‘Strands in a cable’: effective investigator decision-making using forensic identification evidence in volume crime investigations

References

• Aepli, P., Ribaux, O., and Summerfield, E., 2011. Decision making in policing. operations and management. Lausanne: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.M., et al., 2018. The unrealised promise of forensic science – an empirical study of its production and use. X, California: RAND Justice Institute and Environment Justice Policy, 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Artello, K., and Albanese, J.S., 2019. Investigative decision-making in public corruption cases: factors influencing case outcomes. Cogent social sciences, 7 (1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ask, K., and Alison, L., 2010. Investigators’ decision making. In: P. A. Granhag, ed. Forensic psychology in context: Nordic and international perspectives. Cullompton, UK: Willan, 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Baechler, S., et al., 2020. Breaking the barriers between intelligence, investigation and evaluation: a continuous approach to define the contribution and scope of forensic science. Forensic science international, 309, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, I., 2010. Circumstantial evidence in criminal cases. Bar news: The journal of the New South Wales Bar association, 42, 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, E.C., 2009. The interpretation and exploitation of information in criminal investigations. PhD thesis. University of Birmingham, 1-382.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, S., et al., 2016. To analyse a trace or not? evaluating the decision-making process in the criminal investigation. Forensic science international, 262, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, H.S., 2018. The decision process: police officers’ search for information in dispute encounters. Policing and society, An international journal of research and policy, 28 (1), 90–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, S., and Fiest, A., 2005. The use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: a review of the research literature. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Brandl, S.G., and Frank, J., 1994. The relationship between evidence, detective effort and the disposition of burglary and robbery investigations. American journal of police, 13, 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2022. Thematic analysis, a practical guide. London: SAGE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brookman, F., et al., 2022. Crafting credible homicide narratives: forensic technoscience in contemporary criminal investigations. Deviant behaviour, 43 (3), 340–366. doi:10.1080/01639625.2020.1837692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookman, F., and Innes, M., 2013. The problem of success: what is ‘good’ homicide investigation? Policing and society, 23 (3), 292–310. doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.771538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., et al., 2016. A step towards improving workflow practices for volume crime investigations: outcomes of a 90-day trial in South Australia. Police practice and research, 13, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., 2021. The effectiveness of forensic identification evidence in volume crime policing in Australia. PhD thesis. University of Tasmania, 1–441.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Ross, A., and Attewell, R.G., 2014. Benchmarking forensic performance in Australia – volume crime. Forensic science policy & management: An international journal, 5 (3–4), 91–98. doi:10.1080/19409044.2014.981347
   Google Scholar
• Bruenisholz, E., et al., 2019. Benchmarking forensic volume crime performance in Australian. Forensic science international: synergy, 1, 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.05.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrows, J., et al., 2005. Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. (Home Office Research Study 295), 1-176.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S.L., 2016. Forensic science identification evidence: tensions between law and science. The journal of philosophy, science & Law, 16, 1–35. doi:10.5840/jpsl20161622
   Google Scholar
• Corsianos, M., 2010. Discretion in detectives’ decision making and ‘high profile’ cases. Police practice and research, 4 (3), 301–314. doi:10.1080/1561426032000113893
   Google Scholar
• Crispino, F., 2008. Nature and place of crime scene management within forensic sciences. Science and justice, 48, 24–28. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, J., 1983. Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Washington : Police Executive Research Forum, U.S, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Fahsing, I.A., 2016. The making of an expert detective. thinking and deciding in criminal investigations. PhD thesis. University of Gothernburg, 1–119
   Google Scholar
• Fahsing, I., and Ask, K., 2015. The making of an expert detective: the role of experience in English and Norwegian police officers’ investigative decision-making. Psychology, crime and Law, 22, 203–223. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, J., and Rhodes, R.A.W. 2016. Can experience be evidence? In: Public policy and administration specialist group, panel 2: policy design and learning, PSA 66th annual international conference, March 2016 Birmingham, 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, R., and Plecas, D., 2016. Introduction to criminal investigation: processes, practices and thinking. New Westminster BC: Justice Institute of British Columbia. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/criminalinvestigation/.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, P.W., Chaiken, J.M., and Petersilia, J., 1977. The criminal investigation process: A summary report. Policing analysis, 3 (2), 187–217.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, W., 1995. Propensity evidence, similar facts and the high court. Queensland university of technology Law and justice journal, 11, 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Heit, E., 2000. Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 7 (4), 569–592. doi:10.3758/BF03212996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2007. Scientific work improvement model – summative report. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, M., et al., 2020. The impact of evidence type on police investigators’ perceptions of suspect culpability and evidence reliability. Zeitschrift für psychologie, 228 (3), 188–198. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julian, R., Howes, L., and White, R., 2022. Critical forensic studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., 2023. Towards gender equality reform in police organisations: the utility of a social justice approach. Police practice and research, 24, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty, S., Julian, R., and Hayes, R., 2015. The impact of forensic evidence on criminal justice: evidence from case processing studies. In: K.J. Strom, and M. J. Hickman, eds. Forensic science and the administration of justice: critical issues and directions. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, C., 2012. Legal storytelling in pre-trial investigations: arguing for a wider perspective on forensic evidence. New genetics and society, 31 (3), 299–309. doi:10.1080/14636778.2012.687084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, A., Edgar, T., and Maguire, C.N., 2014. A model for managing crime scene examiners. Forensic science policy and management: An international journal, 5 (3–4), 76–90. doi:10.1080/19409044.2014.978416
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, A., Fraser, J., and Williams, R., 2012. Crime scene examiners and volume crime investigations: an empirical study of perception and practice. Forensic science policy & management: An international journal, 3, 53–61. doi:10.1080/19409044.2012.728680
   Google Scholar
• Maegherman, E., et al., 2020. Test of the analysis of competing hypotheses in legal decision-making. Applied cognitive psychology, 35, 62–70. doi:10.1002/acp.3738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R.M., 2017. Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part I: A conceptual model. Science and justice, 57 (6), 455–459. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2017.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moston, S., and Engelberg, T., 2011. The effects of evidence on the outcome of interviews with criminal suspects. Police practice and research, 12 (6), 518–526. doi:10.1080/15614263.2011.563963
   Google Scholar
• Prenzler, T., 2020. Remarks by the guest editor. Police, practice and research, 21 (5), 439–441. doi:10.1080/15614263.2020.1809826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux, O., Roux, C., and Crispino, F., 2016. Expressing the value of forensic science in policing. Australian journal of forensic sciences, 49 (5), 489–501. doi:10.1080/00450618.2016.1229816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, J., et al., 2008. The DNA field experiment: cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of DNA in the investigation of high-volume crimes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S., 2002. The metamorphoses of reasonable doubt: how changes in the burden of proof have weakened the presumption of innocence. Notre dame Law school review, 1165, 1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., and Flanagan, C., 2000. The effective detective: identifying the skills of an effective SIO. London: Home Office Policing and Reducing Crime Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, L., Cushway, D., and White, S., 2003. Forensic science targeting volume crime recidivists. Forensic bulletin, 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, S., and Bowling, B., 2006. Art, craft and science of detective work. The police journal, 79, 323–329. doi:10.1350/pojo.2006.79.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Walter, M., 2013. Social research methods: an Australian perspective. Hobart: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westera, N.J., et al., 2013. Defining the “effective detective”. Nathan: ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security (Briefing paper).
   Google Scholar
• Wullenweber, S., and Giles, S., 2021. The effectiveness of forensic evidence in the investigation of volume crime scenes. Science and justice, 61 (5), 542–554. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2021.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar