Concept Mapping Usability Evaluation: An Exploratory Study of a New Usability Inspection Method

REFERENCES

• Ackerman, F., & Eden, C. (2001). Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bias, R. G., Lewis, C., & Gillan, D. J. (2014.) The tortoise and the (soft)ware: Moore’s Law, Amdahl’s Law, and performance trends for human-machine systems. Journal of Usability Studies, 9, 129–151.
   Google Scholar
• Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997). Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies in work teams series, 4, (pp. 249–279). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., Newswander, C. B., & McNair, L. D. (2009). Using concept maps to assess interdisciplinary integration of green engineering knowledge. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(3), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The Mind Map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. New York: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Cañas, A. J., Coffey, J. W., Carnot, M. J., Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R., Feltovich, J., & Novak, J. D. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques for education and performance support (Report). Pensacola, FL: The Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, G. L., & Olson, J. C. (2002). Mapping consumers’ mental models with ZMET. Psychology & Marketing, 29, 477–501.
   Google Scholar
• Coller, B. D., & Scott, M. J. (2009). Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering. Computers & Education, 53, 900–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, B., Klein, G. & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Working minds: A practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, B. J., Lovell, M. R., Perez, R. A., & Stern, N. E. (2011). Using concept maps within the product design process in engineering: A case study. In B. M. Moon, R. R. Hoffman, J. D. Novak, & A. J. Cañas (Eds.), Applied concept mapping: Capturing, analyzing, and organizing knowledge (pp. 317–326). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desnoyers, C. A. (2011) Vying for the use of CmapTools in corporate training. In B. M. Moon, R. R. Hoffman, J. D. Novak, & A. J. Cañas (Eds.), Applied concept mapping: Capturing, analyzing, and organizing knowledge (pp. 317–326). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubash, M. (2005). Moore’s Law is dead, says Gordon Moore. Techworld. Retrieved from http://news.techworld.com/operating-systems/3477/moores-law-is-dead-says-gordon-moore
   Google Scholar
• Dubberly, H. (2011). Using concept maps in product development: Preparing to redesign java.sun.com. In J. Kolko (Ed.), Exposing the magic of design: A practitioner’s guide to the methods and theory of synthesis (pp. 109–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, T. C., & Hoffman, R. (2012). Ontology creation as a sensemaking activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 12, 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Faily, S., Lyle, J., Paul, A., Atzeni, A., Blomme, D., Desruelle, H., & Bangalore, K. (2012). Requirements sensemaking using concept maps. In Human-centered software engineering (pp. 217–232). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. N., Saletti, J., Patterson, H., Thornton, R., Lipson, J., & Spring, C. (1990). Computer-based concept mapping. Journal of College Science Teaching, 19, 347–352.
   Google Scholar
• Gerken, J., Jetter, H.-C., Zöllner, M. I., Mader, M., & Reiterer, H. (2011). The concept maps method as a tool to evaluate the usability of APIs. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI (pp. 3373–3382). ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R., Novak, J., & Wandersee, J. (Eds.). (1990). Perspectives on concept mapping [Special issue]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. (2012). The UX book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminal (VDT’s)–Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO 9241-11(E)). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak, J. (2000). Assessing science understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, B., Hoffman. R. R., Cañas, A. J., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.). (2011). Applied concept mapping: Capturing, analyzing and organizing knowledge. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 25–64). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1995). Characteristics of usability problems found by heuristic evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-problems-found-by-heuristic-evaluation/
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2014). The design of everyday things (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58(7), 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept Maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept Maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1931 –1958). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, Vols. 1–6; A. Burks, Vols. 7–8, Eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. F., Foo, N., & Rao, A. (Eds.) (1988). Conceptual graphs for knowledge systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zele, E., Lenaerts, J., & Wieme, W. (2004). Improving the usefulness of concept maps as a research tool for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1043–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S., & Righi, C. (Eds.). (2002). User-centered design: An integrated approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. (2008). Glut: Mastering information through the ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G. (1997). Rethinking market research: Putting people back in. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 424–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar