Augmented Presentations: Supporting the Communication in Presentations by Means of Augmented Reality

REFERENCES

• Aedo, I., Yu, S., Díaz, P., Acuña, P., & Onorati, T. (2012). Personalized alert notifications and evacuation routes in indoor environments. Sensors, 12, 7804–7827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Public speaking and audience responses: Some techniques for inviting applause. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage ( Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis (pp. 370–412). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 355–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., & Derose, T. D. (1993). Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The see-through interface. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, D. W., LaBella, V. P., Clingan, T., Ding, Z., Stewart, G., & Thibado, P. M. (2002). Enhancing the student–instructor interaction frequency. The Physics Teacher, 40, 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., & Anisetti, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51, 341–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (1993). Booing: The anatomy of a disaffiliate response. American Sociological Review, 58, 110–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M. (2003). Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 298–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. R.,Waitz, I., Brodeur, D. R., Soderholm, D. H., & Nasr, R. (2002). Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class. Paper presented at the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C., Wieferich, J., Ritter, F., Rieder, C., & Peitgen, H.-O. (2010). Illustrative visualization of 3D planning models for augmented reality in liver surgery, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 5, 133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. The American Journal of Sociology, 92, 110–157.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes ( Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, N., & McFarlane, A. (2005). Conferences as learning communities: Some early lessons in using “back-channel” technologies at an academic conference—Distributed intelligence or divided attention. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, H.-K., Lim, S., Youn, J., & Lee, J. (2014). An augmented reality-based authoring tool for E-learning applications. Multimedia Tools & Applications, 68, 225–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. S., & Sun, Y. (2013). Spatial augmented reality on person: Exploring the most personal medium. Virtual Augmented and Mixed Reality, Designing and Developing Augmented and Virtual Environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8021, 169–174
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Tonkin, E., & Shabajee, P. (2005). Using networked technologies to support conferences. In EUNIS 2005 Conference Proceedings, (CDROM). University of Bath, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R., & Bricker, P. (1967). Effects of transmission delay and access delay on the efficiency of verbal communication. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 286–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, S., Silverman, J., & Draper, J. (1998). Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. Oxford, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press
   Google Scholar
• Lamata, P., Ali, W., Cano, A., Cornella, J., Declerck, J., Elle, O. J., … Gómez, E. J. (2010). Augmented reality for minimally invasive surgery: Overview and some recent advances. Augmented Reality, 73–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, J., Fenq, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2010). Research methods in human–computer interaction. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Litchfield, A., Raban, R., Dyson, L. E., Leigh, E., & Tyler, J. (2009). Using students’ devices and a no-to-low cost online tool to support interactive experiential mLearning. Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologie (ICALT) 2009, 674–678.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. G., Ashar, B. H., & Getz, K. J. (2003). Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 23, 109–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulloni, A., Seichter, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2011). Handheld augmented reality indoor navigation with activity-based instructions. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services - MobileHCI ’11, 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, D. P., & Proctor, J. (2008). Getting W. I. L. D in the classroom. Proceedings of 3rd Practice Based and Practitioner Research Conference, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Oviatt, S., & Cohen, P. (1991). Discourse structure and performance efficiency in interactive and non-interactive speech modalities. Computer Speech and Language, 5, 297–326.
   Google Scholar
• Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology, British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 544–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendle-Short, J. (2006). The academic presentation: Situated talk in action (Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Vol. 3). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1, 145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. C. (1979). Assertion. In P. Cole ( Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9 (pp. 315–332). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4, 119–140.
   Google Scholar
• Zarraonandia, T., Aedo, I., Díaz, P., & Montero, A. (2013). An augmented lecture feedback system to support learner and teacher communication. Journal of British Educational Technology, 44, 616–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar