The Influence of Network Structural Properties on Information Dissemination Power in Microblogging Systems

REFERENCES

• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455. doi: 10.2307/2667105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, M. K., Galletta, D. F., & Carley, K. M. (2003). Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science, 49, 21–38. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.1.21.12756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Hamelin, J. I., Dall’Asta, L., Barrat, A., & Vespignani, A. (2008). K-core decomposition of Internet graphs: Hierarchies, self-similarity and measurement biases. Networks and Hegerogeneous Media, 3, 371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM international Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 65–74). Nw York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1935845
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web ( pp. 519–528). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2187836.2187907
   Google Scholar
• Bampo, M., Ewing, M. T., Mather, D. R., Stewart, D., & Wallace, M. (2011). The effects of the social structure of digital networks on viral marketing performance. Information Systems Research, 19, 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (1995). Centrality and AIDS. Connections, 18, 112–114.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braha, D., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2004). Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks. Journal of Information Technology, 19, 244–253. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 36, 441–470. doi: 10.2307/256588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. P. ( 2010). Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In 4th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (Vol. 14, p. 8). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/download/1538/1826
   Google Scholar
• Cha, M., Mislove, A., & Gummadi, K. P. (2009). A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the Flickr social network. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World Wide Web ( pp. 721–730). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1526709.1526806
   Google Scholar
• Che, L. M., Wei, Y. G., Sun, B., Qiu, Q., & Zhan, N. X. (2010). Micro-blog social network analysis: “Digu” network as an example. In 2010 2nd International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce ( pp. 1–3). New York, NY: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IEEC.2010.5533197
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Liu, P., Wang, X., & Gu, Y. ( 2012). Follow whom? Chinese users have different choice. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.0167. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0167
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., Erez, K., ben-Avraham, D., & Havlin, S. (2000). Resilience of the Internet to Random Breakdowns. Physical Review Letters, 85, 4626–4628. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, R. (2007). Robust methods in regression analysis—Theory and application. Munich, Germany: GRIN Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis. Vancouver, Canada: Empirical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (1982). Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social Networks, 3, 273–285. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(82)90003-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Q., Abel, F., Houben, G.-J., & Yu, Y. ( 2012). A comparative study of users’ microblogging behavior on Sina Weibo and Twitter. In User modeling, adaptation, and personalization (pp. 88–101). New York, NY: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_8
   Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37, 1717–1731. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148–170. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177705148
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California Riverside. Retrieved from http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/˜hanneman/nettext/C10_Centrality.html
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, L., Chung, K. S. K., & Murshed, S. T. H. ( 2007). Exploring temporal communication through social networks. In Proceedings of the 11th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 19–30). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1776994.1777001
   Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis ( pp. 56–65). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1348549.1348556
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Y. G., Hwangbo, H., Yi, J. S., Rau, P. L. P., Fang, X., & Ling, C. (2010). The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 1100–1121. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2010.516727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web ( pp. 591–600). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1772690.1772751
   Google Scholar
• Latora, V., & Marchiori, M. (2007). A measure of centrality based on network efficiency. New Journal of Physics, 9, 188. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman, K., & Jones, L. ( 2006). Social browsing on Flickr. Paper presented at the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, CO, March, 2007. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0612047
   Google Scholar
• Lewiński, M., & Mohammed, D. (2012). Deliberate design or unintended consequences: The argumentative uses of Facebook during the Arab Spring. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(1), Article 11.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Alderson, D., Doyle, J. C., & Willinger, W. (2005). Towards a theory of scale-free graphs: def, properties, and implications. Internet Mathematics, 2, 431–523. doi: 10.1080/15427951.2005.10129111
   Google Scholar
• Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K. P., Druschel, P., & Bhattacharjee, B. (2007). Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet Measurement ( pp. 29–42). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1298306.1298311
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27, 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, J. ( 2012). China’s Sina Weibo passes 400m users, acknowledges pressure from rival Tencent’s WeChat. The Next Web. Retrieved from http://thenextweb.com/asia/2012/11/16/sina-books-152-million-in-q3-revenue-as-it-faces-tough-competition-from-tencents-wechat/
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, C., Köbler, F., Goswami, S., & Krcmar, H. (2013). Tweeting to feel connected: A model for social connectedness in online social networks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 670–687. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2013.768137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2011). Influence and passivity in social media. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World Wide Web ( pp. 113–114). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1963192.1963250
   Google Scholar
• Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31, 581–603. doi: 10.1007/BF02289527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22, 109–127. doi: 10.1177/0038038588022001007
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. B. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5, 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimbel, A. (1953). Structural parameters of communication networks. bulletetin of Mathematical Biology, 15, 501–507.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. (2012). A tale of two microblogs in China. Media, Culture & Society, 34, 773–783. doi: 10.1177/0163443712448951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, B., & Ng, V. T. (2012). Identifying influential users by their postings in social networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Modeling Social Media ( pp. 1–8). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2310057.2310059
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A. G., Gonzalez, V., Binder, J., & Nevarez, G. (2011). Social mediating technologies: Social affordances and functionalities. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27, 1037–1065. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2011.555318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitter. ( 2012, March 21). Twitter turn six [Weblog post]. Retrieved from http://blog.twitter.com/2012/03/twitter-turns-six.html
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, J., Lim, E.-P., Jiang, J., & He, Q. (2010). TwitterRank: Finding topic-sensitive influential Twitterers. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining ( pp. 261–270). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1718487.1718520
   Google Scholar
• Wu, F., Huberman, B. A., Adamic, L. A., & Tyler, J. R. (2004). Information flow in social groups. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 337, 327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, S., & Almaas, E. (2005). Peeling the yeast protein network. Proteomics, 5, 444–449. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200400962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Wu, J., & Xu, K. (2010). Weak ties: Subtle role of information diffusion in online social networks. Physical Review E, 82, 016105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.016105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar