Public support for empowering police during the COVID-19 crisis: evidence from London

References

• Alhakami, A.S., and Slovic, P., 1994. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk analysis, 14 (6), 1085–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, S., Brown, J., and Ferguson, D. 2021. Coronavirus: lockdown laws. Available from: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8875/CBP-8875.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, C.F., and Schaffer, M.E. 2013. ACTEST: stata module to perform Cumby-Huizinga general test for autocorrelation in time series. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457668.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, B., Reiner, R., and Sheptycki, J., 2019. The politics of the police (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., et al., 2020. Live facial recognition: trust and legitimacy as predictors of public support for police use of new technology. British journal of criminology, 606, 1502–1522.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., Milani, J., and Jackson, J., 2017. Identity, legitimacy and “making sense” of police use of force. Policing: an international journal of police strategies & management, 40 (3), 614–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman, S., et al., 2023. ‘Giving the right service to different people’: revisiting police legitimacy in the COVID-19 era. Policing & society, 33 (3), 348–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, J., and Skidmore, M. 2020. Policing the pandemic: public attitudes to police visibility, enforcement and fairness. Available from: http://www.police-foundation.org.uk/2020/10/long-read-policing-the-pandemic-public-attitudes-to-police-visibility-enforcement-and-fairness/.
   Google Scholar
• College of Policing. 2020. Engage, explain, encourage, enforce - applying the four ‘E’s. Available from: https://www.college.police.uk/What-we-do/COVID-19/Documents/Engage-Explain-Encourage-Enforce-guidance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, M.S., et al., 2017. Community perceptions of police body-worn cameras: the impact of views on fairness, fear, performance, and privacy. Criminal justice and behaviour, 44 (4), 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, M., Bender, M. and Ombao, H, 2017. A robust interrupted time series model for analyzing complex health care intervention data. Statistics in Medicine, 36 (29), 4660–4676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desroches, C., and Caluori, J. 2020. COVID-19 and the criminal justice system. Available from: https://www.crestadvisory.com/post/covid-19-and-the-criminal-justice-system.
   Google Scholar
• Factor, R., Castilo, J.C., and Rattner, A., 2014. Procedural justice, minorities, and religiosity. Police practice and research, 15 (2), 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M.L., et al., 2000. The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits. Journal of behavioral decision making, 13, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B., et al., 2020. Are the effects of legitimacy and its components invariant? Operationalization and the generality of Sunshine and Tyler’s empowerment hypothesis. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 58 (1), 3–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M.M., and Jackson, J., 2017. Justifying violence: legitimacy, ideology and public support for police use of force. Psychology, crime & Law, 23 (1), 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemmaghami, A., et al., 2021. Responding to the public during a pandemic: perceptions of ‘satisfactory’and ‘unsatisfactory’policing. Policing: a journal of policy and practice, 15 (4), 2310–2328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heen, M.S., Lieberman, J.D., and Miethe, T.D., 2017. The thin blue line meets the big blue sky: perceptions of police legitimacy and public attitudes towards aerial drones. Criminal justice studies: a critical journal of crime, Law and society, 31 (1), 18–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, Z., et al., 2023. Artificial fairness? Trust in algorithmic police decision-making. Journal of experimental criminology, 19, 165–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNL. 2020. COVID-19 Civid Freedom Tracker. Available from: https://www.icnl.org/covid19tracker/?location = &issue = 9&date = &type = .
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2006. Introducing fear of crime to risk research. Risk analysis: an international journal, 26 (1), 253–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., et al., 2012. Just authority?: trust in the police in England and Wales. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., et al., 2013. Monopolizing force? Police legitimacy and public attitudes toward the acceptability of violence. Psychology, public policy, and Law, 19 (4), 479–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2018. Norms, normativity, and the legitimacy of justice institutions: international perspectives. Annual review of Law and social science, 14, 145–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., et al. 2020. The lockdown and social norms: Why the UK is complying by consent rather than compulsion. Available from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/lockdown-social-norms/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., et al., 2022. Fear and legitimacy in Sao Paulo, Brazil: police-citizen relations in a high violence, high fear context. Law & society review, 56 (1), 122–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H.G., 1973. Violence without moral restraint: reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of social issues, 29 (4), 25–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H.C., and Hamilton, V.L., 1989. Crimes of obedience: toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linden, A., 2015. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. The stata journal, 15 (2), 480–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, A., and Adams, J.L., 2011. Applying a propensity score-based weighting model to interrupted time series data: improving causal inference in programme evaluation. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 17 (6), 1231–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D.P., Kisbu-sakarya, Y., and Gottschall, A.C., 2013. Developments in mediation analysis. In: T. D. Little, ed. Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (Volume 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K., and Nix, J., 2022. Understanding the bounds of legitimacy: Weber’s facets of legitimacy and the police empowerment hypothesis. Justice quarterly, 39 (6), 1287–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk, C., and Pönitzsch, G., 2017. The role of affect in attitude formation toward new technologies: the case of stratospheric aerosol injection. Risk analysis, 37 (12), 2289–2304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, C., and Hodge, O., 2018. Empowering the police to fight terrorism in Israel. Criminology & criminal justice, 18 (5), 585–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midden, C.J.H., and Huijts, N.M.A., 2009. The role of trust in the affective evaluation of novel risks: the case of CO2 storage. Risk analysis, 29 (5), 743–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moule, R.K., et al., 2019. Assessing the direct and indirect effects of legitimacy on public empowerment of police: a study of public support for police militarization in America. Law & society review, 53 (1), 77–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muibu, D., and Olawole, I., 2022. Does representation matter: examining officer inclusion, citizen cooperation and police empowerment in a divided society. Conflict, security & development, 22 (2), 191–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nix, J., Ivanov, S., and Pickett, J.T., 2021. What does the public want police to do during pandemics? A national experiment. Criminology & public policy, 20 (3), 545–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pósch, K., et al., 2021. Truly free consent”? Clarifying the nature of police legitimacy using causal mediation analysis. Journal of experimental criminology, 17, 563–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryce, D.K., 2019. The relative effects of normative and instrumental models of policing on police empowerment: evidence from a sample of Sub-Saharan African immigrants. Criminal justice policy review, 30 (3), 428–450.
   Google Scholar
• Sakiyama, M., et al., 2017. Big hover or big brother? Public attitudes about drone usage in domestic policing activities. Security journal, 30 (4), 1027–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant, E., et al., 2022. Empowering the police during COVID-19: how do normative and instrumental factors impact public willingness to support expanded police powers? Criminology & criminal justice, doi:10.1177/17488958221094981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., et al., 2007. Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite, 49 (2), 459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., and Árvai, J., 2020. Risk perception: reflections on 40 years of research. Risk analysis, 40 (S1), 2191–2206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slovic, P., et al., 2002. Rational actors or rational fools: implications of the affect heuristic for behavioural economics. The journal of socio-economics, 31 (4), 329–342.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., and Peters, E., 2006. Risk perception and affect. Current directions in psychological science, 15 (6), 322–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., and Tyler, T.R., 2003. The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & society review, 37 (3), 513–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinkner, R., 2019. Clarifying the contours of the police legitimacy measurement debate: a response to Cao and Graham. Asian journal of criminology, 14, 309–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 1997. The psychology of legitimacy: a relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and social psychology review, 1 (4), 323–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 2006a. Why people obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 2006b. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual review of psychology, 57, 375–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilalta-Perdomo, C., Fondevila, G., and Dammert, L., 2023. Getting back to the state: policing the COVID-19 pandemic. Policing and society, 33 (6), 732–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesberg, J.A., and Bradford, B., 2019. Affect and trust as predictors of public support for armed police: evidence from London. Policing and society, 29 (9), 1058–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., Yang-Wallentin, F., and Bentler, P.M., 2012. ML versus MI for missing data with violation of distribution conditions. Sociological methods & research, 41 (4), 598–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar