Scenario-Based Observation Approach for Eliciting User Requirements for Haptic User Interfaces

REFERENCES

• Acuna, S. T., Castro, J. W., & Juristo, N. (2012). A HCI technique for improving requirements elicitation. Information and Software Technology, 54, 1357–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, G. J., & Rogich, M. B. (2001). An empirical investigation of user requirements elicitation: Comparing the effectiveness of prompting techniques. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 223–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario based design. Interacting with Computers, 13, 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1992). Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10, 181–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Reimann, R., & Cronin, D. (2007). About Face 3.0: The essentials of interaction design. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11, 229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dennerlein, J., & Yang, M. (2001). Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: Performance and musculoskeletal loading issues. Human Factors, 43, 278–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieste, O., Juristo, N., & Shull, F. (2008). Understanding the customer: What do we know about requirements elicitation? IEEE Software, 25(2), 11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanger, S. M., Frankel, L. A., & Hazen, N. (2012). Peer exclusion in preschool children’s play: Naturalistic observations in a playground setting. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58, 224–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer, C. (2011). New challenges for product design: The product of design. Design Management Review, 22(4), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: principles in practice. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, B., & Huber, M. (2011). Design and evaluation of haptic effects for use in a computer desktop for the physically disabled. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10, 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G. Q. (2002). Web-based support for collaborative product design review. Computers in Industry, 48, 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. N., Smith-Jackson, T. L., & Nam, C. S. (2013). Elicitation of haptic user interface needs of people with low vision. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 29, 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleef, E., Trijp, H. C. M., & Luning, P. (2005). Consumer research in the early stage of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuber, R., Yu, W., & McAllister, G. (2007). Towards developing assistive haptic feedback for visually impaired internet users. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1525–1534.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Suh, Y., Kim, I. K., Park, J. H., & Yun, M. H. (2010). A systematic framework for evaluating design concepts of a new product. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 20, 424–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. L., Murphy, E., Crowe, J. A., & Norris, B. J. (2006). Capturing user requirements in medical device development: The role of ergonomics. Physiological Measurement, 27(8), 49–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., & Zelesnik, R. (1998). An insidious haptic invasion: Adding force feedback to the X Desktop. Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mynatt, E., & Weber, G. (1994). Nonvisual presentation of graphical user interfaces: Contrasting two approaches. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 166–172.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C. S., Bahn, S., & Lee, R. (2013). Acceptance of assistive technology by special education teachers: A structural equation model approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 365–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C. S., Li, Y., Yamaguchi, T., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2012). Haptic user interfaces for the visually impaired: Implications for haptically enhanced science learning systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28, 784–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Modhrain, M. S., & Gillespie, B. (1997). The Moose: A haptic user interface for blind persons. Proceedings of the Third WWW6 Conference. Available at: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/STANM/stanms/stanm95/stanm95.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ramstain, C., Martial, O., Dufresne, A., Carignan, M., Chasse, P., & Mabilleau, P. (1996). Touching and hearing GUI’s: Design issues for the PC-access system. Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. J. (2010). Naturalistic observation. Encyclopedia of Research Design, pp. 886–891.
   Google Scholar
• Sandhu, J. (1993). Design for the elderly: User-based evaluation studies involving elderly users with special needs. Applied Ergonomics, 24, 30–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2005). Product design and development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., & Pardasani, A. (2002). Collaborative conceptual design—State of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design, 34, 981–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W., Kuber, R., Murphy, E., Strain, P., & McAllister, G. (2006). A novel multimodal interface for improving visually impaired people’s web accessibility. Virtual Reality, 9, 133–148.
   Google Scholar