‘A genuine one usually sticks out a mile’: policing coercive control in England and Wales

References

• Barlow, C., et al., 2020. Putting coercive control into practice: problems and possibilities. British journal of criminology, 60, 160–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, C., and Whittle, M., 2019. Policing coercive control: project report. Lancaster: Lancaster University Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, A., 2017. Greater than the mere sum of its parts: coercive control and the question of proof. Child and family law quarterly, 29 (4), 379–400.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson, V., 2020. A comparative evaluation of offences: criminalising abusive behaviour in England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland and Tasmania. In: M McMahon, and P McGorrery, eds. Criminalising coercive control. Singapore: Springer International, 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson, V., and Bishop, C., 2015. Is the creation of a discrete offence of coercive control necessary to combat domestic violence? Northern Ireland legal quarterly, 66 (2), 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C., and Bettinson, V., 2018. Evidencing domestic violence, including behaviour that falls under the new offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’. The international journal of evidence and proof, 22 (1), 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, I., et al., 2019. Service provider difficulties in operationalizing coercive control. Violence against women, 25 (6), 635–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, I., et al., 2021. Policing a new domestic abuse crime: effects of force-wide training on arrests for coercive control. Policing and society, 31 (10), 1153–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, I., and Myhill, A., 2022. Coercive control: patterns in crimes, arrest and outcomes for a new domestic abuse offence. The British journal of criminology, 62 (2), 468–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman, M., and Brooks-Hay, O., 2018. Aligning policy and law? The creation of a domestic abuse offence incorporating coercive control. Criminology and criminal justice, 18 (1), 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2014. Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N., 1986. The ideal victim. In: E Fattah, ed. From crime policy to victim policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C., 2020. Are you crewed up with that bird from the Uni? The complexities of conducting ethnographic research in policing. Journal of organizational ethnography, 9 (3), 365–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crang, M., and Cook, I., 2007. Doing ethnographies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dobash, R., and Dobash, R., 1979. Violence against wives. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R., Fretz, R., and Shaw, L., 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjimatheou, K., and Grace, J., 2021. No black and white answer about how far we can go: police decision making under the domestic violence disclosure scheme. Policing and society, 31 (7), 834–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., 2020. The coercive control offence: a case study on overcriminalisation. In: M Chmieliński, and M Rupniewski, eds. The philosophy of legal change: theoretical perspectives and practical processes. Abingdon: Routledge, 200–217.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC, 2014. Everyone’s business: improving the police response to domestic abuse. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC/HMCPSI, 2017. Living in fear – the police and CPS response to harassment and stalking. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary & Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate.
   Google Scholar
• Hohl, K., and Stanko, E., 2015. Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European journal of criminology, 12 (3), 324–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2014a. Strengthening the law on domestic abuse – a consultation. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2014b. Strengthening the law on domestic abuse consultation – summary of responses. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2015. Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship: statutory guidance framework. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2019. Police workforce, England and Wales, 31 March 2019. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2021. Review of the controlling or coercive behaviour offence. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M., 2003. Street phenomenology: the go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4 (3), 455–485.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, B., 2009. Police culture in a changing world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGorrery, P., and McMahon, M., 2021. Prosecuting controlling or coercive behaviour in England and Wales: media reports of a novel offence. Criminology and criminal justice, 21 (4), 566–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton Nicholls, C., Mills, L., and Kotecha, M., 2014. Observation. In: J Ritchie, ed. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 243–268.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2020. Domestic abuse and the criminal justice system, England and Wales: November 2020. London: Office for National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Okun, L., 1986. Woman abuse: facts replacing myths. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, T., 2020. Failing to see the wood for the trees: chronic sexual violation and criminal law. The journal of criminal law, 84 (6), 573–595.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., Myhill, A., and Wire, J., 2018. Practitioner (mis) understandings of coercive control in England and Wales. Criminology and criminal justice, 18 (1), 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., 2007. Tripping over molehills: ethics and the ethnography of police work. International journal of social research methodology, 10 (1), 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E., 2007. Coercive control: how men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E., 2012. Looking beyond domestic violence: policing coercive control. Journal of police crisis negotiations, 12, 199–217.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E., 2017. Coercive control as a framework for responding to male partner abuse in the UK: opportunities and challenges. In: J Lombard, ed. The Routledge handbook of gender and violence. Abingdon: Routledge, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E., 2020. The ‘coercive control framework’: making law work for women. In: M McMahon, and P McGorrery, eds. Criminalising coercive control. Singapore: Springer International, 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tolmie, J., 2018. Coercive control: to criminalise or not to criminalise? Criminology and criminal justice, 18 (1), 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuerkheimer, D., 2004. Recognising and remedying the harm of battering: a call to criminalise domestic violence. Journal of criminal law and criminology, 94 (4), 959–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S., and Fitz-Gibbon, K., 2019. The criminalisation of coercive control: the power of law? International journal for crime, justice and social democracy, 8 (4), 94–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S., Fitz-Gibbon, K., and McCulloch, J., 2018. Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through the reform of legal categories. Criminology and criminal justice, 18 (1), 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, S., 2015. Focused ethnography: a methodological adaptation for social research in emerging contexts. Forum: qualitative social research, 16, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wangmann, J., 2020. Coercive control as the context for intimate partner violence: the challenge for the legal system. In: M McMahon, and P McGorrery, eds. Criminalising coercive control. Singapore: Springer International, 219–242.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, C., 2017. Seeing what is ‘invisible in plain sight’: policing coercive control. The Howard journal of crime and justice, 56 (4), 500–515.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, C., 2020. From social construct to legal innovation: The offence of controlling or coercive behaviour in England and Wales. In: M McMahon, and P McGorrery, eds. Criminalising coercive control. Singapore: Springer International, 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Westera, N., Kebbell, M., and Milne, B., 2016. Want a better criminal justice response to rape? Improve police interviews with complainants and suspects. Violence against women, 22 (14), 1748–1769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, J., 2015. Domestic violence and the criminal law: reconceptualising reform. The journal of criminal law, 79 (1), 55–70.
   Google Scholar