decisions" – 5010/3/15. Brussels, BE: European Council. Available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5010-2015-REV-3/en/pdf [Accessed 16 december 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D., 2014. The trouble with brain imaging: hope, uncertainty and ambivalence in the neuroscience of autism. Biosocieties, 9 (3), 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fussey, P., and Sandhu, A., 2020. Surveillance arbitration in the era of digital policing. Theoretical criminology, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., Samuel, G., and Williams, C, 2015. Sociology of low expectations: recalibration as innovation work in biomedicine. Science, technology, & human values, 40 (6), 998–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M.E., 2017. The EU data protection reform and the challenges of Big Data: remaining uncertainties and ways forward. Information & communications technology law, 26 (2), 90–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herschel, R., and Miori, V.M., 2017. Ethics & Big Data. Technology in society, 49, 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hielscher, S., and Kivimaa, P., 2018. Governance through expectations: examining the long-term policy relevance of smart meters in the United Kingdom. Futures, 109, 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, M., Fielding, N., and Cope, N., 2005. "The appliance of science?”: the theory and practice of crime intelligence analysis. British journal of criminology, 45 (1), 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joh, E., 2014. Policing by numbers: Big Data and the fourth amendment. Washington law review, 89 (1), 35–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joh, E., 2016. The new surveillance discretion: automated suspicion. Big Data, and policing. Harvard law & policy review, 10, 15–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., 2014. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & society, 1 (1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., 2006. The social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technology analysis & strategic management, 18 (3–4), 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubler, K., 2017. State of urgency: surveillance, power, and algorithms in France’s state of emergency. Big Data & society, 4 (2), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, T., 2017. Big data in forensic science and medicine. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D., 2014. Surveillance, snowden, and Big Data: capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & society, 1 (2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, H., and Granja, R., 2018. Ethics in transnational forensic DNA data exchange in the EU: constructing boundaries and managing controversies. Science as culture, 27 (2), 242–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, H., and Granja, R., 2019a. Police epistemic culture and boundary work with judicial authorities and forensic scientists: the case of transnational DNA data exchange in the EU. New genetics and society, 38 (3), 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, H., and Granja, R., 2019b. Risks and benefits of transnational exchange of forensic DNA data in the EU: the views of professionals operating the Prüm system. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 68, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, H., Granja, R., and Amelung, N., 2020. Constructing suspicion through forensic DNA databases in the EU. The views of the Prüm professionals. The British journal of criminology, 60 (1), 141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M., and Matzner, X., 2019. Challenging algorithmic profiling: the limits of data protection and anti-discrimination in responding to emergent discrimination. Big data & society, 6 (2), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantelero, A., 2017. Regulating Big Data. The guidelines of the Council of Europe in the context of the European data protection framework. Computer law & security review, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marciani, G., et al., 2017. A data streaming approach to link mining in criminal networks. In: 2017 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW). IEEE, 138–143.
   Google Scholar
• Matzner, T., 2016. Beyond data as representation: the performativity of Big Data in surveillance. Surveillance & society, 14 (2), 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, Y., 2017. Conceptualising the right to data protection in an era of Big data. Big Data & society, 4 (1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miró-Llinares, F., 2020. Predictive policing: utopia or dystopia? On attitudes towards the use of Big Data algorithms for law enforcement. SOC ARXIV, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, L.B., and Chan, J., 2016. Algorithmic prediction in policing: assumptions, evaluation, and accountability. Policing and society, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray. T, 2019. Nearly twenty years on: the Canadian police executive community revisited. Policing: A Journal of Policy and practice, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyroud, P., and Disley, E., 2008. Technology and policing: implications for fairness and legitimacy. Policing: A journal of policy and practice, 2 (2), 226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics, . 2007. . The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues. London. Available at: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/The-forensic-use-of-bioinformation-ethical-issues.pdf [Accessed 7 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, M., and Babuta, A., 2019. Data analytics and algorithmic bias in policing. technical report. London: Royal United Services Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pickersgill, M., 2011. “Promising” therapies: neuroscience, clinical practice, and the treatment of psychopathy. Sociology of health and illness, 33 (3), 448–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieri, E., 2009. Sociology of expectation and the e-social science agenda. Information, communication & society, 12 (7), 1103–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaksiy, K., Nikiforov, A., and Miloslavskaya, N., 2018. Applying Big Data technologies to detect cases of money laundering and counter financing of terrorism. In: Awan, I., Younas,M., Portela, F, eds 6th IEEE International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops, 6-8 August 2018 Barcelona, Spain. Conference Publisher Services, 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Pramanik, M.I., et al., 2017. Big Data analytics for security and criminal investigations. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Data mining and knowledge discovery, 7 (4), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, R., Schultz, J., and Crawford, K., 2019. Dirty data, bad predictions: how civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice. New York univeristy law, 94 (15), 15–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, G., 2018. Policing in the era of Big data. Annual review of criminology, 1 (1), 401–419.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., 2000. Government and control. British journal of criminology, 40 (2), 321–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, G., et al., 2018. A response to the forensic genetics policy initiative's report "establishing best practice for forensic DNA databases". Forensic science international: genetics, 36, e19–e21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, C., Christensen, T., and Weston, C., 2015. Constructing crime in a database: Big Data and the mangle of social problems work. Qualitative sociology review, 11 (2), 180–195.
   Google Scholar
• Sandhu, A., and Fussey, P., 2021. The 'uberization of policing'? How police negotiate and operationalise predictive policing technology. Policing and society, 31 (1), 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A., 2019. Predictive policing for reform? indeterminacy and intervention in Big Data policing. Surveillance & society, 17 (3/4), 456–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.W., 2013. The rise of evidence-based policing: targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime and justice, 42 (1), 377–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starks, H., and Brown Trinidad, S., 2007. Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative health research, 17 (10), 1372–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M., Wehrens, R., and de Bont, A., 2018. Conceptualizations of Big Data and their epistemological claims in healthcare: a discourse analysis. Big Data & society, 5 (2), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toom, V., Granja, R., and Ludwig, A., 2019. The Prüm decisions as an aspirational regime: reviewing a decade of cross-border exchange and comparison of forensic DNA data. Forensic science international: genetics, 41, 50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutton, R., 2011. Promising pessimism: reading the futures to be avoided in biotech. Social studies of science, 41 (3), 411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, A., and Beaver, K.M., 2009. Biosocial criminology: new directions in theory and research. In: A. Walsh, and K Beaver, eds. Ashgate research companion to biosocial theories of crime. New York and London: Routledge, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wienroth, M., Morling, N., and Williams, R., 2014. Technological innovations in forensic genetics: social, legal and ethical aspects. Recent advances in DNA & gene sequences, 8 (2), 98–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, R., and Johnson, P., 2004. “Wonderment and dread”: representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases. New genetics and society, 23 (2), 205–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., and Wienroth, M., 2017. Social and ethical aspects of forensic genetics: a critical review. Forensic science review, 29 (2), 145–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wout, X., et al., 2021. Machine learning for policing: a case study on arrests in Chile. Policing and society, 31 (9), 1036–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., 2016. Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research. Journal of law and the biosciences, (October), 611–635.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar