Can Autonomous Vehicles Be Safe and Trustworthy? Effects of Appearance and Autonomy of Unmanned Driving Systems

REFERENCES

• Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O., & Mahmud, Al A. (2009). Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benenson, R., Fraichard, T., & Parent, M. (2008). Achievable safety of driverless ground vehicles. Proceedings of Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision ’08, 515–521.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. Zanna, J. Olson, & C Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 143–177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61, 1476–1486.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., & Kiesler, S. (2002). All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems ’02, 321–326
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, T., Gallup, J. G. G., & Povinelli, D. (1993). Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, M., Swann, W., & Silvera, D. (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1101–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human–robot cooperation. Proceedings of the Robot and Human Interactive Communication ’03, 55–60
   Google Scholar
• Gong, L. (2008). How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1494–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guizzo, E. (2011). How Google’s self-driving car works. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/how-google-self-driving-car-works
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. E., Perander, J., Smecko, T., & Trask, J. (1998). Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: Development and validation of the work safety scale. Journal of Safety Research, 29, 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 262–271.
   Google Scholar
• Itoh, M., & Inagaki, T. (2004). A microworld approach to identifying issues of human-automation systems design for supporting operator’s situation awareness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., & Grayson, K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58, 500–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, R. F., & Sutcliffe, A. (2013). Attractive agents are more persuasive. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30, 142–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J. (2014). Can smartphones be specialists? Effects of specialization in mobile advertising. Telematics and Informatics, 31, 640–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., Park, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1799–1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., & Sundar, S. S. (in press). Mobile persuasion: Can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust? Human Communication Research. doi:10.1111/hcre.12064.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2003). Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction. Proceedings of CHI’03, 289–296.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2004). The multiple source effect and synthesized speech: Doubly disembodied language as a conceptual framework. Human Communication Research, 30, 182–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 754–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., How, J., Teller, S., Berger, M., Campbell, S., Fiore, G., … Williams, J. (2008). A perception-driven autonomous urban vehicle. Journal of Field Robotics, 25, 727–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Zheng, N., & Cheng, H. (2004). Springrobot: A prototype autonomous vehicle and its algorithms for lane detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 5, 300–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 45, 669–678.
   Google Scholar
• Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaguna, E. (2014). Ford teams with Stanford, MIT to research automated driving. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/22/us-usa-ford-autonomous-driving-idUSBREA0L1BX20140122
   Google Scholar
• Ozguner, U., Stiller, C., & Redmill, K. (2007). Systems for safety and autonomous behavior in cars: The DARPA Grand Challenge experience. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95, 397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse and abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., & Wickens, C. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-30, 286–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A Social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 145–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., & Johnson, F. (2013). Understanding trust formation in digital information sources: The case of Wikipedia. Journal of Information Science, 39, 494–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B., & Parasuraman, R. (2005). Human-automation interaction. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1, 89–129.
   Google Scholar
• Soh, H., Reid, L. N., & King, K. W. (2009). Measuring trust in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38, 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. (2015). Vehicle registration statistics. Retrieved from http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1257
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, C., Hebert, M., Kanade, T. & Shafer, S. (1988). Vision and navigation for the Carnegie- Mellon Navlab. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis, 10, 362–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (2001). Where is computing driving cars? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 13, 203–229
   Google Scholar
• Watt, S. (1995). A brief naive psychology manifesto. Informatica, 19, 495–500.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim, Y. U., & Oh, S. (2003). Three-feature based automatic lane detection algorithm (TFALDA) for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 4, 219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar