It's all about time: the influence of behaviour and timelines on suspect disclosure during investigative interviews

References

• Abbe, A., and Brandon, S.E., 2013. The role of rapport in investigative interviewing: a review. Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling, 10 (3), 237–249. DOI: 10.1002/jip.1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams-Quackenbush, N.M. 2019. The influence of guilt presumptive language on investigative interview outcomes. Doctoral Thesis, Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Aebi, M., et al., 2014. Criminal history and future offending of juveniles convicted of the possession of child pornography. Sexual abuse: a journal of research and treatment, 26 (4), 375–390. DOI: 10.1177/1079063213492344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H and Gottfredson, R K, 2010. Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression. Journal of organizational behavior, 31 (6), 776–786. DOI: 10.1002/job.686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L S, West, S G and Reno, R R, 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. United States: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K.M., et al., 2011. The characteristics of online sex offenders: a meta-analysis. Sexual abuse, 23 (1), 92–123. DOI: 10.1177/1079063210370708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K.M., Hanson, R.K., and VanZuylen, H., 2015. Online child pornography offenders are different: a meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of sexual behavior, 44 (1), 45–66. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Eck, B and Bull, R, 2022. Effects of empathy and question types on suspects’ provision of information in investigative interviews. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/14613557221106073.
   Google Scholar
• Baker-Eck, B, Bull, R and Walsh, D, 2021. Investigative empathy: Five types of cognitive empathy in a field study of investigative interviews with suspects of sexual offences. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 11, 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, B.L., et al., 2018. Police recording of custodial interrogations: a state-by-state legal inquiry. International journal of police science & management, 20 (1), 3–18. DOI:10.1177/1461355717750172.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, E., Deslauriers-Varin, N., and St-Yves, M., 2010. Interactions between factors related to the decision of sex offenders to confess during police interrogation: a classification-tree approach. Annals of Sex research, 22 (3), 343–367. DOI: 10.1177/1079063210370707.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C., 2004. Rationality and game theory. In: A. Mele, and R. & Rawling, eds. The Oxford handbook of rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 182–205.
   Google Scholar
• Brent Jr, E.E., and Sykes, R.E., 1979. A mathematical model of symbolic interaction between police and suspects. Behavioral science, 24 (6), 388–402. DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830240605.
   Google Scholar
• Brimbal, L., and Luke, T.J. 2019. Deconstructing the evidence: the effects of strength and reliability of evidence on suspect behavior and counter-interrogation tactics. The article has been retrieved at: file:///Users/andreanne/Downloads/Deconstructing%20the%20evidence%20BLIND%20(2).pdf. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/vrs7z.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R, 2014. When in interviews to disclose information to suspects and to challenge them?. In: R Bull, ed. Investigative Interviewing. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R and Rachlew, A, 2020. Investigative interviewing: From England to Norway and beyond. In: S Barela, M Fallon, and J Ohlin, eds. Interrogation and torture: Research on efficacy, and its integration with morality and legality. United-States: Oxford University Press, 171–196.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R., and Soukara, S., 2010. Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In: G. D. Lassiter, and C. A. Meissner, eds. Police interrogations and false confessions: current research, practice, and policy recommendations. United States: American Psychological Association, 81–95. DOI: 10.1037/12085-005.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., Milne, R., and Bull, R., 2011. Interviewing suspects of crime: the impact of PEACE training, supervision and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling, 8 (2), 149–162. DOI: 10.1002/jip.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, H and Bull, R, 2021. Contextual factors predict self-reported confession decisionmaking: A field study of suspects’ actual police interrogation experiences. Law and Human Behavior, 45 (4), 310–323. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, F., Knieps, M., and Tekin, S., 2020. Untapped potential? A survey study with German police officers into suspect interviewing practices and the strategic use of evidence. Journal of forensic psychology research and practice, 20 (1), 53–79. DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2019.1684123.
   Google Scholar
• Clevenger, S.L., Navarro, J.N., and Jasinski, J.L., 2016. A matter of Low self-control? exploring differences between child pornography possessors and child pornography producers/distributers using self-control theory. Sexual abuse: a journal of research and treatment, 28 (6), 555–571. DOI: 10.1177/1079063214557173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K., and Carthy, N., 2019. No rapport, no comment: the relationship between rapport and communication during investigative interviews with suspects. Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling, 16 (1), 18–31. DOI: 10.1002/jip.1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, D., and Clarke, R., 1986. The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. United States: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Demidenko, E., 2004. Mixed models: theory and applications. 1st ed. United States: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers-Varin, N., 2020. Facteurs explicatifs de la confession en contexte d’interrogatoire policier: une analyse d’arbres décisionnels. Criminologie, 53 (2), 219–254. DOI: 10.7202/1074194ar.
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers-Varin, N, 2022. Confession during Police Interrogation: A Decision Tree Analysis. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37, 526–539. DOI: 10.1007/s11896-022-09507-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers-Varin, N., Beauregard, E., and Wong, J., 2011. Changing their mind about confessing to police: the role of contextual factors in crime confession. Police quarterly, 14 (1), 5–24. DOI: 10.1177/1098611110392721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers-Varin, N., and Bergeron, A., 2021. Suspect interviews and confessions in Sex crime cases. In: C. Bennel, and N Deslauriers-Varin, eds. Criminal investigations of sexual offenses. United States: Spinger, 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, E., et al., 2015. Child pornography possessors and child contact Sex offenders: a multilevel comparison of demographic characteristics and rates of recidivism. Sexual abuse: a journal of research and treatment, 27 (5), 460–478. DOI: 10.1177/1079063214521469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, W.P., 2016. Applied game theory to improve strategic and tactical military decisions. Journal of defense management, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1969. Strategic interaction. United States: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, P.A., et al., 2013. Counter-interrogation strategies among small cells of suspects. Psychiatry, psychology and Law, 20 (5), 705–712. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2012.729021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G.H., 2003. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: a handbook. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G.H., and Petursson, H., 1991. Custodial interrogation: why do suspects confess and how does it relate to their crime, attitude and personality? Personality and individual differences, 12 (3), 295–306. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90116-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G.H., and Sigurdsson, J.F., 2000. Differences and similarities between violent offenders and sex offenders. Child abuse and neglect, 24, 363–372. DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00150-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, C. 2019. Do suspects use the counter-interrogation strategies they say they use?. Master Thesis. University Of Gothenburg Institution of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., and Luke, T., 2014. Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: the state of the science. Credibility assessment, 1–36. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394433-7.00001-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hewes, D.E. 1975. Statistical tests for Markov chains. Markov Chain Tutorial, International Communication Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, U., and Christianson, S., 2002. Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral sciences and the Law, 20, 31–45. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S.M., et al., 2007. Police interviewing and interrogation: a self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and human behavior, 31 (4), 381–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M., et al., 2010. How do sex offenders think the police should interview to elicit confessions from sex offenders? Psychology, crime & law, 16 (7), 567–584. DOI: 10.1080/10683160902971055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., 2003. Decision making using Game Theory. England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C.E., et al., 2013. A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, public policy, and law, 19 (2), 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C E, Miller, J C and Redlich, A D, 2016. The dynamic nature of interrogation. Law and human behavior, 40 (3), 295–309. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C E, Russano, M B, Miller, J C and Redlich, A D, 2019. On the road (to admission): Engaging suspects with minimization. Public Policy, and Law, 25 (3), 166–180. DOI: 10.1037/law0000199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C.E., and Valencia, E.J., 2021. You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly. International journal of police science & management, 23 (1), 42–54. DOI: 10.1177/1461355720955077.
   Google Scholar
• King, L., and Snook, B., 2009. Peering inside a Canadian interrogation room: an examination of the reid model of interrogation, influence tactics, and coercive strategies. Criminal justice and behavior, 36 (7), 674–694. DOI: 10.1177/0093854809335142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy-Harland, S., and Bull, R., 2017. Police strategies and suspect responses in real-life serious crime interviews. Journal of police and criminal psychology, 32, 138–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leik, R.K., and Meeker, B.F., 1975. Mathematical sociology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H and Barry, J, 2012. Interpreting interactions in logistic regression. Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit Report.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, T., et al., 2010. Suspect confession of child sexual abuse to investigators. Child maltreatment, 15 (2), 161–170. DOI: 10.1177/1077559509360251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, T.J., et al., 2014. How awareness of possible evidence induces forthcoming counter-interrogation strategies. Applied cognitive psychology, 28 (6), 876–882. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, T.J., et al., 2016. Countermeasures against the à strategic use of evidence technique: effects on suspects’ strategies. Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling, 13 (2), 131–147. DOI: 10.1002/jip.1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, T.J., and Granhag, P.A., 2020. The Shift-of-Strategy (SoS) approach: using evidence strategically to influence suspects’ counter-interrogation strategies. Psychology crime & Law, 1–26. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madon, S., et al., 2013. How factors present during the immediate interrogation situation produce short-sighted confession decisions. Law and human behavior, 37 (1), 60–74. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaletta, P.R., et al., 2014. Exploring clinical and personality characteristics of adult male internet-only child pornography offenders. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 58 (2), 137–153. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X12465271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, R.W., et al., 1982. A stochastic model of relational control in dyadic interaction. American sociological review, 47 (1), 62–75. DOI: 10.2307/2095042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, L., Granhag, P.A., and Tekin, S., 2017. Interviewing suspects in denial: on how different evidence disclosure modes affect the elicitation of new critical information. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C.A., et al., 2017. Developing an evidence-based perspective on interrogation: a review of the US government’s high-value detainee interrogation group research program. Psychology, public policy, and Law, 23 (4), 438–457. DOI: 10.1037/law0000136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B., 1983. Confessions and police interrogation of suspects. Criminal law review, September, 596–604.
   Google Scholar
• Moston, S., and Engelberg, T., 2011. The effects of evidence on the outcome of interviews with criminal suspects. Police practice and research, 12 (6), 518–526. DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2011.563963.
   Google Scholar
• Moston, S.J., Stephenson, G.M., and Williamson, T.M., 1992. The effects of case characteristics on suspect behavior during police questioning. British journal of criminology, 32, 23–40. DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleszkiewicz, S, Granhag, P A and Kleinman, S M, 2017. Eliciting information from human sources: Training handlers in the Scharff technique. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22 (2), 400–419. DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleszkiewicz, S, Granhag, P A and Kleinman, S M, 2017. Gathering human intelligence via repeated interviewing: Further empirical tests of the Scharff technique. Psychology, Crime and Law, 23 (7), 666–681. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1296150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G., and Ost, J., 2011. The use and efficacy of empathy in police interviews with suspects of sexual offences. Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling, 8 (2), 178–188. DOI:10.1002/jip.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G., Ost, J., and Cherryman, J., 2010. Police interviews with suspected child sex offenders: does use of empathy and question type influence the amount of investigation relevant information obtained? Psychology, crime & Law, 18 (3), 259–273. DOI:10.1080/1068316x.2010.481624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearse, J., and Gudjonsson, G., 1999. Measuring influential police interviewing tactics: a factor analytical approach. Legal and criminology psychology, 4, 221–238. DOI:10.1348/135532599167860.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., and Brown, D., 1998. Entry into the criminal justice system: a survey of police arrests and their outcomes. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson, J F and Gudjonsson, G H, 1994. Alcohol and drug intoxication during police interrogation and the reasons why suspects confess to the police. Addiction, 89, 985–997. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03358.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smid, W., et al., 2015. Prioritizing child pornography notifications: predicting direct victimization. Sexual abuse, 27 (4), 398–413. DOI: 10.1177/1079063213514453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook, B., et al., 2020. Urgent issues and prospects in reforming interrogation practices in the United States and Canada. Legal and criminological psychology, 26 (1), 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook, B., Brooks, D., and Bull, R., 2015. A lesson on interrogations from detainees: predicting self-reported confessions and cooperation. Criminal justice and behavior, 42 (12), 1243–1260. DOI: 10.1177/0093854815604179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorochinski, M., et al., 2014. Interviewing to detect deception: when to disclose the evidence? Journal of police and criminal psychology, 29 (2), 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• St-Yves, M., 2002. Interrogatoire de police et crime sexuel: profil du suspect collaborateur. Revue internationales de criminologie & de police technique & scientifique, 1, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• St-Yves, M., 2004. Les facteurs associés à la confession: la recherche empirique. In: M. St-Yves, and J Landry, eds. Psychologie des entrevues d’enquête, de la recherche à la pratique. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• St-Yves, M and Kebbell, M, 2018. Investigative interviewing in suspected sexual homicides. Routledge international handbook of sexual homicide studies, 562–573.
   Google Scholar
• St-Yves, M., and Meissner, C.A., 2014. Interviewing suspects. In: M. St-Yves, ed. Investigative interviewing: the essentials. Carswell: Edition Yvon Blais, 145–190.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin, S., et al., 2016. How to make perpetrators in denial disclose more information about their crimes. Psychology, crime & law, 22 (6), 561–580. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1168425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin S., G., et al., 2015. Interviewing strategically to elicit admissions from guilty suspects. Law and human behavior, 39 (3), 244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, W.J., 2018. The complex relationship between interrogation techniques, suspects changing their statement and legal assistance. Evidence from a Dutch sample of police interviews. Policing and society, 28 (3), 308–327. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2016.1157594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J.L., Klaver, J., and Roesch, R., 2005. Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and human behavior, 29 (3), 253–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., and Granhag, P.A., 2012. Eliciting cues to deception and truth: what matters are the questions asked. Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 1 (2), 110–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachi, T., et al., 2014. Police interviewing styles and confessions in Japan. Psychology, crime & Law, 20 (7), 673–694. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.854791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D., and Bull, R., 2012. How do interviewers attempt to overcome suspects’ denials? Psychiatry, psychology and Law, 19 (2), 151–168. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2010.543756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D., and Bull, R., 2015. Interviewing suspects: examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, crime & Law, 21 (7), 661–680. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westera, N.J., and Kebbell, M.R., 2014. Investigative interviewing in suspected sex offences. In: R Bull, ed. investigative interviewing. New York: Springer, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Madon, S., and Guyll, M., 2015. Short-Sighted confession decisions: the role of uncertain and delayed consequences. Law and human behavior, 39 (1), 44–52. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F, Huang, C Y and Bull, R, 2021. Police interview of suspects in China: Developments and analyses. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 23 (1), 29–41. DOI: 10.1177/1461355720947548.
   Google Scholar