Independence and impact: a typology of researcher-user relationships for policing and crime prevention

References

• Bacon, M., et al., 2021. Fragile alliances: culture, funding and sustainability in police-academic partnerships. Evidence and policy, 17 (1), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., Shaw, B., and Boaz, A., 2011. Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy. Research evaluation, 20 (3), 227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., and Nixon, C., 2009. Ending the ‘dialogue of the deaf’: evidence and policing policies and practices. An Australian case study. Police practice and research, 10 (5-6), 423–435.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, A., et al., 2001. Problem-oriented policing, deterrence and youth violence: an evaluation of Boston’s operation ceasefire. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 38 (3), 195–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, A.A., 2016. The value of ‘pracademics’ in enhancing crime analysis in police departments. Policing, 10 (3), 308–314.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, A.A., 2020. Youth gang gun violence in Boston, Massachusetts. In: M.S. Scott, and R.V. Clarke, eds. problem-oriented policing: successful case studies. London: Routledge, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, A.A., and Davis, E.F., 2014. Implementing science in police agencies: the embedded research model. Policing, 8 (4), 294–306.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., 2015. Tip-toeing through the credibility mine field: gaining social acceptance in policing research. In: E. Cockbain, and J. Knutsson, eds. Applied police research: challenges and opportunities. London: Routledge, 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N., 2011. Reflections from the periphery. British journal of criminology, 51, 707–710.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R.V., and Goldstein, H., 2003a. Reducing theft at construction sites: lessons from a problem-oriented project. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R.V., and Goldstein, H., 2003b. Thefts from cars in center-city parking facilities: a case study in implementing problem-oriented policing. Crime prevention studies, 15, 257–298.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R.V., and Hough, M., 1984. Crime and police effectiveness. home office research study 79. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cockbain, E., 2015. Getting a foot in the closed door: practical advice for starting out in research into crime and policing issues. In: E. Cockbain, and J. Knutsson, eds. Applied police research: challenges and opportunities. London: Routledge, 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Colley, H., 2014. What (a) to do about ‘impact’: a Bourdieusian critique. British educational research journal, 40 (4), 660–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, S.K., and Meijer, I., 2021. Towards evaluating the research impact made by universities of applied sciences. Science and public policy, 48 (2), 226–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, A., 2017. Research co-production and knowledge mobilisation in policing. In: J. Knutsson, and L. Thompson, eds. Advances in evidence-based policing. Abingdon: Routledge, 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, A., 2020a. Societal impact as ‘rituals of verification’ and the co-production of knowledge. British journal of criminology, 60, 493–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, A., 2020b. Effecting change in policing through police/academic partnerships: the challenges of (and for) co-production. In: N. Fielding, K. Bullock, and S. Holdaway, eds. Critical reflections on evidence-based policing. Abingdon: Routledge, 175–198.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, E., 2011. Thinking about criminology. British journal of criminology, 51, 710–713.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., 2018. Tackling domestic abuse locally: paradigms, ideologies and the political tensions of multi-agency working. Journal of gender-based violence, 2 (3), 429–446.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., 2021. Practising co-produced research: tackling domestic abuse through innovative multi-agency partnership working. Crime prevention and community safety, 23, 233–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., and Williams, E., 2009. Reflections from a police research unit: an inside job. Policing, 3 (4), 373–380.
   Google Scholar
• Eck, J.E., and Spelman, W., 1987. Problem-solving: problem-oriented policing in newport news. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, G., et al., 2000. RV snapshot: UK policing and repeat victimisation. Crime reduction research series paper 5. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, G., and Pease, K., 1993. Once bitten, twice bitten: repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention. Crime prevention unit series paper, 46. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, D., et al., 1990. The Kirkholt burglary prevention project: phase II. Crime prevention unit paper 23. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, N., and Richardson, N., 2018. Police reform, research and the uses of ‘expert knowledge’. European journal of policing studies, 5 (3), 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., 1984. White law: racism in the police, courts and prisons. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., and Malterud, K., 2018. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic overnarrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48, e12931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., et al., 2016a. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study’. The Milbank quarterly, 94 (2), 392–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., et al., 2016b. Research impact: A narrative review. BMC medicine, 14, 78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groombridge, N., 2011. Ian loader and richard sparks, public criminology? Punishment and society, 13 (4), 494–496.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette, R.T., Lee-Silcox, J., and Przeszlowski, K., 2019. From research partner to embedded criminologist: a synthesized taxonomy and reflections from the field. Policing, 15 (2), 770–783.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., et al., 1978. Policing the crisis: mugging, the state and law and order. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersson, S., 2015. An inside job: managing mismatched expectations and unwanted findings when conducting police research as a police officer. In: E. Cockbain, and J. Knutsson, eds. Applied police research: challenges and opportunities. London: Routledge, 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, T., 2008. A firing squad to shoot the messenger: home office peer review of research. In: T. Hope, and R. Walters, eds. Critical thinking about the uses of research. London: Centre of Crime and Justice Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, T., 2011. Official criminology and the new crime sciences. In: M. Bosworth, and C. Hoyle, eds. What is criminology? Oxford: Oxford University Press Online, 456-474.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., 2014. Confessions of a recovering ‘administrative criminologist’: jock young, quantitative research and policy research. Crime media culture, 10 (3), 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, M., Davies, B., and McDermott, M., 2019. How co-productive regulates. Social and legal studies, 28 (3), 370–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D.M., 2020. Domestic violence in high point, north carolina. In: M. S. Scott, and R. V. Clarke, eds. Problem-oriented policing: successful case studies. London: Routledge, 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D., 2015. Working in the field: police research in theory and practice. In: E. Cockbain, and J. Knutsson, eds. Applied police research: challenges and opportunities. London: Routledge, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsson, J., 2015. Politics, promises and problems: the rise and fall of the Swedish police evaluation unit. In: E. Cockbain, and J. Knutsson, eds. Applied police research: challenges and opportunities. London: Routledge, 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsson, J., and Tompson, L., 2017. Introduction. In: J. Knutsson, and L. Tompson, eds. Advances in evidence-based policing. London: Routledge, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, K., Mazzoli Smith, L., and Todd, L., 2018. The impact agenda and critical social research in education: hitting the target but missing the spot? Policy futures in education, 16 (2), 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laycock, G., 2011. Public criminology? British journal of criminology, 51, 720–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, J., and Young, J., 1984. What is to be done about law and order? crisis in the eighties. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, J., 2015. Jock young and the development of left realist criminology. Critical criminology, 23, 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, I., and Sparks, R., 2010. Public criminology? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lumsden, K., 2017. The shifting legitimacy of knowledge across academic and police / practitioner settings: highlight the risks and limits of reflexivity. In: S. Armstrong, J. Blaustein, and A Henry, eds. Reflexivity and criminal justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 191–213.
   Google Scholar
• Lumsden, K., and Goode, J., 2018. Public criminology, reflexivity and the enterprise university: experiences of research, knowledge transfer work and co-option with police forces. Theoretical criminology, 22 (2), 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, R., 2008. Prostitution, politics and policy. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, P., 2016. In defence of administrative criminology. Crime science, 5, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, P., et al., 1976. Crime as opportunity. Home office research study no. 34. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• McAra, L., 2017. Can criminologists change the world? critical reflections on the politics, performance and effects of criminal justice. British journal of criminology, 57, 767–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar, A., et al., 2016. Using win-win strategies to implement health in all policies: a cross-case analysis. PLOS one, 2, ), e0147003.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R., 2011. Public criminology? British journal of criminology, 51, 716–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R., and Hough, M., 2007. The politics of criminological research. In: R. King, and E. Wincup, eds. Doing research on crime and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 45–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, S.P., et al., 2010. Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups. Health research policy and systems, 8, 30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhonen, R., Benneworth, P., and Olmos-Peñuela, J., 2020. From productive interactions to impact pathways: understanding the key dimensions in developing SSH research societal impact. Research evaluation, 29 (1), 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, K., 2017. Why have we funded this research?’: on politics, research and newsmaking criminology. Criminology and criminal justice, 17 (5), 507–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M., 2003. Mode 2 revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L.A., et al., 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42 (5), 533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., et al., 2005. Realist review: a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of health services research and policy, 10 (S1), 21–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pease, K., 1998. Repeat victimisation: taking stock, crime detection and prevention series paper 90. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., 2008. Influencing public policy: an embedded criminologist reflects on California prison reform. Journal of experimental criminology, 4, 335–356.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, P., 2014. The public faces of public criminology. Criminology and criminal justice, 14 (4), 412–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojek, J., Smith, H.P., and Alpert, G.P., 2012. The prevalence and characteristics of police practitioner–researcher partnerships. Police quarterly, 15 (3), 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R., Eck, J.E., and Dunham, J., 2010. Super controllers and crime prevention: a routine activity explanation of crime prevention success and failure. Security journal, 23 (1), 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., et al., 2019. Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environmental science and policy, 102, 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M., and Clarke, R.V., 2020. Problem-oriented policing: successful case studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L., 2022. The Cambridge police executive programme: A global reach for pracademics. In: E. Piza, and B. Welsh, eds. The globalisation of evidence-based policing. London: Routledge, 295–317.
   Google Scholar
• Sidebottom, A., and Tilley, N., 2011. Improving problem-oriented policing: the need for a new model? Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 13, 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Spaagen, J., and van Drooge, L., 2011. Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research evaluation, 20 (3), 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., 1981. Multiple victimization: evidence, theory and future research. The journal of criminal law and criminology, 72 (2), 762–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., Genn, H., and Dodd, D., 1977. Surveying victims: a study of the measurement of criminal victimization. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stanko, B.A., 2007. From academia to policy making: changing police responses to violence against women. Theoretical criminology, 11, 209–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanko, E., 1985. Intimate intrusions: women’s experiences of male violence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M., 2010. Public criminology’ and evidence-based policy. Criminology and public policy, 9 (4), 783–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, R., 2008. Government manipulation of criminological knowledge and policies of deceit. In: T. Hope, and R. Walters, eds. Critical thinking about the uses of research. London: Centre of Crime and Justice Studies
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1949. The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K., 2020. Playing the fields: theorizing research impact and its assessment. Research evaluation, 29 (2), 191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J., 1992. Ten points of realism. In: J. Young, and R. Matthews, eds. Rethinking criminology: the realist debate. London: Sage, 24–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ziman, J., 2000. Real science: what it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar