Study of User Search Activities With Two Discovery Tools at an Academic Library

REFERENCES

• Agosti, M., Crivellari, F., & Di Nunzio, G. M. (2011). Web log analysis: a review of a decade of studies about information acquisition, inspection and interpretation of user interaction. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 24, 663–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asunka, S., Chae, H. S., Hughes, B., & Natriello, G. ( 2009). Understanding academic information seeking habits through analysis of web server log files: The case of the Teachers College Library website. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35, 33–45. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913330800195X
   Google Scholar
• Becher, M., & Schmidt, K. (2011). Taking discovery systems for a test drive. Journal of Web Librarianship, 5, 199–219.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, N. J., Kelly, D., Kim, G., Kim, J.-Y., Lee, H.-J., Muresan, G., … Cool, C. (2003). Query length in interactive information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval—SIGIR ’03 ( pp. 205–212). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS–A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland ( Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, S., & Mellinger, M. (2011). The Impact of Serial Solutions’ SummonTM on Information Literacy Instruction: Librarian Perceptions. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 16(4), 159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Comeaux, D. J. (2012). Usability testing of a web-scale discovery system at an academic library. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19, 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J., & Roth, P. (2012). Incorporating Millennium Catalog Records into Serials Solutions’ Summon. Technical Services Quarterly, 29(3), 193–199.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, W., & Coysh, S. J. (2011). Usability testing of VuFind at an academic library. Library Hi Tech, 29, 301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmanuel, J. (2011). Usability of the VuFind next generation online catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 30, 44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, J. C., Mandernach, M., Nelson, C. S., Paulo, J. R., & Saunders, G. (2012). Usability test results for discovery tool in an academic library. Information Technology and Libraries, 31, 83–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawley, N., & Krysak, N. (2012). Information Literacy Opportunities within the Discovery Tool Environment. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2–4), 207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J., & Sheridan, L. (2011). Web scale discovery: the user experience. New Library World, 112, 236–247.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock-Beaulieu, M. (1990). Evaluating the impact of an online library catalogue on subject searching behavior at the catalogue and at the shelves. Journal of Documentation, 46(3), 18–338.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M. A., & Yang, S. Q. (2012). “Discovering” what’s changed: A revist of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30, 253–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. J. (2006). Search log analysis: What it is, what’s been done, how to do it. Library Information Science Research, 28, 407–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Cunningham, S. J., McNab, R., & Boddie, S. (2000). A transaction log analysis of a digital library. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3, 152–169.
   Google Scholar
• Kortum, P. T., & Bangor, A. (2013). Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurth, M. (1993). The limits and limitations of transaction log analysis. Library Hi Tech, 11, 98–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lown, C. (2008). A transaction log analysis of NCSU’s faceted navigation OPAC. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lown, C., Sierra, T., & Boyer, J. ( 2012). How users search the library from a single search box. College & Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2012/01/09/crl-321.abstract
   Google Scholar
• Majors, R. (2012). Comparative user experiences of next-generation catalogue interfaces. Library Trends, 61, 186–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, X., & Hemminger, B. M. (2010). Beyond text querying and ranking lists: How people are searching through faceted catalogs in two library environments. In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting ( Vol. 47), October 22–27, 2010, Pittsburg, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, X., & Hemminger, B. M. (2011). Effectiveness of real-time query expansion in a library catalog. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pennell, B., & Sexton, J. ( 2010). Implementing a real-time suggestion service in a library discovery layer. Code4Lib Journal. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3022
   Google Scholar
• Sheble, L., & Wildemuth, B. (2009). Transaction logs. In B. Wildemuth ( Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science ( pp. 166–177). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, M. B. J., & Saracevic, T. (2001). Searching the web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 226–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsett-Scott, B., & Reese, P. E. (2012). Academic libraries and discovery tools: A survey of the literature. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19, 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Villén-Rueda, L., Senso, J. A., & de Moya-Anegón, F. ( 2007). The Use of OPAC in a large academic library: A transactional log analysis study of subject searching. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33, 327–337. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133307000377
   Google Scholar
• Vu, K.-P. L., Hanley, G. L., Strybel, T. Z., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Metacognitive processes in human-computer interaction: self-assessments of knowledge as predictors of computer expertise. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 12, 43–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. H. (2013). E-books in academic libraries: Challenges for discovery and access. Serials Review, 39, 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. W., & Marchionini, G. (2007). Examining the effectiveness of real-time query expansion. Information Processing & Management, 43, 685–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. C., & Foster, A. K. (2011). Promise fulfilled? An EBSCO discovery service usability study. Journal of Web Librarianship, 5, 179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Wynar, B. S., & Taylor, A. G. (1992). Introduction to cataloging and classification. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, S.-T., & Liu, Y. (2011). Integrated faceted browser and direct search to enhance information retrieval in text-based digital libraries. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27, 364–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. (2013). User-centered evaluation of a discovery layer system with Google Scholar. In A. Marcus ( Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability. Web, mobile, and product design ( Vol. 8015, pp. 313–322). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar