Testing Aesthetic and Function Design Preference for Touch Screen and Non–Touch Screen Mobile Phones Using Interactive Genetic Algorithms

REFERENCES

• Balakrishnan, V., & Yeow, P. H. (2008). Hand anthropometry and SMS satisfaction. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 816–822. doi:10.3923/jas.2008.816.822
   Google Scholar
• Bauerly, M. (2007). Mathematical modeling and experimental study of interface aesthetics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. ( AAT 3276095)
   Google Scholar
• Bauerly, M., & Liu, Y. (2008). Effects of symmetry and grouping on interface and design aesthetics. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24, 275–287. doi:10.1080/10447310801920508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauerly, M., & Liu, Y. (2009). Evaluation and improvement of interface aesthetics with an Interactive Genetic Algorithm (IGA). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25, 155–166. doi:10.1080/10447310802629801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvelin, C., Sagi, T., Coni, P., André, J., Jauze, C., & Lespinet-Najib, V. (2014). Haptics on a touch screen: characteristics of perceptual thresholds. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 3, 872–881. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.941273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S. B. (2002). Towards creative evolutionary systems with interactive genetic algorithm. Applied Intelligence, 16, 129–138. doi:10.1023/A:1013614519179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, M. C., Chang, C. C., & Hsu, S. H. (2001). Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 247–258. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00054-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• comScore, Inc. (2009, November 3). Touchscreen mobile phone adoption grows at blistering pace in U.S. during past year [Press release]. Reston, VA. Available from http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2009/11/Touchscreen-Mobile-Phone-Adoption-Grows-at-Blistering-Pace-in-U.S.-During-Past-Year
   Google Scholar
• comScore, Inc. (2010, February 8). comScore reports December 2009 U.S. mobile subscriber market share [Press release]. Reston, VA. Available from http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2010/2/comScore-Reports-December-2009-U.S.-Mobile-Subscriber-Market-Share
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1996). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, W., & Ding, M. (2009, December). A Kansei-based method of product form design and its application in mobile phone. Paper presented at the Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, Wuhan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, E. A., Wakefield, G. H., Van Tasell, D. J., & Rickert, M. E. (2004). Efficient perceptual tuning of hearing aids with genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 12, 144–155. doi:10.1109/TSA.2003.822640
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & Jun, H. J. (1995). Visual semantics emergence to support creative designing: a computational view. In J. S. Gero, M. L. Maher & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Preprints Computational Models of Creative Design, University of Sydney, pp. 87–117.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. H., Kim, K. J., Yun, M. H., Hong, S. W., & Kim, J. (2004). Identifying mobile phone design features critical to user satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 14, 15–29. doi:10.1002/hfm.10051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, S. J., Naveda, J. F., Jones, R. P., Roetling, P., & Thakkar, N. (2004, October). Aesthetic measures for automated document layout. Paper presented at ACM Symposium on Document Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• ITU. (2013, October). Measuring the information society. Paper presented at the International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, P., Johnson, P. W., & Hagberg, M. (2007). Accuracy and feasibility of using an electrogoniometer for measuring simple thumb movements. Ergonomics, 50, 647–659. doi:10.1080/00140130601164490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. C. (2008). Interactive Genetic Algorithms for shape preference assessment in engineering design (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. C., Papalambros, P., & Wakefield, G. H. (2006, December). The development of a tool for the preference assessment of the visual aesthetics of an object using Interactive Genetic Algorithms. Paper presented at the 9th Generative Art Conference, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2003). Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology. Ergonomics, 46, 1273–1292. doi:10.1080/00140130310001610829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, A. (1992). Graphic design for electronic documents and user interfaces. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• McMullan, J., & Richardson, I. (2006, December). The mobile phone: A hybrid multi-platform medium. Paper presented at the 3rd Australasian conference on Interactive Entertainment, Murdoch University, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan-Roberts, D., Beeker, A., & Liu, Y. (2009, November). Modeling two key physical ergonomic problems with mobile phones. Paper presented at the University of Michigan Engineering Graduate Symposium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan-Roberts, D., Kelly, J. C., & Liu, Y. (2011, September). Determining the effect of users’ mobile phone on design preference via Interactive Genetic Algorithms. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Las Vegas, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan-Roberts, D., & Liu, Y. (2010, September). Investigation of relative mobile phone size preference using Interactive Genetic Algorithms. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan-Roberts, D., Liu, Y., Young, M., Hays, J. D., An So, C., Little, C., & Zhao, L. H. (2009, August). Content analysis of literature on mobile phone design features. Paper presented at the 17th World Congress on Ergonomics, Beijing China.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo, D. C., & Byrne, J. G. (2001). Another look at a model for evaluating interface aesthetics. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 11, 515–535.
   Google Scholar
• Noblet, J. (1993). Industrial design: Reflections of a century. Paris, France: Abbeville.
   Google Scholar
• Obrador, P. (2007, January). Content selection based on Compositional Image Quality. Paper presented at the IS&T/SPIE 19th Annual Symposium on Electronic Imaging, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, K. N., & Wood, K. L. (2001). Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Plos, O., & Buisine, S. (2006, April). Universal design for mobile phones: A case study. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K., Sangwon L., Chung, B. D., & Park, C. (2015). Users’ emotional valance, arousal, and engagement based on perceived usability and aesthetics for web sites. International Journal of Computer–Human Interaction, 31, 72–87. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.959103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seva, R. R., Duh, H., & Helander, M. G. (2006, October). Factors affecting emotional responses in mobile phone design evaluation. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar